Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-29-2011, 11:54 AM   #1
Track rat
 
Topless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern ID
Posts: 3,701
Garage
Lots of different ideas on this. I looked into engine mods a few years ago as I used to hot rod a lot of Fords, Chevys, Hondas, and Nissans. With very few exceptions I found engine mods on a 2.5L to be just a big black hole for Benjamins. Very little performance return/dollar spent.

FWIW every Boxster class track record on the West Coast was done in a car with a stock motor. No turbos, no chips, no plenums, no nothin. They did their mods on suspension, weight loss and tires. This is where I am doing my R&D.

Ultimately it is your car and your dough. Do whatever you think will make your car what you want it to be.
__________________
2009 Cayman 2.9L PDK (with a few tweaks)
PCA-GPX Chief Driving Instructor-Ret.
Topless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2011, 12:35 PM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Novi Mi.
Posts: 194
The best and only good mod, for the 2.5 IMO is an under pulley W/ harmonic dampener cheap and easy DIY and a 10hp. Gain for about $ 175.00

If that is not enough buy another Boxster W/ a larger motor.
jbs986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2011, 04:09 AM   #3
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Just a side note: the boxster engine has Lokasil lined cylinder walls which CANNOT be bored out
Incorrect.
We have had extremely positive results with taking the stock 85.5mm 2.5 bore size and boring that to an 89mm using the technology we co-developed with LN Engineering.

We just finished a big bore 2.5 that made just over 200 RWHP with stock intake, stock exhaust and no ECU tuning at all.

The 2.5 is the first engine we began development of and the technology to perform a big bore solution for this engine is the oldest and most proven of all our developments. 89mm is the largest we can go with the technology, which produces a 2.7 when coupled to the stock 2.5 crank and 2.9 liters when coupled to the 78mm crank found in the 2.7. The 2.7 uses the same factory bore as the 2.5 @ 85.5mm, its basically a "stroker" 2.5 engine.

All that said, I have found that the 2.5 engine is the best developed from the factory as far as power is concerned, the UD pulley is about the only real power maker I have seen to date.

I refuse to compromise anything for performance, so I am not big on ECU tuning, exhaust implementation and etc. My direct experience with all of these has generally been a compromise of some other important aspect associated with drive-ability.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page