![]() |
Oh yeah, this could be useful for modeling front splitters, 3rd party wings and spoilers, etc... Fred you are in for it now...
|
I would also love to see the top down results since I have with the top down on the track (most of us do).
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Top up is required, or if you have no top, arm restraints Roll cage is not required for a Boxster unless you have a lot of performance points |
PCA is top up but a lot of other groups let you drive top down, I did it once and didn't really like it, of course it was hot as $%&* that day.
|
Do you mind sharing the model? I would like to see if I could design a spliter to balance the rear spoiler.
|
Quote:
|
Topless as requested Jay! Just took me 4hrs just to sew and stitch those cabin surfaces LOL. You've done so much good e.g. leaving multiple kind msg on RL on my behalf, that I think I owe you more than a few visuals bud :cheers:
RE Air Flow on the Topless boxster; to me it appears that the spoiler becomes redundant as there is absolutely no friction for the air to drag onto above your head. I'm not a professional but it appears to me that you are going to go so much faster at the track with the top down LOL You'll certainly have cheaper gas bills that's for sure ;) Velocity only - same speed (180km). No lift & drag figures in fear to get sued by Porsche if I ever try to go that far! Not my car after all and the CAD model may differ from specs (i.e it would be pretty unfair to them). https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/382/31...c24f3ea8_b.jpg https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/313/31...2c940f50_b.jpg https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/314/31...bb942b96_b.jpg https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/485/31...849135e7_b.jpg |
Quote:
Preview - surely look better up close: http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1486475403.jpg |
This thread is fantastic, as usual I have to pass a huge thanks for nine8six for the contributions provided to this forum.
|
^ Wroom-wroom! You are welcome Sir :cheers:
|
Quote:
What he said. Thanks. Great stuff!! |
Hey thanks Fred.
I may be reading the flow wrong, but is the airflow smoother with the top down? |
Quote:
http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1486478373.jpg I still want a Procshe shirt, but this is not the one to do it on. http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1486478752.jpg |
^ Nice!! (less the PROCHE one, funny)
Quote:
My observations are that topless delete all friction and the air flow is more linear (better, less drag, eliminating extra lift potentially also). This seems to cancel the spoiler purpose and downforce however. Compared to the w/ roof where the air drops down on your clam shell, creating more drag due to friction BUT offer much better downforce. Roof/no roof; which is better in a stock setup I have no no bloody idea man. You guess is as good as mine. Sure the track guys will chime in having obviously better knowledge on this subject than me. TRK, hello? |
Quote:
|
w the roof the air is forced to follow the roofline which is a longer distance than the air travelling under the car (a curve vs a straight line). conservation of mass and all that says that the air traveling over the roof has to get to the back of the car the same time as the air under the car. since it is a longer distance over the top it has to travel faster (red vs green) to get to the back at the same time as the underneath air. the faster air is less dense, which creates a pressure differential btw top and bottom of the car - this is lift. the purpose of the rear spoiler is not downforce (otherwise it would be a wing) but rather to 'spoil' the airflow over the top to kill the lifting effect (the spoiler creates a pocket of turbulent air which causes the airflow to delaminate from the roof further forward than it would otherwise, forcing it to travel straight back instead of along the car - shortening the path).
w/o the roof then the curved path is gone and the spoiler not as necessary. replaced by a big pocket of turbulent air - less lift, but it takes work to make air turbulent, so increased air resistance. the soln is to keep the roof (less air resistance) but kill airflow under the car to reduce lifting effect - front lip, side skirts. add a rear diffuser which effectively extends the length of the underside of the car so that the travel distance is the same under as over and no lift effect. stop those frigging radiators from venting air down and under the car. all that kills lift. next step is to add downforce - wings, front canards, vent the radiators upwards. vent the wheel wells (wheel wells accumulate air with a high pressure point at the top of the wheel just forward of the wheel centre line - vent the wheel wells up and you convert lift to downforce). beware downforce - the faster you go the better it works - chicken out and slow down and you lose downforce which means you lose traction ... |
WARNING (teenagers!)
Quote:
|
Quote:
What is this? dual-purpose? (serious question) http://revivalsportscars.com/wp-cont...ler-detail.jpg |
i think so, yes. the tailbase spoils lift (and grabs air to cool the engine) while the wing sits up in the clean air to create downforce.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website