Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-12-2013, 09:32 AM   #1
l3m
Registered User
 
l3m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 188
Took a Durametric capture last Sunday

I have a 2001 with a 3.2L engine. The car had 28K on the odometer when the engine was replaced in Sept. 2005. The car was at 30K when I purchased it in Sept 2011 and has had 3 oil changes since then. The car now has 42K. I'm guessing I have the dual row bearing but with a remanufactured engine, I can't be certain.

I purchased a Durametric recently and started researching about camshaft deviation values. Basically the message I got was as long as the idle values are steady, that means the IMSB is ok. Also, the difference between cam 1 & 2 should be +/- 6.

Last Sunday I attach the Durametric and start the car. I let it idle for about 10 mins. then I head out on the road. I take surface roads and drive under 3000 rpm for 20-30 mins. until I feel the engine is warmed up properly. Then it's all freeway speeds and occasional bursts over 4K rpm until I get home. I drove for 1 hour. I graphed the cam 1/2 values and posted the graph below.

As you can see cam2 is mostly steady at 0.34 and going up slightly to 0.36 in the last 10 mins.

For cam1, it starts at -4.44 then decreases to -5.23 while the car is still idling. I remember leaving the house and seeing -5.23 on the durametric screen. It stays at -5.23 for 14 mins then starts creeping back up. When I'm nearing home, it finally settles at -4.64 and stays steady until I turn off the engine.

Why would the car start at -4.44 and suddenly jump to -5.23 during warm-up? Is there any reason to be concerned about these changing values? Any input would be greatly appreciated.



__________________
'01 S

Last edited by l3m; 02-13-2013 at 01:31 AM.
l3m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2013, 11:05 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Miami florida
Posts: 1,591
For what its worth, I get similar results. Bank 2 is always very steady and hardly changes cold to hot, bank 1, on the other hand, goes from about -6.3 cold, to -5.5 hot. My understanding is that when you have variations at idle over the short term then that could be a sign the IMSB is failing.
__________________
Current car

2000 Boxster 2.7l red/black

Previous cars

1973 Opel Manta
1969(?) Fiat 850 Convertible
1979 Lancia Beta Coupe
1981 Alfa Romeo GTV 6
1985 Alfa Romeo Graduate
1985 Porsche 944
1989 Porsche 944
1981 Triumph TR7
1989 (?) Alfa Romeo Milano
1993 Saab 9000
san rensho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2013, 01:30 PM   #3
l3m
Registered User
 
l3m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 188
Quote:
Originally Posted by san rensho View Post
For what its worth, I get similar results. Bank 2 is always very steady and hardly changes cold to hot, bank 1, on the other hand, goes from about -6.3 cold, to -5.5 hot. My understanding is that when you have variations at idle over the short term then that could be a sign the IMSB is failing.
That's good to know. I wasn't sure if the values were supposed to be consistent hot or cold. This 1st time I used the tool I only used it for 10 minutes. I was seeing the values change on bank 1 and 2 during idle and it got me worried.
__________________
'01 S

Last edited by l3m; 02-12-2013 at 01:32 PM.
l3m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2013, 05:14 PM   #4
Track rat
 
Topless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern ID
Posts: 3,701
Garage
Consider this a baseline and your car is within factory tolerances so no worries. Check it again after each oil change and note any sudden unusual differences.

I have said this before but more ulcers and heart conditions have been caused by staring at a Durametric screen than actual IMS failures.
__________________
2009 Cayman 2.9L PDK (with a few tweaks)
PCA-GPX Chief Driving Instructor-Ret.
Topless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2013, 06:41 PM   #5
Registered User
 
com3dorm3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Topless View Post
I have said this before but more ulcers and heart conditions have been caused by staring at a Durametric screen than actual IMS failures.
Hmm. I've never used this tool. I'm wondering if this is the case of "ignorance is bliss"??
__________________
2000 Boxster S
com3dorm3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 10:41 AM   #6
Registered User
 
jaykay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 2,668
What is the sample time? The time scale the top is hard to see. This might be reasonable if the sample time is long. mine are always flat lines but I am looking at 3-5 min at most

Experts?

__________________
986 00S
jaykay is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page