02-10-2013, 07:31 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 713
|
Very Interesting! Do you know how long this has been available? Thanks for posting this.
|
|
|
02-10-2013, 07:35 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 7
|
Wow, I'd love to hear Jake Raby's feedback on this.
"We here at TuneRS Motorsports have designed and developed the perfect, final solution for the dreaded Intermediate Shaft Bearing failure" is a very bold statement.
|
|
|
02-10-2013, 09:42 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Freeport, New York
Posts: 471
|
This "solution" appears to address what everyone has stated, for years, was the main cause of IMS bearing failure, namely lack of lubrication once the factory seals became compromised and, it does not add another unknown to the equation.
I am curious to know more about the real world testing of this approach, including the 48 hours at Sebring with the 1999 Spec Boxster mentioned on their website.
Regards, Maurice.
|
|
|
02-10-2013, 10:11 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 14
|
This solution gives me a lot of confidence. Instead of just trying to beef up every component of the system at the car owner's expense, this solution jumps straight to addressing the actual problem. And it does it in a way that is simpler, cheaper, works on more cars, and doesn't require special tools or expertise.
As an engineer with over 25 years of experience, I've found that shoot-in-the-dark solutions show a lack of understanding and are the most unnecessarily complicated (and hence most unreliable). As the great Donald Knuth once said, "premature optimization is the root of all evil." This solution is just the opposite.
Bravo to TuneRS. I look forward to hearing more details.
|
|
|
02-10-2013, 11:26 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 713
|
Stefan I agree. This looks very simple and effective. This looks like the fix that a guy named felix detailed on Pelican. Very good thread. I like options!!
|
|
|
02-10-2013, 11:31 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Foster City CA
Posts: 1,099
|
I looked at this on the vendor's website. In fact, I even watched the video. What do others think? Will the oil reach the inner part of the ISMB so it can actually lubricate the bearings.
|
|
|
02-10-2013, 03:29 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 735
|
Interesting approach to the IMS bearing issue. Just wondering where does the oil go after it enters the outer flange area. Is it forced through the bearing's inner seal into the IMS tube? Removing the inner seal is not an option, since removing the bearing with a puller will ruin the bearing.
__________________
2000S Ocean Blue Metallic- 116K
3X Water Pump, Clear side markers, Crios Mod, Front engine mount, Flywheel, clutch, RMS, AOS, MAF, serpentine belt, power brake vacuum line, battery, 2X CV boots, Fuel filter, Oil filler tube, 3X ignition switch, 90K service, gas cap, Coolant tank
Last edited by Spinnaker; 02-10-2013 at 03:34 PM.
|
|
|
02-10-2013, 03:54 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 7
|
How close is this to LN engineering's ims solution?
|
|
|
02-10-2013, 05:10 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 1,396
|
there have been a few groups/people working on an oil based solution to this. i followed feelyx on pelican ( Who has done an IMS change (New Oil Fed Design Idea) - Pelican Parts Technical BBS )
who knows who started when, but i heard of feelyx's before jake's (though i'm sure jake was keeping his under wraps, so i don't mean to imply anything).
it's interesting to see, that's for sure.
__________________
"Speed has never killed anyone, suddenly becoming stationary... that's what gets you."
|
|
|
02-10-2013, 05:43 PM
|
#11
|
Engine Surgeon
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
|
This retains a ball bearing. It does not share the art that makes the IMS Solution unique. Though oil is delivered to the IMS bearing area, it is not fed to a plain bearing like it is in the IMS Solution.
Oil is also robbed from a different point from the engine and there is a reason why we decided not to use that location to feed the IMS Solution.
I developed the IMS Solution because I did not want a ball bearing to reside within my engines. The ball bearing is the problem and the source of all evil. Anything else is just a band aid.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Last edited by Jake Raby; 02-11-2013 at 05:54 AM.
|
|
|
02-11-2013, 05:41 AM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Jackson Hole, Wyoming
Posts: 800
|
Maybe it would be a good idea to use for the 3rd generation, larger, non-removeable IMSB for which Jake has not developed an IMS Solution.
|
|
|
02-11-2013, 05:54 AM
|
#13
|
Engine Surgeon
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe B
Maybe it would be a good idea to use for the 3rd generation, larger, non-removeable IMSB for which Jake has not developed an IMS Solution.
|
Actually we have developed a solution for that application. The installation of the unit offers a lot of installation compromises and because of that we have chosen to continue working on it before releasing it. I don't believe in compromise.
The majority of the issues that are found occur with the 01-05 engines, which is why we have made that IMS Solution the priority when bringing units to the market.
Having options on the market are good things for everyone from consumer right up to the guys at the top of the food chain. Without things like this, what I do would be very boring.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
|
|
|
02-20-2013, 04:12 AM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 312
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby
Actually we have developed a solution for that application. The installation of the unit offers a lot of installation compromises and because of that we have chosen to continue working on it before releasing it. I don't believe in compromise.
