04-11-2014, 06:12 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Greenville, S.C.
Posts: 2,670
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfos
Uh... Manhattan isn't Long Island either... Out of curiosity, maybe you can answer this -- I heard about a study that said that the less that Americans knew about the location of the Ukraine, the more they want the US to intervene (attack). Why do people like (you?) that feel that way?
 |
Im totally on Russia's side actually, i mean the people want to be Russian so why should we intervene. Some would argue it is appeasement like with Hitler and Poland, but i do not imagine Russia going any further than Crimera.
|
|
|
|
04-11-2014, 08:35 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 1,796
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIGJake111
Im totally on Russia's side actually, i mean the people want to be Russian so why should we intervene. Some would argue it is appeasement like with Hitler and Poland, but i do not imagine Russia going any further than Crimera.
|
That's funny.
__________________
03 Carrera
02 Boxster S Guards Red, black interior with matching hardtop
89 Carrera 4
89 944 S2
78 911SC
|
|
|
|
|
04-12-2014, 01:43 PM
|
#3
|
|
Beginner
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,659
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIGJake111
Im totally on Russia's side actually, i mean the people want to be Russian so why should we intervene. Some would argue it is appeasement like with Hitler and Poland, but i do not imagine Russia going any further than Crimera.
|
Jake, You need to study a little history, what you are fishing for here is "anschluss" with Austria. BTW Putin used the same racial arguments Hitler did. Nothing like going with a tried and true plan. Appeasement ended with Poland, and then tens of millions of folks died in WW2. Mostly without nukes. We can beat that today in a couple of hours. Putin certainly would go further than Crimea given the chance. He wants the buffer states back that Russia lost around the time you were born.
__________________
2003 S manual
Last edited by Jamesp; 04-12-2014 at 01:53 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
04-12-2014, 01:58 PM
|
#4
|
|
Beginner
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,659
|
Whoops - +1 on the thoughts below that you can expect increased maintenance on a high mileage car, but going in eyes wide open, and doing the maintenance a high mileage car should be fine. Also the for the boogeyman IMSB, just plan to get it changed.
__________________
2003 S manual
|
|
|
|
|
04-12-2014, 05:04 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 202
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamesp
Whoops - +1 on the thoughts below that you can expect increased maintenance on a high mileage car, but going in eyes wide open, and doing the maintenance a high mileage car should be fine. Also the for the boogeyman IMSB, just plan to get it changed.
|
At this price, the car would go in for clutch and IMS before I had gone 50 Kilometers. And I would still have money left for an emergency fund.
|
|
|
|
|
04-12-2014, 05:12 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Greenville, S.C.
Posts: 2,670
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pony13ca
At this price, the car would go in for clutch and IMS before I had gone 50 Kilometers. And I would still have money left for an emergency fund.
|
For the price i say PPI and then jump on it!
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:20 PM.
| |
Molly
Yellowbird
Hybrid Mode
