View Single Post
Old 11-30-2006, 08:02 AM   #12
insite
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,820
my source for the damping rates was the factory shop manual. it doesn't give the numerical values; it only stipulates that they are different. i agree that the shorter RoW spring rates should be higher due to reduced suspension travel. that doesn't necissarily mean that they require additional damping, though. a given spring rate can be adequately damped any number of ways depending upon the desired handling effect; there's not an 'ideal' ratio that mandates a specific damping rate to spring rate.

if anyone knows where to find the numerical compression / rebound damping rates for the various parts, please post. i'm sure a lot of us would like to see what they are.
__________________
insite
'99 Boxster
3.4L Conversion

http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t...1/KMTGPR-1.jpg
insite is offline   Reply With Quote