Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-29-2009, 12:39 PM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by cnavarro
It was likely an example of an engine where the updated rear main seal wouldn't have fixed the problem of a drooping crankshaft carrier. The factory go/no go gauge for seal replacement versus engine replacement would have been used to determine that the engine was not repairable. The replacement engine likely is the latest generation, with the larger IMS bearing. I wouldn't have any concern about buying this car from what you have posted.
Charles,

When did Porsche start using a larger IMS bearing? I ask because my car had it's engine replaced in May of 2005 and I'm hoping it has the updated bearing.
__________________
-- John
'00 Boxster S
'86 911 Carrera Coupe (Sold)
Lucky is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page