Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-06-2007, 03:01 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 150
Dyno Proven 231WHP 986 Boxster S.

For all those who reckon it's waste of time and money trying to extract more power from the already fine tuned Porsche Boxster here we have the results that will make you think twice.

My baseline dyno graph



This was dynoed when the car was completely stock. Done in 4th gear. Didn't bother to open up the engine compartment thus no rpm readings.

As you can see at higher speed(=rpm) there are many inconsistent dips on the graph this is where I expect an aftermarket headers would improve over stock headers. Im also interested to hear what do you think the cause of these "dips" might be?


Dyno comparison, stock vs aftermarket headers



In this graph the power curve explains itself. Noticeable gain across the whole rev range. 7WHP increase at the peak.

How much is this mod you ask. $475US and you can install it yourself.

Let me know what you think

panameras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 06:27 AM   #2
Track rat
 
Topless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern ID
Posts: 3,701
Garage
I am a little confused here. What changes did you make to your car to get the 5hp increase in your first set of graphs? What changes did you make to go from 167hp in the first set to 224hp in the second graph? That is a sizeable power increase. As I read it the second graph shows a before/after header install increase of 7hp which is pretty close to others findings. Can you clarify?
__________________
2009 Cayman 2.9L PDK (with a few tweaks)
PCA-GPX Chief Driving Instructor-Ret.
Topless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 06:33 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Where the Sewer Meets the Sea, CA. USA
Posts: 2,695
Send a message via MSN to CJ_Boxster
I dont know, 77hp increase from only Headers.... Doesnt sound right.
__________________
--Proud Boxster Owner/Tech,

Carlos J Cazares

FastForward Performance
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a1...er/newsig1.jpg
CJ_Boxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 06:48 AM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 846
I too am a bit confused... especially since, generically, I have experienced a 15-20% difference between Whp and flywheel hp.. thus 231 whp x .15 yields 265 flywheel hp, which isn't far off Porsches typically conservative HPO rating of 252-258 depending on year.

While I have never said you couldn't get more HP, one should realize that for a "world" market that uses the car under all sorts of conditions, certainly Porsche leaves some HP on the table...
__________________
1976 914 2.0
2000 Boxster 2.7 (sold)
1978 911 SC (sold)
1970 914 w/2056 (sold)
racer_d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 06:55 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,518
Look at the graphs a little closer...

1st graph ( baseline ) is metric - Speed ( km / hr ) & Power ( kW ).

2nd graph is Speed ( mph ) & Power ( hp )


1st graph is showing stock with no work ( but in metric measurements ) with four runs of 162, 163, 164 & 167 kW ( not hp )

2nd graph is comparing no headers ( blue line - 224 hp ) and headers ( red line - 231 hp )

Nick
__________________
*
http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r...s/DSC03717.jpg

1999 986 ( Black )
1998 MB C280 ( Black )
1999 BMW K1200RS ( Yellow )
2005 Audi A4 ( Red )
NickCats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 06:59 AM   #6
Pat
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 456
Hell, who cares about 7 hp at the peak. There's a difference of 25+ hp at 103 mph in the measured gear! Not to mention all the area under the curve throughout most of the range tested.
__________________
"Of all the extreme sports I've ever participated in- windsurfing, kite boarding, wake boarding, tow-in surfing and snowboarding- skiing, for me, made everything else easy."
-Chuck Patterson
Pat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 07:22 AM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,311
He doesn't say what brand or who made the headers either?

I wonder what they are. 4-2-1 or 4 into 1??? Please let us know where you bought them and what brand they are.
porsche986spyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 07:58 AM   #8
Track rat
 
Topless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern ID
Posts: 3,701
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickCats
Look at the graphs a little closer...

1st graph ( baseline ) is metric - Speed ( km / hr ) & Power ( kW ).

2nd graph is Speed ( mph ) & Power ( hp )


1st graph is showing stock with no work ( but in metric measurements ) with four runs of 162, 163, 164 & 167 kW ( not hp )

2nd graph is comparing no headers ( blue line - 224 hp ) and headers ( red line - 231 hp )

Nick
I see. So what you are saying is he had a 7hp increase during his baseline runs with no changes, under very similar run conditions (margin of error) and a 7hp increase after header install, 8 months later, 25F cooler ambient temp., higher barometric pressure, higher humidity, different tank of gas, different tire wear etc. etc.

Don't misunderstand me. I believe a 7hp increase is possible and I appreciate his efforts to document performance changes to his car. I just get frustrated when I see a margin of error that exceeds reported gains. Everything below the margin of error is just background noise. I am afraid we have not learned very much.

I think Bisimoto has some of the most detailed and carefully controlled dyno runs I have seen on a Boxter and still there is some margin of error. By repeating before/after results he has proven a measureable hp increase which exceeds the margin of error by desnorkling his car. Clearly the snorkle is a Porsche compromise for intake noise abatement and to prevent possible water injestion. I hope more studies are done this way so we can get "proven results" on performance mods. Until then we don't really know what increases in performance are possible.
__________________
2009 Cayman 2.9L PDK (with a few tweaks)
PCA-GPX Chief Driving Instructor-Ret.

