Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-19-2013, 08:36 AM   #1
Registered User
 
ppbon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 529
I am! ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Perfectlap View Post
^ I thought Pedro was a cartoon!
here's the proof!



Happy Boxstering,
Pedro
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is: Racecar!
ppbon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 09:38 AM   #2
soucorp
 
soucorp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 181
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by ppbon View Post
here's the proof!

Happy Boxstering,
Pedro
LoL, good work Pedro, nice to meet you !

C H E E R S

-Mike



Last edited by soucorp; 09-19-2013 at 09:40 AM.
soucorp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 10:24 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Perfectlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
Quote:
Originally Posted by ppbon View Post
here's the proof!



Happy Boxstering,
Pedro

Hmm... Looks photoshopped to shave a few years off.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
Perfectlap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2013, 04:49 PM   #4
Registered User
 
heliguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,111
Southernstar, are suggesting that almost 4,000 boxsters had IMS failures reported to Porsche? That figure seems pretty far-fetched.
heliguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 03:43 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 598
The percentages are based upon Porsche's own figures obtained by the plaintiff's during the discovery process in the class-action suit. I assume it was based upon figures from the United States only (although I suspect the failure rate would be similar internationally).

Brad
southernstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 04:35 AM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Nh
Posts: 21
Interesting explanation of IMS issue by Pedro. Would Jake Raby or anyone from LN comment on this theory and potential fix?

Last edited by Rlwalker799; 09-19-2013 at 04:36 AM. Reason: Spelling
Rlwalker799 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 03:32 PM   #7
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rlwalker799 View Post
Interesting explanation of IMS issue by Pedro. Would Jake Raby or anyone from LN comment on this theory and potential fix?
No. Doing so would only lead to drama, which is what occurs here on the forums.

My book covers this extensively, will be released at the 2014 Porsche Parade.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 04:54 PM   #8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Fargo
Posts: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby View Post
No. Doing so would only lead to drama, which is what occurs here on the forums.

My book covers this extensively, will be released at the 2014 Porsche Parade.
Why make us wait to buy a book from you in 2014 as we are all needing help and advice for this problem right now. Surely you are well aware 2014 may be too late for us. Why don't you fill us in in as this is a forum thats here for help when needed
polkfarmboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 03:59 AM   #9
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 130
Thought this was a good one to share. Seems like the world is coming to an end when Porsche engine quality is being overshadowed by Ford

Ford makes the best engine in the world? Germans get shocked in viral video - NY Daily News
dennis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 03:10 PM   #10
Registered User
 
Trey T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 244
It's a free country, man. If he chooses to not to share, we shouldn't ridicule him. However, if there is a negative effect for his action or lack of his action, his reputation is at stake.
Quote:
Originally Posted by polkfarmboy View Post
Why make us wait to buy a book from you in 2014 as we are all needing help and advice for this problem right now. Surely you are well aware 2014 may be too late for us. Why don't you fill us in in as this is a forum thats here for help when needed
Trey T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 04:39 PM   #11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Fargo
Posts: 71
I am going to get the $800 kit from that guy in the video right now
polkfarmboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2013, 08:59 AM   #12
Registered User
 
Perfectlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
I'm just tossing this question out there for anyone, but is the IMS the only part in the m96 that is prone to oil starvation?
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
Perfectlap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2013, 02:23 PM   #13
Registered User
 
Trey T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 244
From what I've read and analyzed in the last several years, nobody understand why there's a problem with the IMS bearing. I mean, no body!

There are many speculations but nobody can prove why it happened!!!! I have not seen any scientific test done to it, not even close!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perfectlap View Post
I'm just tossing this question out there for anyone, but is the IMS the only part in the m96 that is prone to oil starvation?
Trey T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2013, 09:06 AM   #14
Registered User
 
evo-r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 378
Would it be my best interest to "Exclude Myself" instead of "Object" to the Class Action Settlement when my 2003 with 80k miles has been "placed in service" (registered) for more than 10 years?
__________________
His: 2003 Boxster & 2008 MDX
Hers: 2011 Golf TDI
evo-r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2013, 10:01 AM   #15
Registered User
 
thom4782's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Foster City CA
Posts: 1,099
Quote:
Originally Posted by evo-r View Post
Would it be my best interest to "Exclude Myself" instead of "Object" to the Class Action Settlement when my 2003 with 80k miles has been "placed in service" (registered) for more than 10 years?
If enough people object, the terms of the settlement may get changed for the better for people like yourself. If you exclude yourself, you'd have to sue Porsche on your own to get any benefit and the cost of doing that will be greater than buying a new motor. Personally, I objected because my car like yours is outside the 10 year window.
thom4782 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2013, 08:11 PM   #16
Registered User
 
evo-r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 378
Quote:
Originally Posted by thom4782 View Post
If enough people object, the terms of the settlement may get changed for the better for people like yourself. If you exclude yourself, you'd have to sue Porsche on your own to get any benefit and the cost of doing that will be greater than buying a new motor. Personally, I objected because my car like yours is outside the 10 year window.
To object is a gamble too as there is no way of knowing the outcome and it may end up that you lose your right to sue Porsche later on. I still need to think it through as to what I'm gonna do but do you mind sharing what did you state in your objection letter? Thanks!
__________________
His: 2003 Boxster & 2008 MDX
Hers: 2011 Golf TDI
evo-r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2013, 08:20 PM   #17
Registered User
 
thom4782's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Foster City CA
Posts: 1,099
Sent you a PM
thom4782 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2013, 09:03 PM   #18
Registered User
 
nieuwhzn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 296
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by evo-r View Post
To object is a gamble too as there is no way of knowing the outcome and it may end up that you lose your right to sue Porsche later on. I still need to think it through as to what I'm gonna do but do you mind sharing what did you state in your objection letter? Thanks!
No, not true. If you object you will still stay in the Class. Actually you can only object if you stay in the Class, if you exclude yourself you cannot object anymore. Read the notice carefully.
nieuwhzn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2013, 09:14 PM   #19
Registered User
 
nieuwhzn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 296
Garage
I think someone mentioned objecting through Email instead of writing and posting a letter. Since I'm a lazy bum I'd like to know how I'm supposed to do that.

My objection is against the 10 years max age of the car and against the pathetic 25% reimbursement when the car is bought used.
nieuwhzn is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page