03-28-2008, 05:55 AM
|
#1
|
Guest
|
Perhaps the day is coming soon when Porsche will have to abandon the protection of the feelings of 911 owners. Let's face it, they could make a super Cayman that would compete in a far more favorable manner, I guess overall sales and proftiability as always guides the decisions of Manufacturers.
|
|
|
03-28-2008, 06:45 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
Well. clearly the Nisan is the fastest lap car, assuming the mag folks can run a timer.
The rest is all just opinion, which is fine.
Specific to looks, I have to say I have grown tired of the 911 style. It is fine to uphold tradition but man, lets generate some imagination for a change.
Hey, your next gen 911 will actually look more like our OLDER last generation car? We are paying stylists to do that?
Ah, what does this spell for 2015?
Again, just an opinion, but I would like to see some original styling out of these guys.
__________________
Rich Belloff
|
|
|
03-28-2008, 08:00 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
|
911 Turbo wasn't as nimble as I thought it would be. granted it was a 996 and not the 997. But I haven't heard of it being radically different albeit radically EXPENSIVE! I'd much rather look forward to a few 10/10's laps in the Z06, that stance and footprint reminds of an LMP.
As for the car doing most of the driving for you like the Nissan. I'm not so sure that's a bad thing. Going that fast in a car with that much oopmh is fun no matter how you slice it. And the average non-professional driver will rarely get close enough to the limit to even know what its like to miss the last few tenths that automation will rob you of taking credit for.
and I'm sure reliability for Nissan will squash that of the Chevy and the expensive to fix German.
p.s. I'll take the Audi R8 over either of the three. Looks like Bugatti Veyron(sp?)
at 1/10 the price. The others look like glorified version of their entry level models.
You have to look close to tell the difference between their entry level versions.
p.s.s
this thread needs pics
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
Last edited by Perfectlap; 03-28-2008 at 08:18 AM.
|
|
|
03-28-2008, 08:53 AM
|
#4
|
Track rat
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern ID
Posts: 3,701
|
The GT-R is blindingly fast. It had a similar experience at Nurbergring. Blind is a good thing 'cause it is monstrous looking.
I am actually surprised the 997 Turbo outran the Z06 at Buttonwillow. It has tons of HP and grip but it's heavy and not usually a great track car. They are often found at the bottom of a track day results page. Novice drivers who bit off more than they can chew I think.
Steve Millen is a great driver. He is a former rally and offroad guy back in my day who later got into open wheel, 24hr Le Mans, and other series and always did very well.
__________________
2009 Cayman 2.9L PDK (with a few tweaks)
PCA-GPX Chief Driving Instructor-Ret.
|
|
|
03-28-2008, 09:25 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
I had a 911T (996) version. I have to say I did not care for the car all that much. Didn['t hate it, just didn't really like it.
Tight inside, not really a good touring car, felt heavy.
Yes, it did run hard when you got on it but all in all, not a very satisfying car to own, at least to me.
__________________
Rich Belloff
|
|
|
03-28-2008, 02:57 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,460
|
Hey, how would a GT3 fare against a 911 Turbo? Would it be faster around the track than the Turbo?
__________________
.
1997 Honda Accord | V6
2004 BMW 330i | ZHP | SOLD
2000 Porsche Boxster | SOLD | http://www.986forum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=9114
http://www.kryzak.com/storage/986sig12.jpg
http://kryzak.tumblr.com
|
|
|
03-28-2008, 03:22 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 846
|
A Stock TT is not as quick at most tracks as the "sharper" and lighter GT3.
As for resale value, thats a tough one two.. You can get a 2001/2002 high mileage 996TT for 50K. Thats less than 1/2 original MSRP. Heck, 993 TTs still trade at or above that mark. When you build more cars (and the 996TT was built in large buckets full compared to the 993) resale value drops.
I'd be curious how many "ad" pages in the new issue are for Nissan though
Sometimes the most expensive isn't the fastest fellas.. afterall, we all know the boxster would spank a Turbo if it had similar hp
__________________
1976 914 2.0
2000 Boxster 2.7 (sold)
1978 911 SC (sold)
1970 914 w/2056 (sold)
|
|
|
03-30-2008, 04:03 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: chicago
Posts: 85
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brucelee
Again, just an opinion, but I would like to see some original styling out of these guys.
|
Agreed... The guys at Zuffenhause needs to work on trying to make the current Porsche look fresh but still timeless and beautiful.
I still would take the 911 turbo over the Nissan (Ideally the GT3).
Perfectlap, you have an old photo. That is the pre-production model. The actual production model is more angular and even more ugly (if that is possible)
__________________
And miles to go before I sleep
2004 986S Silver Anniversary
|
|
|
03-30-2008, 06:27 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
Styling wise, I enjoyed the work on the 944, 968 and 928. Over time, I think these designs have aged well.
__________________
Rich Belloff
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:30 PM.
| |