Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat
Register Garage FAQ Community Calendar

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-05-2009, 05:11 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 46
Correct. They pulley does not create horsepower it only reduces the factors that rob hp from the motor. Another way to think of it is that the motor is just an air pump. It sucks, bangs and blows. If you don't change the amount of air it sucks or how big the bang is or how it blows you do no "create" hp.

That said all we really care about is how much hp we have at the wheels not how we get it, and the pulley does work.
amondc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 05:34 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: California
Posts: 73
... sorry, I asked the question the wrong way. I know it doesn't create HP, I was just surprised at the estimate of 10 extra available to the drive train... that's pretty darn good for just an external pulley change.

I've been thinking about the pulley and instead of full A/C delete, just go with the shorter belt and eliminate the A/C drag from the equation. This pushes me a little farther along.

You're right about the weight, that compressor feels like it weighs 20 lbs. alone... the whole system ought to net 40ish?... no?


thanks,



kj
Boxster44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 05:49 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 46
no worries boxster44. I think the reason there is such a large gain is because you are slowing down all the accessories but Jake can give us a much better answer.

and yes if you remove all the a/c stuff you will pull about 35-40lbs out of the car.
amondc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 06:21 AM   #4
Porscheectomy
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 3,011
Spinning the water pump, alternator, and AC compressor takes power. In the case of the pump and compressor, that power increases by the third order with speed. In other words, it takes 8 times more power to drive a pump twice as fast.

You can imagine that if you spin the pumps more slowly, more of the engine's power can go to twisting the wheels. And because of the third order relationship the faster you spin the engine, the more power is saved compared to a larger pulley.

The drawback is that at engine lower speeds, the pumps may not flow sufficient water to keep the engine cool in an extreme environment, or the alternator may not provide enough current to a car with a very high draw stereo with the lights on.

As Mr. Raby has found, everythimg works fine in his region.
blue2000s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 07:16 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southern New jersey
Posts: 1,054
I surprised that no manufacturer has gone to an electric water pump, with it's speed electronically controlled. There's lot's of power and efficiency to be gained, though I'm not sure it would ever be as reliable as a belt driven pump. (though Boxster water pumps haven't proved that reliable!)
stephen wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 08:21 AM   #6
Track rat
 
Topless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern ID
Posts: 3,701
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephen wilson
I surprised that no manufacturer has gone to an electric water pump, with it's speed electronically controlled. There's lot's of power and efficiency to be gained, though I'm not sure it would ever be as reliable as a belt driven pump. (though Boxster water pumps haven't proved that reliable!)
I am not sure if any benefits would be found here. Having a mechanical WP that varies with engine speed is a good thing. Higher RPMs = higher heat = higher coolant velocity. Also electricity is not free. With an electric water pump, first you must convert mechanical energy to electrical energy with the alternator (maybe 20% loss) and then convert it back to mechanical energy at the pump (maybe another 20% loss). By this very rough calculation an electric pump would consume 40% more energy than a mechanical one for the same coolant velocity. The mechanical pump looks better to me. What am I missing?
__________________
2009 Cayman 2.9L PDK (with a few tweaks)
PCA-GPX Chief Driving Instructor-Ret.
Topless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 08:38 AM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Topless
I am not sure if any benefits would be found here. Having a mechanical WP that varies with engine speed is a good thing. Higher RPMs = higher heat = higher coolant velocity. Also electricity is not free. With an electric water pump, first you must convert mechanical energy to electrical energy with the alternator (maybe 20% loss) and then convert it back to mechanical energy at the pump (maybe another 20% loss). By this very rough calculation an electric pump would consume 40% more energy than a mechanical one for the same coolant velocity. The mechanical pump looks better to me. What am I missing?

There are significant advantages to an electrically driven water pump:

1. Reduced mechanical drag on the engine (frees up HP); the higher the engine revs, the more power is saved (drag goes up with engine speed).
2. Slows down the circulation of coolant to a constant speed (higher RPM’s actually reduce the ability of the coolant to exchange heat with the air at the radiators because it is moving too fast).
3. Compact; no pulley or belt is required, so it takes up less space.
4. Works if the belt fails.

By-the-by, electrically driven water pumps are commonly used on race engines for the above reasons……………

Te primary reason that more aftermarket manufacturers are not involved with making them for the M96 engine is the small population size of the application.
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 07:09 AM   #8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The City
Posts: 1,084
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxster44
... sorry, I asked the question the wrong way. I know it doesn't create HP, I was just surprised at the estimate of 10 extra available to the drive train... that's pretty darn good for just an external pulley change.

I've been thinking about the pulley and instead of full A/C delete, just go with the shorter belt and eliminate the A/C drag from the equation. This pushes me a little farther along.

You're right about the weight, that compressor feels like it weighs 20 lbs. alone... the whole system ought to net 40ish?... no?


thanks,



kj
im sure that is what you meant anyways but its good to clarify for people who come on here and may not know. but yes im not sure how much the whole AC weighs but it is substantial.

if money is no object. (but usually it is!)

you could do AC delete and replace all panels on the body with Fiberglass or carbonfiber and that would net you quite a bit of weight. I have also heard that the sound proofing removal is quite good too.
Lobo1186 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 10:17 AM   #9
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: California
Posts: 73
Lobo,

Yes..... I think amondC (Chris, right?) can really go into detail there as I believe he's with the Spec Boxster group in Texas and they do lots of things with their cars.

kj
Boxster44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 06:34 PM   #10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxster44
Lobo,

Yes..... I think amondC (Chris, right?) can really go into detail there as I believe he's with the Spec Boxster group in Texas and they do lots of things with their cars.

kj
Thats me!!
amondc is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2026 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page