.
|
That is good news. I have been thinking of picking up a 987, but have resisted due to the IMS issues. A solution to the larger IMS bearing problems would eliminate that hesitation.
Do you expect this project to be complete by 12/31/13?
__________________
2004 550 SE #1081 of 1953 (sold)
1997 911 Targa (sold)
|
|
|
02-11-2013, 06:09 AM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Freeport, New York
Posts: 471
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby
This retains a ball bearing. It does not share the art that makes the IMS Solution unique. Though oil is delivered to the IMS bearing area, it is not fed to a plain bearing like it is in the IMS Solution.
Oil is also robbed from a different point from the engine and there is a reason why we decided not to use that location to feed the IMS Solution.
I developed the IMS Solution because I did not want a ball bearing to reside within my engines. The ball bearing is the problem and the source of all evil. Anything else is just a band aid.
|
The band aid comment cannot be too comforting to all of those who have had LN Engineering bearings installed either at Jake's shop, independent shops or DIY.
Having purchased an (double row) LN Engineering ceramic bearing myself, I sincerely hope that it's not just a band aid.
Apparently, the TuneRS direct oil injection solution can also be applied to LN Engineering bearings, so that may be the way to go. My reasoning is that since there have fewer failures than you can count on one hand with the LN Engineering bearing prior to direct oil injection, this approach might just make it bullet proof, without introducing any other unknowns or unnecessary complications.
Again, I remember everyone stressing that the lack of lubrication due to the failure of the factory seals was the main cause that had to be addressed.
Regards, Maurice.
|
|
|
05-13-2013, 03:29 PM
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ontario,Canada
Posts: 84
|
Great read!! I have an 06 Boxster S with 60k and want to keep it for a very long time so adapting an IMS fix is definately on my bucket list.Jake Raby,your the man,and thx for all your work ,support and incredible design work because waiting for Porsche to help is obviously not in the cards.When do you think the IMS SOLUTION will be available for the 06 thru 08 late design IMSB.I have not needed any clutch work as off yet but was considering a comment you made on another site regarding just pulling the outer bearing seal which would at the very least lube the bearing if the seal failed.Could you comment on why the feed line location that Tuner Motorsports uses was less than ideal for the IMS SOLUTION.Thx
Warren H
Ontario,Canada
|
|
|
02-12-2013, 01:03 AM
|
#17
|
07 Carrera S Cab
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,273
|
Problem is, that still won't be bullet proof, as Jake indicates that there's like 20 other modes of failure for the M96 engine. It's all too dizzying for me. I gotta change all these internal parts to beefed up parts and/or add these nifty tricks so that my engine doesn't kaboom? Come on. For my 01 986 (now at 70k miles), I just have been doing the recommended maintenance items & changing the oil at its recommended intervals. Have added no band aids. Amazingly, the car is still running. At 12 yrs old now, even if the engine croaks (and it probably will cause there's a lot of modes of failure), I already got my grins, and will just move away from an M96. Now back to enjoying my Boxster, as I know its time is limited.
__________________
Current: 07 Carrera S Cab in Midnight Blue
Previous: 01 Boxster in Arctic Silver, 86 944 in Guards Red
Last edited by Boxtaboy; 02-12-2013 at 02:10 AM.
|
|
|
02-16-2013, 12:48 PM
|
#18
|
Mobile Porsche Surgeon
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Plano Texas
Posts: 239
|
I have stopped stressing about my IMS, my car has 130k on it and I have AAA, I had my motor blow in my BMW 2002 tii with 200k on it. I had it replaced with a baby 6 and it was way more fun to drive. If my boxster blows tonight I will ship it to Jake for a much bigger engine.
__________________
Mike's Specialty Porsche Service
Mobile Mechanic Specializing in Porsche and Select Automobiles
http://www.mikesspecialtyautomotiveservice.com/index.html
Early 1996 / 97 Boxster, 130 k, De snorkeled, IMS, Top Speed Headers.
|
|
|
02-16-2013, 12:53 PM
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Carnation, WA
Posts: 136
|
I'd ship it to Renegade Hybrids for an LS1. Why put *another* poorly designed engine in there? Do you LIKE rewarding Porsche for their shoddy engineering?
|
|
|
02-17-2013, 05:36 AM
|
#20
|
Mobile Porsche Surgeon
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Plano Texas
Posts: 239
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by grubinski
I'd ship it to Renegade Hybrids for an LS1. 
|
That would be way fun too, but I do not know if they are doing boxsters yet.
__________________
Mike's Specialty Porsche Service
Mobile Mechanic Specializing in Porsche and Select Automobiles
http://www.mikesspecialtyautomotiveservice.com/index.html
Early 1996 / 97 Boxster, 130 k, De snorkeled, IMS, Top Speed Headers.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:37 PM.
| |