Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-06-2011, 03:57 AM   #21
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 874
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakekit View Post
2012 Porsche Boxster snapped totally undisguised

I won't lie, I'm a bigger fan of the 986 styling than the 987, I like this even less.
Agreed, this really only cements the 986's position as the best looking Boxster.

That said, it's only the fussy rear lip that I really don't like on this new design. The rest is tolerable.

But my god it looks huge. In fact, that's one of the reasons why the 986 is the nicest Boxster. It looks relatively petite. Even the 987, which is in reality only a little bit bigger than the 986, looks like a big car.

__________________
Manual '00 3.2 S Arctic Silver
pothole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011, 04:02 AM   #22
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 61
pothole,

Spot on. It also feels like the rear half of the car is too big in some of these photos. I also like that on a 986 a nice set of 18s is a good match for the proportions and lines of the car. This desire to move to bigger and bigger wheels is just odd. Certainly those are the 20s from the 991S they have on that car. It's just silly.
__________________
2002 Boxster S Meridian\Boxster Red 6-spd
2006 Audi A3 2.0T Arctic White\Beige DSG
2010 BMW 535xiT Alpine White\Natural Brown
jakekit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011, 04:30 AM   #23
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 874
Yeah - I actually think the 986 looks best with a combination of 17s and a low ride height.

But the new 981 in those images is running on 20 inchers as you say, which gives you some idea of just how massive the car is.
__________________
Manual '00 3.2 S Arctic Silver
pothole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011, 05:37 AM   #24
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Missouri
Posts: 112
I find this to be a great leap backward. Both the 986 and 987 are light-years ahead of this. The front and rear are okay but the side strake and air scoop are just plain UGLY. I already don't like that kind of style but to have the scoop suddenly start at the back edge of the door just makes it look like something is missing; i.e., a transition. They've managed to make a sow's ear out of a silk purse.
johnsimion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011, 05:54 AM   #25
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by pothole View Post
Yeah - I actually think the 986 looks best with a combination of 17s and a low ride height.
I felt the same way til I found my car with 18" Sport Classic IIs. Now I am biassed.
__________________
2002 Boxster S Meridian\Boxster Red 6-spd
2006 Audi A3 2.0T Arctic White\Beige DSG
2010 BMW 535xiT Alpine White\Natural Brown
jakekit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011, 06:19 AM   #26
Ex Esso kid
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 1,605
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakekit View Post
I felt the same way til I found my car with 18" Sport Classic IIs. Now I am biassed.
Glad to hear it because my 986 is going to my father's caretaker (my cousin has helped me as I'm physically unable, she always loved the 986) I have no choice but to select something with PDK, still not loving the idea at all.
Ghostrider 310 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011, 06:43 AM   #27
Registered User
 
vitaminC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NorCal
Posts: 153
Garage
From these images, it seems the tail is way better than the rear on the 991. Overall, I think it looks pretty good, though it's tough to judge a redesign from a few spy shots... I'm looking forward to seeing this and the 991 in person.
__________________
'03 986S
vitaminC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011, 07:25 AM   #28
Certified Boxster Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,669
The huge side air intakes are what ruins the design for me. Those are big enough for a jet fighter!
__________________
1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
1979 911 SC
POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor
thstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011, 07:33 AM   #29
Registered User
 
Perfectlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostrider 310 View Post
I have no choice but to select something with PDK, still not loving the idea at all.

works for the guy with only one arm. He seems to be having a better time than most with two arms and a gear lever.
Salzburgring ´08 Porsche Cayman S vs. Boxster S - YouTube
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
Perfectlap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011, 09:06 AM   #30
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perfectlap View Post
works for the guy with only one arm. He seems to be having a better time than most with two arms and a gear lever.
Salzburgring ´08 Porsche Cayman S vs. Boxster S - YouTube
I don't want to chop one of my hands off to enjoy PDK/Tip if that's what you're trying to get at.
ekam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011, 10:53 AM   #31
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Novi Mi.
Posts: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by pothole View Post
Agreed, this really only cements the 986's position as the best looking Boxster.

That said, it's only the fussy rear lip that I really don't like on this new design. The rest is tolerable.

But my god it looks huge. In fact, that's one of the reasons why the 986 is the nicest Boxster. It looks relatively petite. Even the 987, which is in reality only a little bit bigger than the 986, looks like a big car.
+ 1 Pothole, My 99 Box has 18s and is lowered 1in. and looks Great. I do think that the current Boxster Spider is the best looking and performing Boxter made to date.

I hate the rear end on the 2012 but I will have to see it in person before I can say that I hate the new 2012.
jbs986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011, 10:55 AM   #32
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 61
jbs,
The Spyder is a spectacular car. I can't same I am a fan of the lines of the car with the speed humps though. It is definitely a matter of taste though.
__________________
2002 Boxster S Meridian\Boxster Red 6-spd
2006 Audi A3 2.0T Arctic White\Beige DSG
2010 BMW 535xiT Alpine White\Natural Brown
jakekit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011, 11:54 AM   #33
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Philly
Posts: 594
I like the new design except for the wing extending over the tail lights. I especially like the front. It looks more like a super car now and more aerodynamic.
__________________
00 2.7 5SPD MT
ProjectM96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2011, 01:53 PM   #34
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,656
Well I guess those photos are wrong.... because it looks nothing like what's in the video!!!

