04-27-2006, 09:57 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 1
|
Which year to buy?
Ladies and gentlemen,
I am proceeding to move from a 1976 914 to a Boxster. 914's had good years and bad years. What is the best year used Boxster to buy, what should I "steer away from", and possibly what issues/problems are common for each year. Any other information would greatly be appreciated!
|
|
|
04-27-2006, 10:33 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 446
|
You probably need to factor in your budget when you look at the years of production. I don't have alot of experience or knowledge on the earlier models, but the major update occured starting with the 2005 model (different appearance, more HP, new interior etc..). So I personally, have a preference for the '05-'06 models and I haven't heard of any major issues with either of those years.
|
|
|
04-27-2006, 10:58 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
|
check consumer reports they track customer complaints for each model year.
I know my 2000 was a good vintage.
Also Finland assembled Boxsters seem to have fewer issues then German builds.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
|
|
|
04-27-2006, 11:49 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
If you have the dough, I think the 2003 Boxster S is the best VALUE of the Boxster series.
Expect to pay mid 30s.
If you need to go lower, stay at 2000 or newer if you can.
Good luck!
__________________
Rich Belloff
|
|
|
04-27-2006, 12:25 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 7,243
|
97's and some 98's had some small and big problems. Good owners of these cars have had them taken care of though.
03 and up had glass windows in the back... very nice to have if you can afford one this new.
|
|
|
04-27-2006, 02:05 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: la
Posts: 24
|
Hmm.. why '03? Would a CPO '03 Boxster S be better than a '05 Boxster?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brucelee
If you have the dough, I think the 2003 Boxster S is the best VALUE of the Boxster series.
Expect to pay mid 30s.
If you need to go lower, stay at 2000 or newer if you can.
Good luck!
|
|
|
|
04-27-2006, 02:44 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbadss
Hmm.. why '03? Would a CPO '03 Boxster S be better than a '05 Boxster?
|
I think the 03 pricing to value is good. If one thinks of an 05 and its price, why not a new one?
As to better, that is totally subjective. I really don't care for the cosmetic changes made to the Box in 05 but that is just me.
__________________
Rich Belloff
|
|
|
05-01-2006, 03:31 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 37
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaportrail
Ladies and gentlemen,
I am proceeding to move from a 1976 914 to a Boxster. 914's had good years and bad years. What is the best year used Boxster to buy, what should I "steer away from", and possibly what issues/problems are common for each year. Any other information would greatly be appreciated!
|
Vaportrail,
Two suggestions for you, having recently bought an MY02 Boxster S - hope they help you in your search, as I think I would probably have preferred an earlier or later car for different reasons...
My favourite thing about the MY01 (and before) is the layout of the dash, with the tacho having pride of place and the digital speedo appearing directly below the tacho in the same dial. For the track, or on any piece of road where you need to spend as much time looking at the road as possible, having both key instruments in the middle of the dash where they can be seen at a glance is most useful. For MY02 and later the trip computer display was placed in the middle of the tacho (even on cars where the trip computer was not optioned and you only see the odometer/trip meter), and the digital speedo made smaller and moved to the left to sit under the analog speedo. To me this was a step backwards in the layout of the instruments, and given the minimal other differences between MY01 and MY02 I would prefer the MY01 layout unless the MY02 actually has the trip computer as an option (which mine does not). I’m not sure when Porsche realised their mistake but the 987/997 cars have the speedo in the middle again.
On the other hand, if you plan on driving with the roof down fairly regularly (I only ever have the roof up if it’s raining or my wife has just been to the hairdresser…) the glass rear screen in the MY03 and beyond is a godsend. With the plastic screen in the earlier models (as per my MY02) I find myself needing to get out of the car at least every 2nd time the roof is opened to ensure that the screen folds correctly and I don’t risk cracking the plastic, which gets kinda annoying. I also managed to scratch the rear screen with the (plastic) buttons on my shirt sleeves, so I don’t think it’s the most durable of parts. The glass screen in MY03+ is a much better design and doesn’t have either of these issues, and I certainly underestimated the value of the glass roof when buying the earlier car..
