Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-04-2008, 04:43 PM   #1
Porsche "Purist"
 
Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,123
Garage
I think the lost of a wing full of fuel would have caused a fire.

If that happened while I was flying, it would be a BOKMAGB.
__________________
1998 Boxster with 7.8 DME, 2005 3.6 liter/325 hp, Variocam Plus, 996 Instrument panel
2001 Boxster original owner. I installed used motor at 89k.
1987 924S. 2002 996TT. PST-2
Owned and repaired Porsches since 1974. Porsche: It's not driving, it's therapy.
Paul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2008, 04:55 PM   #2
Registered User
 
Lil bastard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Du Monde
Posts: 2,199
Not bad... but NOT real.
__________________
1990 Porsche 964 Carrera 4 Cabriolet
1976 BMW 2002
1990 BMW 325is
1999 Porsche Boxster
(gone, but not forgotten)
http://i933.photobucket.com/albums/a...smiley-003.gif

Never drive faster than your Guardian Angel can fly!
Lil bastard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2008, 05:29 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: mandeville, la
Posts: 474
I saw this yesterday for the first time. Great video, but it was pointed out to me that at :55 seconds, the rear wheel disappears and then quickly reappears.
nola911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2008, 05:48 PM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,029
Quote:

"I think the lost of a wing full of fuel would have caused a fire.

If that happened while I was flying, it would be a BOKMAGB."

Posted by Paul.

I don't know much about stunt planes...would they (and this model in particular) have fuel storage in the wings??

Also---I figured out the KMAGB part, but what is the BO prefix part?

Re-watching the vid, I've decided that right when the craft goes from largely vertical to (seemingly magically) onto its landing gear, it looks a bit contrived. The bounce looks phony to me, and it's also when the focus too-conveniently gets a bit blurred, if only briefly. Could this be footage of a model (radio-controlled) aircraft?

My father-in-law also sent a link with some amazing radio-controlled flight. Check out:

www.video.shutupandfly.com/3DPracticeDan04.WMV

...especially the vertical, zero velocity hovering by these, fixed-wing aircraft.
Frodo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2008, 07:59 PM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: south San Jose, CA
Posts: 139
Impressive at first, but clearly fake
bigb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2008, 09:10 PM   #6
Track rat
 
Topless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern ID
Posts: 3,701
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frodo
Quote:

"I think the lost of a wing full of fuel would have caused a fire.

If that happened while I was flying, it would be a BOKMAGB."

Posted by Paul.

I don't know much about stunt planes...would they (and this model in particular) have fuel storage in the wings??

Also---I figured out the KMAGB part, but what is the BO prefix part?
Translation: Bend over and kiss my arse goodby.
Yep. Most have wet wings in addition to a fuselage fuel tank. Here is the Kirby Chambliss Edge540. Amazing pilot and complete loon.
http://www.air-races.com/aircraft/Edge%20540.htm
__________________
2009 Cayman 2.9L PDK (with a few tweaks)
PCA-GPX Chief Driving Instructor-Ret.
Topless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2008, 10:14 PM   #7
There Is No Substitute.
 
rick3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West Coast
Posts: 3,253
Garage
I am not so sure this is fake. My dad and uncle (who are both pilots) where telling me about something similar to this happening at an air show a few months ago. It could very well be real, but I am no expert.
__________________
1999 Ocean Blue Metallic Boxster - blueboxster.com
rick3000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2008, 06:37 AM   #8
FTD
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 834
Certain aspects of it actually made me laugh because of the hokey aspect. My biggest grin is how the wing just so nicely, cleanly and quickly ejected away from the plane, and the plane did not respond to any laws of physics by such a sudden shift in weight and force. Think of this: if you are holding up an object above your head with both arms, and suddenly you lose an arm or a leg, there would have to be a peiod of adjustment to realign the distribution of weight and force to keep the object above your head. I do not see this shift / recovery in this vid. There were a couple of other giggles too.

I think the solid indication that this is fake: notice the landing - the missing wing reappears.
FTD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2008, 07:04 AM   #9
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Milford, Ks.
Posts: 73
Question

That's definately not real. The only airplane that I can think of that only needs one wing to land is the A-10. The bounce is also hokey and if you look close enough at the paint in the end, it definately looks like a model. Pretty good for a doctored up video though.
__________________
-Jeff-
"I'm a glutton for punishment when it comes to my boxster"
'03 S/ PSS9/ B&M short throw/ EVOMS intake/ NHP full exhaust w/ headers / Cantrell MS custom tune
boxster_s_boy_34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page