Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-28-2012, 08:53 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 247
Instant MPG Boost!

Now that I have your attention...

So as a background, I have done quite a few long trips in the Boxster. Hence why it has over 106K. Last summer I did a 6000 mi+ trek across country for my sisters wedding. As before with the cruise control on, roof up, strait flat road, two people and luggage I was never able to break an average of 30mpg. If I recall my best indicated was 29.8 or something like that.

Not usually I could care less about gas mileage, sometimes I see how low I can get it just for fun. But this was interesting. Recently I changed the clutch out and replaced the fluid in the transmission. This is the only change that I made since last summer. Same oil, tires, wheels, etc...

Last week I drove down to San Diego and back for the holidays. Again two people and luggage. On the way down I was driving like a total ass so I couldn't really call, however on the way back after a friendly reminder that it wasn't acceptable I found myself with the cruise set 70-75, top up and even with some varied driving and AC on I was still at 30.6 until I hit traffic.

After dropping my GF off in San Fran, I came back down the 101 cruise set at 70, AC off, just me, and was able to average 32.2! Not that this is earth shattering by any means but a larger difference than I would have expected for just changing the gear oil.

Now I do have to admit that I did not use the Porsche gear oil but a formula given to me by a highly regarded Porsche mechanic. So far into the 40's it still shifted just fine. I'm not here to start a war on fluids, I'm just stating that clean fresh fluid made a much bigger difference than I would have ever expected.



Oh and still not a drop of oil used between oil changes!

__________________
2005 987 - 112K miles PASM + 6-speed - Daily Driver
1988 944 - 240K miles- Race Car
1974 911 Targa - new project
2009 Triumph Street Triple R - 27K mi - Blazen Orange
1976 Ford F250 camper special - tow vehicle
944boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 08:56 AM   #2
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: DFW
Posts: 782
Garage
I take it you used a thinner viscosity fluid than the the original trans-axle fluid. Thinner fluid = less resistance, more efficient. Do tell.
Kenny Boxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 09:14 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 1,561
The answer is 5%.

During your summer trip, 93 or 91 octane in your area was about 9-10% ethanol.

When you did the trip last week, the same gas is now closer to 4-5% ethanol.

That's my guess from testing fuel this past winter/spring and summer.
Flavor 987S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 09:34 AM   #4
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: DFW
Posts: 782
Garage
That would make sense but I've heard anecdotal reports that winter blend gasoline is actually less potent then summer and also less fuel efficient. So, I imagine in the summer this guy's mpg maybe be an additional .2 increase. Still waiting for him to chime in.
Kenny Boxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 11:03 AM   #5
Certified Boxster Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,669
My first thoughts are that real world driving has too many variables that can cause the mpg's to vary, especially if you're trying to account for a few percent difference. You'd have to drive the same route at the same time of year in similar traffic with the cruise control set to the same speed in the same places to get an apples to apples comparison that would allow you to try to isolate the change in mpg due to the change in tranny fluid.

Whatever change that the trans fluid had on the mpg's is most likely masked by all of the real world variables that are probably much larger contributors to a difference in mpg.
__________________
1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
1979 911 SC
POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor

Last edited by thstone; 11-28-2012 at 11:19 AM.
thstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 11:05 AM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 247
So I cannot for sure say what the ethanol content of all the gasoline was for all those numbers. The trip this last week was all California 91 gas, presumably winter blend.

Back in WA I regularly filled up at a station that was 92 - ethanol free.

The cross country trip was gas from all over the place... could have been anything. 93 up to 10%

I agree that these numbers were pretty meaningless, wind factors could also throw it off that much. Next time I'll just put the top down and leave it in 3rd.

But since I drive the car quite often these were numbers that just 'felt' overall better than I had experienced before.

Now my bike still gets mid 20's lofting the front wheel down the back strait at Infineon...
__________________
2005 987 - 112K miles PASM + 6-speed - Daily Driver
1988 944 - 240K miles- Race Car
1974 911 Targa - new project
2009 Triumph Street Triple R - 27K mi - Blazen Orange
1976 Ford F250 camper special - tow vehicle

Last edited by 944boy; 11-28-2012 at 11:09 AM.
944boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 11:37 AM   #7
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: DFW
Posts: 782
Garage
Indeed. Many variables of gas blends, and also tail winds would probably do a lot more than tranny fluid. I believe it's a combination of tail wind and non-ethanol gas in some places, rather than the fluid.
Kenny Boxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 12:37 PM   #8
Registered User
 
ccstud17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 138
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny Boxster View Post
... also tail winds would probably do a lot more than tranny fluid. .
winner winner chicken dinner!

