View Single Post
Old 09-29-2009, 12:39 PM   #9
Lucky
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by cnavarro
It was likely an example of an engine where the updated rear main seal wouldn't have fixed the problem of a drooping crankshaft carrier. The factory go/no go gauge for seal replacement versus engine replacement would have been used to determine that the engine was not repairable. The replacement engine likely is the latest generation, with the larger IMS bearing. I wouldn't have any concern about buying this car from what you have posted.
Charles,

When did Porsche start using a larger IMS bearing? I ask because my car had it's engine replaced in May of 2005 and I'm hoping it has the updated bearing.
__________________
-- John
'00 Boxster S
'86 911 Carrera Coupe (Sold)
Lucky is offline   Reply With Quote