Porsche 991 Woke me up this morning in SF!!! - YouTube
ekam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2011, 06:30 PM   #35
Registered User
 
DenverSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Denver/Winter Park, CO USA
Posts: 600
It looks great. Especially the back end. I guess some change is good. The cool thing about any vehicle with over a decade of changes, like the Boxster, is that you can buy the year(s) you like and disregard the others.
__________________
Denver Steve
Carrera, Cabriolet, 6-Speed, Black/Tan
DenverSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 08:43 AM   #36
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mercer Island, WA
Posts: 99
My first two impresions were 1) MR2 and 2) the guy is tiny. I googled some pics of a 987 and an apparently normal person has shoulders that are about 4"-6" higher than the guy in the 2012 car. I know the trend is to put passengers lower in the car for safety, but - damn - they look really odd to me when the only thing you see is their heads poking above the doorline.

The CGT reference did get my brain to forget the MR2 - I think I'd now a fan of the side intakes (I'm OK with the ones on the 986 and disliked intensely the ones on the 987, so this is an improvement).

The rear view...I dunno, but I'm reminded of a newer Audi TT. Not really inspiring to me compared to the almost 550-like hindquarters of the 986. It's slightly less ungainly than a 997 'vert. As someone who used to own a Lexus SC430, I'm certainly willing to purchase a car with an ugly back end - if everthing else about the car is almost perfect.

But, damn, those wheels sure look "donk"!
__________________
2003 Porsche Boxster S - Speed Yellow (sold)
2005 Lexus LS430 ML
2006 Lexus GX470
CenterIsl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 10:11 AM   #37
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by CenterIsl View Post
My first two impresions were 1) MR2 and 2) the guy is tiny. I googled some pics of a 987 and an apparently normal person has shoulders that are about 4"-6" higher than the guy in the 2012 car. I know the trend is to put passengers lower in the car for safety, but - damn - they look really odd to me when the only thing you see is their heads poking above the doorline.
This is all for sake of safety. Higher door height will most likely result in lesser risk of injury from side impact... you cannot put your arm out the door like all old cars. You feel like you're sitting inside a tank with your head poking out. This is the one reason why I'm keeping my 986 for a long long time...
ekam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 11:18 AM   #38
Registered User
 
Idaho Red Rocket 3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Nampa, ID.
Posts: 488
Oh no, they copied the MR2, how cheap; was my first thought. Ok, enough about the funky body styling. We need details of the power supply, tranny and suspension options.
__________________
2000 Boxster S
And then there are the Motorcycles.
Idaho Red Rocket 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 04:16 PM   #39
Registered User
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: California
Posts: 1,859
Garage
A few of you were thinking MR2... The first thing I thought of is Carrera GT.

[url]http://www.sportscarcup.com/porsche-carrera-gt/silver-porsche-carrera-gt/[url]

Looks like most manufacturers are going smaller glass due to safety.
__________________
Jäger

300K Mile Club
Jager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 11:30 PM   #40
Opposed to Subie Burble
 
Overdrive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Central CT
Posts: 1,197
Garage
I find the spoiler making a sort of beltline with the small bars going across the taillights to be a strange touch, almost like trying to make the car seem very upscale (not necessary IMO, it's already a Porsche, and has only been improving in quality since the days of vinyl rear windows). It would just be bizarre if the spoiler were the entire thing from one light to another, so I'm glad they didn't do that, at least.

A friend of mine took a look at these photos and feels that this car might actually be smaller than my 986. I feel just the opposite, while I know he may be right, but the car just appears to be massive with the driver looking so small in the images. It seems like the car's gaining mass, which I hope is not the case. I will say, though, the first thing that popped out of his mouth was "looks like an MR2".

Everything from the nose up to the end of the doors definitely comes off very Carerra GT, which I don't think is a bad thing to go back to some successful (or at the very least, memorable) roots. The intakes look very out of place to me, just something about the shape of them. You can tell they want everything to look like it flows together, but for me that's one spot where it doesn't happen, and then there's the spoiler/beltline mentioned earlier at the rear. The rest of the car forward is very safe-looking typical Porsche styling. I'd be interested to see how the car looks top up.

As for the video I saw posted earlier, if that Boxster was any sort of camoflauged up, that could explain the difference in appearance, but either way, I'm not entirely thrilled about the styling direction....guess we'll have to wait for official pictures to see what's really on the table.

__________________
-O/D

1997 Arctic Silver Boxster, 5-spd
IMSR + RMS
Robbins glass window top
Overdrive is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page