Last edited by Topless; 09-06-2007 at 08:16 AM.
Topless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 08:02 AM   #9
Pat
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 456
Topless,
You raise some good points, and I appreciate your attention to detail.
Most of the factors you cited as variables that could invalidate the findings are corrected for using SAE standards. Yes, I know that's not ideal, but it's the best we have to work with. I am not as concerned with the differing test conditions as you are.
__________________
"Of all the extreme sports I've ever participated in- windsurfing, kite boarding, wake boarding, tow-in surfing and snowboarding- skiing, for me, made everything else easy."
-Chuck Patterson
Pat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 08:25 AM   #10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: chicago
Posts: 3,510
Send a message via AIM to djomlas
wow, how do you post results without telling what product/brand you used?
__________________
http://i34.tinypic.com/157yslk.jpg
"I couldn't find the sports car of my dreams, so I built it myself." ~F. Porsche
Gemballa springs::litronics::Eurotech 18s(275/225)::B&M::MOMO wheel::
exhaust cutouts::EVOcoldair intake::OEM smoked tails & sidemarkers::

colormatched bumperettes::Top Speed Pro-1 exhaust::
my cardomain/pictures page
djomlas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 09:09 AM   #11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 150
Nick is spot on. First graph is showing figures in KW, all 4 runs were performed within minutes of each other, no variables been changed and 167kw was the best of them.

Second graph is showing in Horse Power. 224hp(167kw) vs 231hp. Only modification been a set of aftermarket headers.

Other than different room temperature and humidity, I tried my best to keep everything else constant. same type of fuel (BP Ultimate 98RON). same set of tyres with the same tyre pressure. I don't drive the car much so there were minimal tyre wear (about 2000kms of 80% highway driving).

Therefore there were indeed variables in test conditions, However the most important finding is what PAT mentioned "There's a difference of 25+ hp at 103 mph in the measured gear! Not to mention all the area under the curve throughout most of the range tested."

Now for the non believers, yes it is possible to get a few horse power gains here and there due to a cooler room temperature but looking at the graph how do you explain major gains of up to 25hp across the entire rev range. If you still think it was due to margins of error, well, you obviously know better than me and I have no reason to prove to you any further.

Im not going into too much details of the brand of headers I used as Im not promoting anyones business. What I can say is they are 4 into 1 design headers that you can buy off ebay for around $500US (I believe there are at least 3 different vendors that are selling them under their own brand names but are sourced from a same manufactorer) Again Im not associated with any of them, just trying share my findings with fellow boxster owners of a worthwhile performance "enhancement" that I would recommend.

Last edited by panameras; 09-06-2007 at 09:13 AM.
panameras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 09:20 AM   #12
Pat
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 456
Dyno graphs are great tools.
What I care about, however, is how the car drives. How much of a difference would you say this made in your car's seat-of-the-pants performance/feel?
Yes, I know this is subjective, but if you could expand on how the car feels before and after I would appreciate it.
__________________
"Of all the extreme sports I've ever participated in- windsurfing, kite boarding, wake boarding, tow-in surfing and snowboarding- skiing, for me, made everything else easy."
-Chuck Patterson
Pat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 01:30 PM   #13
Track rat
 
Topless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern ID
Posts: 3,701
Garage
Thank you again Panameras for posting your dyno results. Your curves do look promising and are consistent with others findings. This just adds another piece to the 986 knowledge base and raises even more questions about realistic performance gains on these cars.

The next step is for someone to test how much real world gain these headers produce by running some 1/8 mile, 1/4 mile, and lap times on a track they already have wired to get a good baseline. Then repeat the process after installing the headers. That is the kind of testing most racing teams are doing. A 1/2 sec. per lap over a day long race often is the difference between 1st and 20th place.
__________________
2009 Cayman 2.9L PDK (with a few tweaks)
PCA-GPX Chief Driving Instructor-Ret.
Topless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2007, 03:40 PM   #14
Registered User
 
edevlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 916
Just my two cents, I tried to control as many variables as possiblw when I did before and after dyno runs with the addition of German-made TTP headers to my 2000 2.7L Boxster.

Depending on the run, I only saw a 3-5 hp increase at the wheels, less than I expected, but the headers sure make the exhaust system sing, at least to my ears. The downside is that I have been messing around with check engine light after the headers went on.

Ed

__________________
My Car Webpage

2000 2.7L Boxster 102K; TTP intake, headers, high-flow cats; Dansk high-flow muffler; Autothority ECU chip; TechnoTorque 2; Bilstein coilovers; Racing Dynamics strut brace; stress-bar suspension kit; Aasco lightweight flywheel, B&M short shiftkit; 18" wheels; spare tire delete; OEM GT3 seats; JL audio speakers and subwoofer; Alpine PDX-5/PDX-2 amps; Kenwood DNX8120 CD/DVD/Nav; litronics, deambered
edevlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2007, 09:54 AM   #15
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat
Dyno graphs are great tools.
What I care about, however, is how the car drives. How much of a difference would you say this made in your car's seat-of-the-pants performance/feel?
Yes, I know this is subjective, but if you could expand on how the car feels before and after I would appreciate it.
Well, seat of the pants feels MORE SMOOTH is the best way to describe it. The engine feels more free-reving (especially from around 4000rpm) but not by much.

You can definitely feel the difference though as I have already driven the car in stock from for a few years so it's easier for me to pick up any improvements. I wouldn't expect much more than that though it's not a magical mod like increase boost in a turbo car which would totally alter the behavior of the car.

In this case the car is smoother with a little bit quicker acceleration which is a nice cost effective enhancement consider the relative low cost and ease of installation compared to say, an evo cold air intake or an aftermarket muffler.

For those who like to talk numbers. $475/25whp= $19 per hp at the wheels!
Now you all know how much a performance software costs which typically "claims" 15-20hp at the engine.

However the point I'm trying to emphasize here is not how much more power it delivers but how it makes the engine breath just that little bit better everywhere in the rev range and how the car drives a little smoother.


Last edited by panameras; 09-07-2007 at 09:57 AM.
panameras is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page