Location: Montreal, QC. (currently expat to Shanghai)
Posts: 3,249
Gator, thanks for the straight forward question.
In that case I'd be more interested in item C. Not exactly cheap but do recognize the power gain and would be willing to throw it in. In fact a lot of the 2.5 league would be interested in item C I'm sure.
But again, that doesn't mean that A and B are not equally interesting for me. You asked us to make a choice, so I did.
Hope it helps
__________________
______________________________
'97 Boxster base model 2.5L, Guards Red/Tan leather, with a new but old Alpine am/fm radio.
In that case I'd be more interested in item C. Not exactly cheap but do recognize the power gain and would be willing to throw it in. In fact a lot of the 2.5 league would be interested in item C I'm sure.
But again, that doesn't mean that A and B are not equally interesting for me. You asked us to make a choice, so I did.
Hope it helps
The 996 TB and plenum won't fit a 2.5, the intake design is different.
__________________
ASE certified Automotive Master Technician.
Porsche Tech in France.
www.benautodesign.fr
Ben-Auto-Design : Performance parts for 9X6 / 9X7
1982 928 S Euro
Location: Montreal, QC. (currently expat to Shanghai)
Posts: 3,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben006
The 996 TB and plenum won't fit a 2.5, the intake design is different.
I'm guessing the egas and mechanical design aren't compatible also :/ Ah well...
Total discrimination. So you performance parts designers does it for cars who already performs perfectly? Forgetting the car that needs it most??? Totally unfair lollll
__________________
______________________________
'97 Boxster base model 2.5L, Guards Red/Tan leather, with a new but old Alpine am/fm radio.
Boxster S
Genesis 3.8
Hybrid Mode
