11-28-2007, 06:39 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 118
|
long, only read if you are really, really, bored, ha ha
Quote:
Originally Posted by brp987
It's interesting that an engine with silicon liners instead of iron, that the iron would be high and the silicon low. 
|
Maybe indicator of valve train wear vs. little wear at bottom end? So far I have heard some comments on other sites that the iron levels are actually low but I would like to hear more on that.
O.k., so how is this for a wild-assed theory (I need a physicist to chime in on this one...)
(1) From what I have heard, silicon levels in the oil basically come down to dirt that is getting in there. There are lots of discussions on the Bob the Oil guy site about the effect of different air cleaners on the amounts of silicon in the sample. For example k and N filters do better as they age resulting in less silicon, etc. etc.
(2) Dirt travels in suspension (air) when there is sufficient velocity to keep it from settling out.
(3) The snorkel on this boxster, if it were in place, provides a small "tunnel" through which lots of air travels at a high velocity
(4) The inlet of the snorkel is very near the outside "grilles" of the car
(5) I have run this car de-snorkeled for a long time
So, is it possible that the lower silicon levels seen in this sample are due to de-snorkling? That is, does desnorkling make it harder for dirt to get to the engine due to lower velocities and/or the fact that the new inlet is around 12" or so farther from the outside air?
Talk about a wild-assed theory...
|
|
|
11-28-2007, 07:12 PM
|
#2
|
Porsche "Purist"
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,123
|
It is interesting that, if I'm reading the comment correctly, the additive package is still 5 times as high as it needs to be.
__________________
1998 Boxster with 7.8 DME, 2005 3.6 liter/325 hp, Variocam Plus, 996 Instrument panel
2001 Boxster original owner. I installed used motor at 89k.
1987 924S. 2002 996TT. PST-2
Owned and repaired Porsches since 1974. Porsche: It's not driving, it's therapy.
|
|
|
11-29-2007, 04:46 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 916
|
Here is what I got:
Ed
__________________
My Car Webpage
2000 2.7L Boxster 102K; TTP intake, headers, high-flow cats; Dansk high-flow muffler; Autothority ECU chip; TechnoTorque 2; Bilstein coilovers; Racing Dynamics strut brace; stress-bar suspension kit; Aasco lightweight flywheel, B&M short shiftkit; 18" wheels; spare tire delete; OEM GT3 seats; JL audio speakers and subwoofer; Alpine PDX-5/PDX-2 amps; Kenwood DNX8120 CD/DVD/Nav; litronics, deambered
|
|
|
11-29-2007, 05:14 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by edevlin
Here is what I got:
Ed

|
Thanks a lot for positng that Ed! Yours looks similar to mine in terms of iron plus the ones I found on bob is the oil guy (BITOG) are in the 20-29 range for iron. Several folks on BITOG have said this iron level is normal (btw lots of folks are critical of Blackstone's comments but generally o.k. with their tests). So it looks to me that using mobil 1 produces about this iron level in Porsches (a generalization I know). I would love to have John V's 11ppm for iron though!
I am planning to run the redline for 7500 miles and take an oil sample at 4000 miles. They say lead and copper will go up with the first 2 oil changes and it will be interesting to see what the iron levels do.
I would love to see Royal Purple results also as others have said here but I need to let the redline "settle in" to get an accurate evaluation of it. Ran redline in a saab 900 turbo for 318k miles and that car ran like brand new with no repairs other than wear items (clutch, water pump, mufflers). Ran mobil 1 (an older formulation I am sure) in a saab 9000 non turbo and it started running hotter and hotter after 200k miles. Not scientific I know but that has been my experience.
|
|
|
11-29-2007, 10:04 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 447
|
My iron jumped to 21 on the last analysis that I did. But again, this oil had a very hard life, two SCCA ProSolos in extreme heat, a national tour plus several local autocrosses. So given all that, I'm extremely happy with the wear behavior.
Attached is my oil report showing my last two oil changes.
|
|
|
11-29-2007, 10:32 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Where the Sewer Meets the Sea, CA. USA
Posts: 2,695
|
Heres some information i copied from the blackstone website to show you usually what metals are representative of which parts of the engine.
-----------------------------------
Elements are quantified in the oil at part per million levels (PPM). This list shows the most common sources of the elements in a gasoline or diesel engine oil.
Aluminum: Pistons, bearings, cases (heads & blocks).
Chromium: Rings, a trace element in steel.
Iron: Cylinders, rotating shafts, the valve train, and any steel part sharing the oil.
Copper : Brass or bronze parts, copper bushings, bearings, oil coolers, also an additive in some gasoline engine oils.
Lead: Bearings.
Tin : Bearings, bronze parts, piston coatings.
Molybdenum: Anti-wear additive, coating on some new rings
(washes off as break-in occurs).
Nickel : Trace element in steel.
Manganese: Trace element, additive in gasoline.
Silver: Trace element.
Titanium: Trace element.
Potassium: Antifreeze inhibitor, additive in some oil types.
Boron: Detergent/dispersant additive, antifreeze inhibitors.
Silicon : Airborne dirt, sealers, gaskets, antifreeze inhibitors.
Sodium: Antifreeze inhibitors, additive in some gasoline engine oils.
Calcium : Detergent/dispersant additive.
Magnesium: Detergent/dispersant additive.
Phosphorus: Anti-wear additive.
Zinc : Anti-wear additive.
Barium: Detergent/dispersant additive.
Physical properties: Viscosity, flashpoint, % fuel and antifreeze, % water and insolubles are all measured in gasoline and diesel engine oils. If fuel is present in the oil, the viscosity and flashpoint will often be lower than what was stated in the "Should be" line. Insolubles are solid material that is centrifuged out of the oil. They are typically free carbon from the oxidation of the oil itself, along with blow-by past the rings.
|
|
|
11-29-2007, 10:49 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John V
My iron jumped to 21 on the last analysis that I did. But again, this oil had a very hard life, two SCCA ProSolos in extreme heat, a national tour plus several local autocrosses. So given all that, I'm extremely happy with the wear behavior.
Attached is my oil report showing my last two oil changes.
|
That looks great especially considering the harder driving and the fact that the "universal averages" are for a 4000 mile interval! Viscosity is low which is consitent with the other M1 tests I have seen. It is this thinning effect that makes me want to try a 5W40.
Buster at BITOG revived this interesting redline 5w40 post on a VW 1.8 tubo that was driven hard.
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=221789&fpart
p.s. I am no redline fanboy but I am very interested in finding the best oil, whatever that may be.
Last edited by saaber; 11-29-2007 at 10:53 AM.
|
|
|
12-06-2007, 04:00 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 15
|
Thanks for posting the oil results, y'all. I am absolutely DYING to see the results of a 20k interval, though, can't one of you cowboy up and do it?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:31 PM.
| |