Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-29-2006, 10:47 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: wv
Posts: 57
intermediate shaft seal and cover

OK guys, I'm deep into the RMS removal and replacement (R&R). The seal has been fairly straightforward w/ no issues - you can see it installed in the pic. After I get this finished, I'll post a more complete story and pic history. However, for now I have a more pressing issue/problem.

The Bentley svc manual only recommends R&R of the 3 bolts on the intermediate shaft cover. But my internet research clearly shows that the recommended preventative measure is to replace the original cover a newer version which has an updated seal design. Upon this recommendation, I pulled the cover. Here's where the problem began - w/ the cover removed, the shaft had nothing to keep it centered in the opening. I am completely surprised, given all the wonderful engineering of the Boxster, that Porsche has done such a poor job of supporting the tail-end of both the crankshaft and the intermediate shaft and thus creating these leak issues. Oh well.... Anyway, the shaft shifted off-center in the opening, apparently under the chain tensioner's loads (see attached pic). Without the shaft being centered in the opening, there is no way to re-install the cover. I've loosened the chain tensioners, which offer no help. The Bentley svc manual doesn't address this issue and I can't find any info on the internet. Can any of you offer experience/insite? Thx.

__________________
02 boxster
chopped 48 Chev pickup (under construction)
99 Harley Road King
04 Honda Element
07 Nissan Murano
rodsnhawgs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2006, 10:55 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 367
I'm WAY out of my league here, but my understanding is that there is some sort of centering tool. I remember seeing a picture of one but I don't recall where. I''ll post if I find it. I'm sure the big guns will be here soon to help you out.

http://www.renntech.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=5306&hl
98Boxster98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2006, 11:00 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 367
Maybe this will help:

http://www.c-speedracing.com/howto/996rms/rms1.php
98Boxster98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2006, 06:37 PM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: wv
Posts: 57
fixed

Thanks 98boxster98. Actually the c-speedracing link is a great documentation of the rms job. However, it doesn't address the problem I encountered. As it turns out, it was a very simple fix once the idea was planted and I felt comfortable "stretching" the chain(s). Another respondee on renntech put me on the idea. There's a good thread there on rms R&R including the intermediate shaft cover/seal issue. The thread ends w/ my question and a response which ended up solving my problem. Actually, a 1/2" drive 9/16 socket fits well in the bearing. By doing so, I was able to exert pressure to center the shaft. Gave enough confidence and experience on the force required I was able to use the new cover, nut, and a large pair of channel locks to pull everything in place. Once centered, I used the retaining nut on the bearing shaft stud to press/pull the cover into the opening perfectly. 3 new bolts and I was good to proceed w/ the rest of the reinstall. Here's the link:
http://www.renntech.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=15&hl=rms&st=20
__________________
02 boxster
chopped 48 Chev pickup (under construction)
99 Harley Road King
04 Honda Element
07 Nissan Murano
rodsnhawgs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2006, 07:10 PM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 367
Hi Rod. I saw that Loren at Renntech provided an answer earlier today and I knew you were in good hands. Gotta admire a man who tackles his own RMS fix.
98Boxster98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2006, 08:23 PM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 3,308
Hi,

I hope you inset the RMS the proper distance. OEM is inset 11mm, but Porsche states to inset replacement seal 13mm to have the lip ride on a virgin, unblemished section of the Crankshaft. Failure to follow this could lead to early failure on the replacement. Don't remember if this is mentioned in the Bentley. Hope this helps...

Happy Motoring!... Jim'99
MNBoxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2006, 05:03 AM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: wv
Posts: 57
seal inset

Yes, I set it @ 13 mm. Although there was no "feel" of a groove, there was a definite visible mark. Thanks for the reminder though MN. BTW, I used the new "Cayenne" style RMS.
__________________
02 boxster
chopped 48 Chev pickup (under construction)
99 Harley Road King
04 Honda Element
07 Nissan Murano

Last edited by rodsnhawgs; 06-30-2006 at 05:08 AM. Reason: spelling correction
rodsnhawgs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2006, 10:56 AM   #8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: wv
Posts: 57
Thumbs up rms cost

I'll post pics of the RMS r&r (removal and replacement) sometime next week. Until then, I just wanted to give you a quick heads up on the cost. Total cost, including changing the oil (synthetic and OE filter): <$150.00 US

