To the followers of this thread, I find it amusing when after the most hysterical presentation that the planet has 10 years at best etc. When finally an opposing view is presented with back up info. and examples showing the absurdity of real (starvation) as opposed to theoretical calamity, those critics that are not buying into the theory are now labeled as hysterical? Why wasnt the group pushing the global warming theory tagged as hysterical? This is one of the reasons I do not buy it. This name calling is like when one defends the original meaning of the constitution and is therefore labeled a right wing extremist. Sure we must find out what damage is being done, if any and act on it but that is not what is being proposed by the truly hysterical. The adaucity to show Algores movie in public schools without an opposing view is more than hysterical, it is outr
ageous!
986geezer