07-31-2012, 05:06 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 221
|
Used Oil Analysis at 57194 miles
For people who enjoy reading this kind of stuff. The oil was Red Line 5W-40 and it was the first time I've used it.
Also included my trending info if you really enjoy reading this stuff.
Regards,
paul...
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 05:46 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 1,561
|
Nice UOA. I used Red Line 5W40 for a few years with excellent results, like yours. Two years ago I switched to Mobil 5W50 (hard to find viscosity) and the UOA's improved slightly, so I am very happy with this choice too.
I am thinking about switching again to the new Joe Gibbs 5W40. from Jake and L&N Eng. Anyone try this yet?
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 05:51 AM
|
#3
|
Engine Surgeon
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
|
Here is a bit of a comparison.. Our lab uses a little different system since the data is actually used to develop base oils, detergency and anti-wear packages. This sample was taken at 8K miles as well.
I see some values in your previous UOA history that indicate the use of Mobil 1, looks like two of them for sure. What have been your impressions over the time that you have gathered this trend data?
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 05:55 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 1,561
|
^Jake, should I make the switch, or keep running the Mobil 5W50? Based on my UOA.
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 07:17 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 221
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby
......................
I see some values in your previous UOA history that indicate the use of Mobil 1, looks like two of them for sure. What have been your impressions over the time that you have gathered this trend data?
|
I've always felt that the Motul 8100 and M1 5W-40 TDT got the job done, but I switched to RL because those other oils gave me valvetrain noise on startup -- RL doesn't. I never bothered with M1 0W-40 because that's what's in my wife's 03 MB E320 and it always has valvetrain noise on startup.
BTW, if anyone wants the Excel spreadsheet of my history (to delete my stuff and add yours), PM me your email.
Regards,
paul...
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 12:45 PM
|
#6
|
Engine Surgeon
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
|
I also found the RL was always best for start up noise as well.. In that regard its even better than our current DT40 offering, but the DT40 modified thats in testing now should solve the issue. Its all a continuing evolution.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 04:09 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 1,561
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby
I also found the RL was always best for start up noise as well.. In that regard its even better than our current DT40 offering, but the DT40 modified thats in testing now should solve the issue. Its all a continuing evolution.
|
Jake, when will this tweak/revision be completed? I want to buy a case of oil from Charles, but I'd like the most updated product. I'm due for an oil change in late September, as I prepare the car for winter hibernation.
Will it be ready before then?
Thanks.
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 07:19 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,656
|
Redline makes excellent motor oil and ATF... too bad they're not as easy to locate where I am.
|
|
|
08-04-2012, 08:26 AM
|
#9
|
Engine Surgeon
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
|
It won't be through my testing for another 8 months or so.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:05 PM.
| |