Parts:
gen4 Cayenne style RMS
intermediate shaft cover
4 block bolts
3 intermediate shaft bolts
8 flexplate bolts
8 qts Mobil1
1 Porsche OE filter

My labor was free

Back on the road leak-free
__________________
02 boxster
chopped 48 Chev pickup (under construction)
99 Harley Road King
04 Honda Element
07 Nissan Murano

Last edited by rodsnhawgs; 07-20-2006 at 10:57 AM. Reason: mispelled cayenne
rodsnhawgs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2006, 12:07 PM   #9
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 3,417
Send a message via AIM to blinkwatt
This has to be one of the most impressive D.I.Y. I have heard of around here. Did you do it at home in garage? What did you use to lower the transmission?
__________________
-99' Zenith Blue 5-spd...didn't agree with a center divider on the freeway
-01' S Orient Red Metallic 6-spd...money pit...sold to buy a house
blinkwatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2006, 12:43 PM   #10
KronixSpeed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hey question? what is the difference between the old style seal and the new?

"I used the new "Cayenne" style RMS."

i also have this new seal when my rms was fixed last year november. is it really
better is pretty much my question?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2006, 06:16 AM   #11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 3,308
Quote:
Originally Posted by KronixSpeed
hey question? what is the difference between the old style seal and the new?

"I used the new "Cayenne" style RMS."

i also have this new seal when my rms was fixed last year november. is it really
better is pretty much my question?

Hi,

My understanding is that it's design (profile) and perhaps it's material composition make it more pliable and better able to adapt to a Crankshaft opening in the Block which is not exactly centered on the Crank's spin axis.

But, it still amounts to only a better Band-Aid and I am a little skeptical because I don't think this latest fix has racked up that many miles to be deemed a once-and-for-all fix of the issue. We can only hope...

Happy Motoring!... Jim'99
MNBoxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 10:52 AM   #12
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: wv
Posts: 57
rms r & r

As promised, here's a few pics in successive threads. I'll make a few comments along w/ the pics. Also, refer to the links that are noted/notable resources. There are others on the "net", but these are a couple of really good ones.

First, let me say that even though this could be a "driveway" job, as you'll see from the pics, my shop is well equipped which made it much easier and safer. Second, this job is not beyond the capabilities of any of you with a decent level of mechanical aptitude and most basic hand tools. You may need to buy, borrow, or rent a few tools, but the offset in labor saved would be well worth the investment in my opinion. OK, let's get to it:

The Bentley Svc manual shows an engine support tool to "hang" the engine from while the transmission is removed. This is because the downward forces on the engine/trans are supported by the (transmission) rear mounts. Anyway, I made the same rig out of a 2X4, a piece of allthread , and a short section of chain (see pic). This allows for adjustment up/down and support w/ the trans removed. The other pic shows the car on the rack w/ rear supported on jack stands so the wheels and axles can turn.
__________________
02 boxster
chopped 48 Chev pickup (under construction)
99 Harley Road King
04 Honda Element
07 Nissan Murano
rodsnhawgs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 11:04 AM   #13
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: wv
Posts: 57
rms r &r

The next thing I encountered was the torque applied to the rear axle hub retaining nuts. There is no reference to this in the Bentley so let me tell you what it is... 340 foot pounds. I found this out from the tech at the local dealership. BTW, it's not a bad idea to go in and establish a little relationship w/ this guy so you can pick his brain and work station computer if need be...

Anyway, with that spec revealed, I knew what kind of forces I'd need to apply to remove the nuts.

The rest of the removal was very straightforward w/ no surprises. In actuallity, I found the Boxster to be fairly easy to work on. Most items are reasonably accessible, the fasteners are stainless steel, and the specialized tools that the Bentley shows are easily substituted w/ a little thought.

