10-08-2006, 02:52 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: upstate, Ny
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ohioboxster
The part where you say the Porsche will be cheaper to own and maintain may not be accurate. This is an expensive car to maintain even for the DIY guy. I love my car until it has to be fixed or the oil needs changed. Good luck, Im sure you will love the Boxster. Get a warranty if you get the Porsche. My .02
|
The cheaper to own statement was made based on residual value, the other cars, while costing the same will depreciate much faster then the porsche.
The oil change interval is around 10k miles, the others will be at 5k... the oil and filter do not cost twice as much as the other cars, so basic PM maintance will also be less.
I forgot to mention, of the two businesses I own, one is a high volume auto repair/tire shop, so working on the car is not an issue.
|
|
|
10-08-2006, 03:19 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Akron
Posts: 793
|
I dont know how much oil changes are on the other cars. I do however know that my car holds almost 10 qts at $5.79 a qt and the filter is around $18.00 its not cheap was my point. If you research this site you will find that most of our cars have the same maintenance issues. Examples are MAF , 02 sensors, ignition switches and you pray daily that the RMS issues will leave you alone. Its a good thing you own an auto repair shop because the Boxster will be in one of the bays quite often. Im not trying to talk you out of the Porsche by any means. I wish I would have researched more before I bought mine.
__________________
2002 TT
|
|
|
10-08-2006, 04:09 PM
|
#3
|
|
Guest
|
I got a 99 boxster specificaly because its the year pre 2.7 engine. That way there are things that I can get for my car that 2.7's have a harder time (and vice versa). So far I have had no problems other than a dirty MAF, but with an aftermarket warranty (paid an ass load) I only have to pay a $100 deductible for any work besides brakes and oil changes etc... So if I ever get an rms or engine failure I get a new engine and labor for $100. Get the boxster because even if you only keep it for a couple monthes you could probably sell it for more than you paid if you get a good deal.
|
|
|
|
10-08-2006, 04:26 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 7,243
|
If you have a repair shop, buy a boxster! I sure would if I had a repair shop. That would make owning my old, needs everything boxster a lot more fun. Just make sure the guy working on it is familiar with Boxsters and their typical issues.
I tell you what though, the maintenance goes well beyond the oil changes. Boxsters seem to eat tires faster than most other cars and need suspension parts replaced far earlier than other makes, etc. Even if you can get the labor comp'd through your company, you still have to pay for the parts. I just bought a control arm and at 10% over cost, it was 270.00.
|
|
|
10-08-2006, 04:29 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Akron
Posts: 793
|
That was the point I was trying to make. I didnt mean dont buy a Boxster because oil is expensive. They are just a repair shops dream car.
__________________
2002 TT
|
|
|
10-08-2006, 05:17 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
You might also want to rethink that depreciation assumption also.
__________________
Rich Belloff
|
|
|
10-08-2006, 07:31 PM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: upstate, Ny
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Brucelee
You might also want to rethink that depreciation assumption also.
|
I don't think there is any need for that.
Look at how hard the RL gets hit, it will lose 20k in value in 3 years, the boxster will lose a lot less, the big hit has already been taken buying one used... but based on the replies I really don't think I am interested in getting involved with vehicle that has a lot of known problems.
The G35/37 will probably be the car for me, japanese reliability, great engine, torque, new car waranty and won't cost much more to own for a few years then the boxster, by that point I should be in a position to purchase a new 997, which is what I really want. I just thought that boxster would be a fun interm vehicle and a possible nice introduction to owning a porsche.
Thanks for the honest feedback, it makes this choice a lot easier.
|
|
|
10-08-2006, 05:18 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 117
|
You only live once...I bought my first Porsche in my forties; wish I had a time machine to buy one my twenties...
__________________
Mantis - Atlanta area
2006 Boxster S
2005 Cayenne S
|
|
|
10-08-2006, 06:21 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,147
|
Go for the Porsche....you only live once. I am a young guy (early thirties) and the advice I give is: buy a house, max out your retirement, and have 3-6 months of paycheck in a SAVINGS ACCOUNT...if you can afford the Porsche after that...GO FOR IT. Be ready to beat the chicks off with a stick though...unfortunately the ones that hit on me are usually the hefty ones at the drive through. My wife justs laughs at me...and laughs and laughs.
__________________
'05 987 Basalt Black/Sand Beige
5 spd, 18" wheels
AH-64 Apache
RC-12 Guardrail
RC-7 Crazy Hawk
"If the wings are traveling faster than
the fuselage, it's probably a helicopter--
and therefore, unsafe" --Unknown
|
|
|
10-08-2006, 07:21 PM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: upstate, Ny
Posts: 4
|
You guys are starting to make me scared... I have a friend with a 00 986 he bought it used with 21k on the clock, it currently has 39k and he has done nothing other then oil changes and a battery. I have a number of boxsters that come in, along with 993's, 996's and a small handful of 997's and they all seem fairly trouble free.... or maybe the owners are hiding it from me.
I had a new caddy a number of years ago and owning that car was like joint custody with the dealership, which is why I went japanese and now I am spoiled with the reliability. If constant problems are part of owning the car then its not for me, I just like a car that is fun to drive and works. I know the S2000 seems like another possible choice, but to me it seems less practical then the boxster and I really want a car with more torque(my main complaint with the Acura).
I'll remain open minded about this, but honestly based on the replies so far I am not interested in getting a car if its going to be problems... in this day and age that seems like a very foolish thing to do, image is not that important to me.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:50 PM.
| |