05-25-2010, 08:01 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hampstead, NC
Posts: 41
|
De Snorkeled! Does it negatively effect HP or torque?
Just de snorkeled my 99 porsche boxster. The difference in sound is great! One question, does it negatively effect HP or torque at all? If you've de snorkeled your boxster feel free to take a minute and describe the effects...your experience will be useful to those who are researching this simple mod.
__________________
99 2.5L Boxster: 135,800 miles, AVIC-Z2 In-dash navigation/DVD receiver w/bypass switch, made and installed Pedro's hi flow air intake, custom laser engraved wind-stop, hacked convertible top relay, de snorkeled.
Last edited by Pianohawk; 05-26-2010 at 07:45 AM.
|
|
|
05-26-2010, 12:12 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Africa, Cape Town
Posts: 131
|
de-snorkle
On my 2000 S it def. did nothing negative. Awesome sound and better response. Generally a better feel. Recommend this mod. to all.
__________________
de-snorkeled, clear lights, sports exhaust, zeintec hard top, zein wing, B&M short shifter, DesignTek lowering springs, DesignTek carbon fibre strut brace front and rear, 18'' carerra 5 spokes, semi slick tyres, entire soft top delete, engine cover delete,red console,L&N deep sump, volo performance chip, raptor shift light, de-cat'ed, OEM GT3 bucket seats.
|
|
|
05-26-2010, 09:15 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Du Monde
Posts: 2,199
|
There has never been any quantitative data released on de-snorkeling. All the info. is, to-date, just anecdotal.
The snorkel's intended purpose is to meet noise abatement laws in some countries, especially Switzerland and it was included in models for all markets (since the legislative environment is always changing).
My personal opinion is that it neither positively or negatively affects performance, but greatly improves the intake sound of the motor. My car is de-snorkelled.
Plus, if you're careful and don't damage it on removal, it is totally reversable. So there really is no downside to trying it.
Cheers!
|
|
|
05-26-2010, 12:03 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California
Posts: 713
|
Bisimoto had a thread where he dyno'd before and after the desnorkeling. It gained power. Runs were on a dynapack...
Thread is here on 986forum...
__________________
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3420/...90927559_o.jpg
Some stuff for sale: M030 S 24mm front sway bar, M030 base 19.6mm rear sway bar, 996 GT3 OEM Porsche Motorsport front strut mounts monoball "camber plates"
WTB: looking for some 5-7mm spacers with extended bolts
|
|
|
05-26-2010, 02:16 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Central PA
Posts: 49
|
I was ambivalent about it, until I spoke with Jaay (whose posts are all over this forum). So I removed the snorkel. I agree with what he told me: “Just look at the snorkel.” There is a very significant narrowing at the end closest to the side air vent. I just got the snorkel and traced the inside of both ends as best I could, just to take a look. Without getting out my protractor and brushing up on my geometry, I would guess that there is about a 40-50% reduction in size from the large end compared to the small end.
Now, how many people spend all lots of cash to increase the diameter of the air intake system in order to improve airflow. You cannot convince me that the small end of the snorkel does not constrict airflow, even if only a little.
Did I notice a difference in performance? Not sure. I like to think I did, but it could all be in my head… in any case, I'm keeping it out.
|
|
|
05-26-2010, 03:15 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bothell, WA
Posts: 279
|
Isn't there increased risk of cigarette ingestion after de-snorkeling?
__________________
'01 Boxster S, 51k miles
'05 Mazda 6 Grand Touring Wagon
|
|
|
06-02-2010, 02:21 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 91
|
Thinking about this, the diameter of the snorkel from one end to the other should not really matter. In dealing with fluids, there are two things to distinguish between: flow speed and flow rate. Flow speed is just the instantaneous speed of a molecule of fluid (in this case, air). Flow rate is the amount of fluid passing a cross-sectional area given a unit of time. Flow rate is what we're interested in if we want more horsepower, torque, etc.
Though the snorkel does converge in, I don't think removing it would do anything to increase the flow rate of the air. You have to remember that the end where the snorkel connected is same diameter as that end of the snorkel. So, even if you do remove it, the size of the hole for the air to be sucked in is still the same.
Quote:
Originally Posted by backman_z
I was ambivalent about it, until I spoke with Jaay (whose posts are all over this forum). So I removed the snorkel. I agree with what he told me: “Just look at the snorkel.” There is a very significant narrowing at the end closest to the side air vent. I just got the snorkel and traced the inside of both ends as best I could, just to take a look. Without getting out my protractor and brushing up on my geometry, I would guess that there is about a 40-50% reduction in size from the large end compared to the small end.
Now, how many people spend all lots of cash to increase the diameter of the air intake system in order to improve airflow. You cannot convince me that the small end of the snorkel does not constrict airflow, even if only a little.
Did I notice a difference in performance? Not sure. I like to think I did, but it could all be in my head… in any case, I'm keeping it out.
|
__________________
Parts for sale: 4-spoke Steering wheel, air bag, and leather cover ($350 + shipping), Rear zipper storage bin ($100 + shipping), CDR-210 Factory OEM radio, casing, and keys ($100 + shipping), Hand brake handle and hand brake sensor ($50 + shipping), Manual factory leather shift knob ($Free + shipping)
|
|
|
09-03-2010, 10:35 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 1
|
The main issue with airflow in engine intakes is usually not getting enough air.
If that was the case the all motors would just have huge intakes, throttle bodies and intake valves.
In the mid eighties engine designers learned that they could increase horsepower in certain ranges of engine RPM by tuning intake designs.
Air flowing into an engine is not like a water pipe flowing. The air in the intake is in a constant state of fluctuating pressure. Almost a vibration.
By tuning inlet length to a certain vibration frequency, You can increase intake pressure at that frequency. This can be compared to the resonators on a pipe organ.
Engine designers will often use this to fill in "flat spots"in the power delivery.
By removing the snorkel you could be creating dips in the power curve of your engine. This can be verified with a dyno chart showing dips at certain RPMs.
Then again, they also use these things to quiet induction noise. This might be done at the expense of proper flow.
So, if some one wants to do a proper dyno run with before and after charts, we might be able to see whats actually going on.
Otherwise, do it if you like the noise.
And remember louder doesn't always mean faster.
|
|
|
09-03-2010, 07:05 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 173
|
When I had my engine rebuilt (bought it that way), I had mine desnorkled as well as the resonator box removed. The wrench filled in the hole as well as smothed the filler so it was clean. I don't know what the car was before, but it does sound sweet now. The one upgrade I did that seems to make it better was the Sprint booster. The throttle respons is great and what I have noticed with two tanks of gas is an improvement in my gas milege. Close to 4 MPG/CDN better! I leave it in the sport mode.
__________________
2002 Boxster S Seal Grey
2010 Ford F150 FX4 Luxury
Retired after 38 years with the same company.
|
|
|
09-05-2010, 01:37 AM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,522
|
I've de-snorkeled twice now and replaced back to standard twice...
Its just my butt dyno, but I seem to be missing something in the 3-4000 rpm mid range. Nothing wrong with the sound - it just seems that I'm not getting as much torque with the snorkel removed. So I put it back in!!
Maybe its senile decay setting in....
__________________
2001 Boxster S (triple black). Sleeping easier with LN Engineering/Flat 6 IMS upgrade, low temp thermostat & underspeed pulley.
2001 MV Agusta F4.
|
|
|
09-08-2010, 12:04 AM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: melbourne
Posts: 64
|
Im getting my Ecu reflashed tommorow on the dyno,
would it be a good idea to do this mod 1st?
thanks guys
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:28 AM.
| |