Here's a pic w/ the RMS drip before I started; the exhaust removed; a couple of others w/ the transmission removed. As you can see, this is a tiptronic car.
__________________
02 boxster
chopped 48 Chev pickup (under construction)
99 Harley Road King
04 Honda Element
07 Nissan Murano

Last edited by rodsnhawgs; 08-01-2006 at 11:07 AM. Reason: pic change
rodsnhawgs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 11:33 AM   #14
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: wv
Posts: 57
rms r & r

Now we're down to it. With the flexplate (flywheel on standard cars) removed, the offending RMS is exposed. This is the old style seal - if you'll refer to the Renntech link, you can see and read all about these and how the newer Cayenne style seal is the latest replacement. My personal opinion on the seal failures, based on limited knowledge here...:

The material of construction (MOC) appears to have been incorrect for the application. However, this is secondary to the design flaw of the crank support (or lack of) at the rear of the block. I think these two issues are what cause the RMS leak issue. W/ the crank unsupported, the rotating mass and associated harmonics make it impossible to maintain a straight axis through the crank centerline. Lots of heat is generated as the seal "rubs" on the rear crank causing the seal to become less pliable over time. As the seal hardens and the harmonics continue, oil naturally finds a path out. My/our hope, given the fact that Porsche has decided to ignor the unsupported crank issue, is that the new seal MOC will maintain its integrity and thus eliminate/reduce the number of seal failures we're seeing. It's a bandaid fix, but if it works....

OK, on to the show: Here you can see the leaky seal ( 2 pics). With the seal removed, the pics show the wear mark on the crank (please excuse the out of focus pic). In my case, the seal did not wear a groove in the crank, but only left a score mark. My guess is that some failures are a result of an actual groove left in the crank - check this closely. Part of the recommended r & r is that the new seal be set deeper into the block (see thread below). I concur... I also followed the recommendation that the four block bolts and three intermediate shaft bolts be replaced. This is cheap insurance if you're this deep into the project. With the seal replaced, the reassembly is again straightforward. If you go to my first post in this thread (int shaft seal...) you can see the new seal installed in the pic. I replaced all eight flexplate bolts w/ new ones (once again as cheap insurance @ $1 each). Use locktight blue on them as Porsche bolts don't use any type of lockwasher. Please refer to the links below for more details.
__________________
02 boxster
chopped 48 Chev pickup (under construction)
99 Harley Road King
04 Honda Element
07 Nissan Murano

Last edited by rodsnhawgs; 08-01-2006 at 11:38 AM. Reason: addtl text
rodsnhawgs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 11:58 AM   #15
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: wv
Posts: 57
rms r & r

A few items worth noting. Apparently Porsche uses two different size fasteners on the inboard half-shaft hubs. The dealer tech cautioned me (and I you) to be sure to torque these to the correct specs. On the tiptronic cars, the starter must be removed to access the torque converter bolts - be sure to use a suitable retainer, as shown in the Bentley, on the torque converter so it doesn't fall out when removing the transmission. I also stuffed a rag in the starter/trans opening so I wouldn't drop a torque converter bolt down in the trans bellhousing when going in or out with these bolts. I had all the parts in-hand before I started so as to avoid untimely delays.

One other thing that bears noting. I didn't use the go/no-go tool to measure the opening. I didn't use the Porsche seal installation tool either. Because I've worked on cars most of my life, and have a good selection of tools and measuring devices I was able to do this without these specialized tools. Use your own judgement as to your abilities. Be honest with yourself - you may want to opt for these tools - again, probably a good investment.

So far, so good...as noted below, total parts cost was less than $150 US. If you attempt this yourself, go slow, refer to the good folks here and on other sites often, and be safe.
__________________
02 boxster
chopped 48 Chev pickup (under construction)
99 Harley Road King
04 Honda Element
07 Nissan Murano
rodsnhawgs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2006, 05:27 AM   #16
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,518
rodsnhawgs, thanks so much for sharing this !

How long did this take total ? Did you finish in one day or spend multiple days ?
NickCats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2006, 05:48 AM   #17
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: wv
Posts: 57
NickCats: Because I was in a learning curve (Boxster is a new animal to me) it took longer than a Porsche tech of course... but even so, I did it over about 3 days and probably 18 hours total. I lost a lot of time w/ the intermediate shaft problem (recall the original post on this thread). I'd say if I had to do it again in the near future (let's hope not!), I could probably do it in 10-12 hours. I'd be interested in knowing what the Porsche flat rate calls for... anyone know?
__________________
02 boxster
chopped 48 Chev pickup (under construction)
99 Harley Road King
04 Honda Element
07 Nissan Murano
rodsnhawgs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2006, 07:15 AM   #18
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,518
I was quoted $951 for the RMS. At $130 an hour I figure 7 hrs of labor...

NickCats is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page