as all have stated too many variables, but as some one who has made countless road trips thru good ole Wyoming ( I live 30 miles away from Cheyenne) And wind is the #1 contributor to good or bad MPG. same car same gas stations on the same day same route, jsut one was made in the morning when it was calm 28 mpg, later in the day moderate wind 24mpg. no traffic anytime haha it is Wyoming after all...

wind has an exponential effect on mpg, punching a hole through 5mph wind is pretty easy at 35mph, but at 80mph a lot harder!

im just happy to hear someone properly taking care of their car with gear fluid changes
ccstud17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 02:17 PM   #9
Registered User
 
BYprodriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccstud17 View Post
winner winner chicken dinner!

as all have stated too many variables, but as some one who has made countless road trips thru good ole Wyoming ( I live 30 miles away from Cheyenne) And wind is the #1 contributor to good or bad MPG. same car same gas stations on the same day same route, jsut one was made in the morning when it was calm 28 mpg, later in the day moderate wind 24mpg. no traffic anytime haha it is Wyoming after all...

wind has an exponential effect on mpg, punching a hole through 5mph wind is pretty easy at 35mph, but at 80mph a lot harder!
im just happy to hear someone properly taking care of their car with gear fluid changes
The same is true for still air, as speed rises so does wind resistance. This is why cars are designed to be so aerodynamic
BYprodriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 02:32 PM   #10
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Miami florida
Posts: 1,591
If you set the cruise to 50 mph you would get great MPG, but who wants to drive at 55?
__________________
Current car

2000 Boxster 2.7l red/black

Previous cars

1973 Opel Manta
1969(?) Fiat 850 Convertible
1979 Lancia Beta Coupe
1981 Alfa Romeo GTV 6
1985 Alfa Romeo Graduate
1985 Porsche 944
1989 Porsche 944
1981 Triumph TR7
1989 (?) Alfa Romeo Milano
1993 Saab 9000
san rensho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 03:08 PM   #11
Registered User
 
Perfectlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
I have never been anywhere near 32 mpg.

Since installing Fabspeed, which has led to RPMs average of 4-5K, I doubt I go over 20mpg.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
Perfectlap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 03:28 PM   #12
Registered User
 
Raider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 51
Wasn't it after he dropped off the girl friend that the gas milage came way up? Just sayin'......
Raider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 04:17 PM   #13
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 247
Is that a valid reason for a breakup, Weight reduction? Probably not a good idea to tell someone who is athletic and only 110...
__________________
2005 987 - 112K miles PASM + 6-speed - Daily Driver
1988 944 - 240K miles- Race Car
1974 911 Targa - new project
2009 Triumph Street Triple R - 27K mi - Blazen Orange
1976 Ford F250 camper special - tow vehicle
944boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 05:12 PM   #14
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 383
Quote:
Originally Posted by 944boy View Post
Is that a valid reason for a breakup, Weight reduction? Probably not a good idea to tell someone who is athletic and only 110...
Your GF is 110 years old?
dbear61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 05:38 PM   #15
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Miami florida
Posts: 1,591
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbear61 View Post
Your GF is 110 years old?
Dude, she weighs 110 pounds and works out. I would trade 10 mpg for that.
__________________
Current car

2000 Boxster 2.7l red/black

Previous cars

1973 Opel Manta
1969(?) Fiat 850 Convertible
1979 Lancia Beta Coupe
1981 Alfa Romeo GTV 6
1985 Alfa Romeo Graduate
1985 Porsche 944
1989 Porsche 944
1981 Triumph TR7
1989 (?) Alfa Romeo Milano
1993 Saab 9000
san rensho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 06:16 PM   #16
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 247
Fair enough, I did not specify! Maybe both? (I was going to post a picture but had trouble finding something safe for anyone anywhere to view).

But yes, 110lbs. Not sure which one costs more in upkeep though...
__________________
2005 987 - 112K miles PASM + 6-speed - Daily Driver
1988 944 - 240K miles- Race Car
1974 911 Targa - new project
2009 Triumph Street Triple R - 27K mi - Blazen Orange
1976 Ford F250 camper special - tow vehicle
944boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 02:04 PM   #17
Registered User
 
Perfectlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
110 is good as long as she at least 5-7 and blonde.

__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
Perfectlap is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page