The only other advice I can offer is that, in my opinion, an earlier ‘S’ is a better purchase than a later non-S. I ended up comparing a straight 987 (MY05) and an MY02 S, both available for roughly the same money, and I found the S to be a much better drive all round. Had the 987 been better optioned (esp sat-nav or heated seats, the latter of which are invaluable when driving on colder mornings with the top down) I might have been persuaded otherwise, but as it was I ended up buying the MY02 S.
Best of luck with the purchase.
James@fish
|
|
|
05-02-2006, 04:48 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 416
|
I don't anyone has said it yet so I will, buy the newest Porsche you can afford.
|
|
|
05-02-2006, 05:45 PM
|
#10
|
Guest
|
I'm no expert, just an owner/enthusiast.
I have a 98 non-S, with a 5-speed. I have been very pleased with it in the two years I've owned it. I haven't had any problems with it, and it turns heads every where I go. Lots of compliments, too.
The only thing I would say is...don't buy tiptronic. C'mon, this is a PORSCHE. An automatic in a sports car is....an oxymoron.
|
|
|
05-04-2006, 08:23 AM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ohio
Posts: 149
|
I've owned a 1973 914....I think the best year for a 914 was 1977 (the year they stopped production)
Gosh going to a 986/987 will be like going from horseback to jet travel!
Good luck!!!!
|
|
|
05-04-2006, 10:41 AM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: soCal
Posts: 388
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by creseida
I'm no expert, just an owner/enthusiast.
I have a 98 non-S, with a 5-speed. I have been very pleased with it in the two years I've owned it. I haven't had any problems with it, and it turns heads every where I go. Lots of compliments, too.
The only thing I would say is...don't buy tiptronic. C'mon, this is a PORSCHE. An automatic in a sports car is....an oxymoron. 
|
 - couldn't have said it better!
__________________
Mach Schnell
05 Mini Cooper S
CR/W - AC Schnitzerz'd, Alta CAI, Cravenspeed SSK
Japanese Rising Sun roof graphic
De-ambered and nearly de-chromed!
Sold - 05 BMW 330CI ZHP M-tuned
Imola Red, 6spd, Alcantra & Carbon Fiber Interior
Sold - 05 Boxster Black/Black 5spd
19" Carrera S Wheels
Bose Audio System/Sport Chrono Pkg
Schnell Short Shifter
Yellow Calipers c/ carbon fiber Porsche lettering
De-Ambered
Sold - 03 VW Beetle Silver - way too modified!
|
|
|
05-04-2006, 04:36 PM
|
#13
|
Guest
|
clutch snob? Hardly. I simply think that shifting your car (without the computer overriding you) is part of the driving experience. A clutch isn't hard to learn.
|
|
|
05-04-2006, 08:52 AM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 335
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesatfish
My favourite thing about the MY01 (and before) is the layout of the dash, with the tacho having pride of place and the digital speedo appearing directly below the tacho in the same dial. For the track, or on any piece of road where you need to spend as much time looking at the road as possible, having both key instruments in the middle of the dash where they can be seen at a glance is most useful. For MY02 and later the trip computer display was placed in the middle of the tacho (even on cars where the trip computer was not optioned and you only see the odometer/trip meter), and the digital speedo made smaller and moved to the left to sit under the analog speedo. To me this was a step backwards in the layout of the instruments, and given the minimal other differences between MY01 and MY02 I would prefer the MY01 layout unless the MY02 actually has the trip computer as an option (which mine does not). I’m not sure when Porsche realised their mistake but the 987/997 cars have the speedo in the middle again.
|
My '01 has the later dash layout. I could be mistaken but I think that change happend with the introduction of the 2.7
|
|
|
05-04-2006, 10:18 AM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North New Jersey
Posts: 440
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BuffaloBoxster
My '01 has the later dash layout. I could be mistaken but I think that change happend with the introduction of the 2.7
|
My 01 S has the later dash as well, my build date is somthing like Sept 2001
|
|
|
05-04-2006, 10:37 AM
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 28
|
1997 looks as good as a 2004
Except I only paid 12,900.
All records, dealer serviced. Has 100k but still drives and looks great.
Depends how much you want to spend.
Updated the tail lights and side markers. Headlights are next.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:47 PM.
| |