Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-17-2014, 07:54 PM   #1
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
With the Gt3 engine they kept it a dry sump while all other engines, including the Turbo still have the standard oil pump and an "integrated dry sump" (aka wet sump).

The failures start with a low oil pressure dash warning, then the driver hears a noise, gets out of the car, finds oil leaking and then a fire ensues. Thats the description that was included in several articles about this issue.

My hypothesis is the engine gains an oil leak and the pressure loss is because the oil thats being lost is under pressure. When the engine shuts down some residual pressure is still there, which sprays onto the exhaust and then you have a fire. This can also be happening when the car is pulled over because air is all around the under side of the engine while the car is moving, which blows the oil away from the exhaust a bit; but when the car stops, air becomes stagnate the fire erupts.

Again, thats only my hypothesis from looking at the under side of the engine and where things are laid out, some of which makes no sense, like the heat exchanger thats UNDER the engine and mounted low ? Road hazard from hell!

Needless to say, I am working super hard to understand this and design my own fix for it. I had a customer who had a new GT3 on order when this happened. He was going to ship me the car as soon as he received it, for me to take it as large as I dared (4.4L). I only wish I had the car here and had killed its warranty on purpose, then I'd have to understand the issue and design my own fix for it, because we would have killed its warranty, on purpose :-)
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2014, 09:00 PM   #2
Registered User
 
BIGJake111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Greenville, S.C.
Posts: 2,670
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby View Post
Needless to say, I am working super hard to understand this and design my own fix for it. I had a customer who had a new GT3 on order when this happened. He was going to ship me the car as soon as he received it, for me to take it as large as I dared (4.4L). I only wish I had the car here and had killed its warranty on purpose, then I'd have to understand the issue and design my own fix for it, because we would have killed its warranty, on purpose :-)
4.4L, That sounds mean... but your assumed diagnosis makes sense to me.
BIGJake111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2014, 04:20 AM   #3
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
The "oil cooler" is now under the engine with the GT3. It's not in the engine bay like other 9a1 or M96 based engines.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2014, 05:12 AM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southern New jersey
Posts: 1,054
I think the increase in recall's and faulty engineering in modern Auto's is the result of going straight from computer modeling to production, with no testing or proof of concept, optimized for lows costs and ease of assembly. Probably young engineers managed by bean-counters, with no practical experience.
stephen wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2014, 07:49 AM   #5
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephen wilson View Post
I think the increase in recall's and faulty engineering in modern Auto's is the result of going straight from computer modeling to production, with no testing or proof of concept, optimized for lows costs and ease of assembly. Probably young engineers managed by bean-counters, with no practical experience.
I concur completely!!!!
I'd love to know how long it takes them to get something from concept to showroom floor these days.

They've learned it's cheaper to deal with issues that may pop up later, rather than ensuring there are no issues during development. This seems to be the case for all the manufacturers.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page