02-22-2011, 11:24 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 42
|
Opinion 2003 s or 2005 base?
I am still trying to find the right car, and stumbled across a great deal on a 2005 Base. I am now not sure which is the way to go. I know I will love a 2003 s, but will i love a 2005 base? Car will be my DD, it will see occasional track time doing DE and autocross. There will be no upgrade money in my budget for at least a year.
|
|
|
02-22-2011, 11:29 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Carlos, CA 94070
Posts: 1,450
|
I vote for the 2003S
__________________
I still wave at Boxsters, but they no longer wave back :-(
2002 Boxster S "Violet" (sold but not forgotten)
2009 Carrera 4S "Kelsey" (current ride)
2015 FIAT 500e "Nikki" my commuter car
|
|
|
02-22-2011, 11:48 AM
|
#3
|
Certified Boxster Addict
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,669
|
I'd also vote for the '03 S (all other things being equal).
The add'l power is nice to have and the S models have several other nice to have's like sportier suspension and probably 18" wheels which will help in your DE's and autox until you have some money for upgrades.
__________________
1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
1979 911 SC
POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor
|
|
|
02-22-2011, 11:51 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
|
Regardless of what iteration you're looking at, I strongly recommend the "S" version .
By the way, most people aren't aware of what the "S" actually stands for . Its an abbreviation for "schlypfrig affe".
__________________
Don't worry … I've got the microfilm.
|
|
|
02-22-2011, 12:09 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 76
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Danger
Regardless of what iteration you're looking at, I strongly recommend the "S" version .
By the way, most people aren't aware of what the "S" actually stands for . Its an abbreviation for "schlypfrig affe".
|
Meanning.....
|
|
|
02-22-2011, 12:52 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: edmonton,alberta,canada
Posts: 104
|
Going to mean something like greasy monkey
but another website used the word ape and slippery
all things being equal
I'm thinking "Raped Ape" is the slang we would use here
Am I close?
Chris
__________________
Living one calculated risk @ a time
|
|
|
02-22-2011, 01:20 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris97boxster
Going to mean something like greasy monkey
but another website used the word ape and slippery
all things being equal
I'm thinking "Raped Ape" is the slang we would use here
Am I close?
Chris
|
According to my sources at Porsche Headquarters in Germany, the "S" stands for "saucy monkey" . Apparently, this type of encryption goes back to the early beginnings of the enigma machine .
__________________
Don't worry … I've got the microfilm.
|
|
|
02-27-2011, 06:08 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: California
Posts: 246
|
Too much interior Bling (chrome) on the '05.....I vote for the '03 S as well.
|
|
|
02-27-2011, 07:11 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: St Catherines, Ontario
Posts: 438
|
I drove a 987 s and base and I prefered the base 5spd gear box over the short ratio 6 speed. I also prefered the interior of the 987 over the 986. Suspension on the 986s is a different animal it really depends what you plan on using the car for. If you are like me and just cruise and want a street machine I'd be in a 987 base, if you plan on tracking then the 986s over any 987 s or base
__________________
2006 Audi A4 Avant 2.0t Quattro
1997 Boxster Glacier White w/facelift(gone but not forgotten)
2004 Boxster S 550 Spyder Anniversary Edition
|
|
|
02-22-2011, 11:58 AM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 144
|
Whichever has better condition and lower miles.
With 2003S, you can be sure that you can upgrade the IMS cheaply with LN IMS. With 2005 you don't know which bearing that car have (larger one with 3rd revision or smaller same with the 03S). Both car can be affected with IMS issue.
2005/987 has more modern interior design and more refined than 986 cars.
|
|
|
02-22-2011, 04:50 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by laphan
Whichever has better condition and lower miles.
With 2003S, you can be sure that you can upgrade the IMS cheaply with LN IMS. With 2005 you don't know which bearing that car have (larger one with 3rd revision or smaller same with the 03S). Both car can be affected with IMS issue.
2005/987 has more modern interior design and more refined than 986 cars.
|
I thought it was the 06 that had the newer engine.
|
|
|
02-22-2011, 05:06 PM
|
#12
|
Autobahn Glanz
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,282
|
Once I drove an 'S' I knew no matter what year I buy as my second boxster I will always be an 'S' guy, however these are my second cars, not daily if I don't want them to be.
I get the feeling you really like the 2005. I prefer the seat comfort in the 986 2000 to 2003, not as stiff. The interior is much more modern on the 05 but for some reason doesn't excite me, though the 986 is kind of outdated. I have a 2000 's'. What type of mileage are on these, how many more thousand $ is the 05?
Can't go wrong either way! Sure you'll be happy.
|
|
|
02-22-2011, 05:28 PM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipE350
Once I drove an 'S' I knew no matter what year I buy as my second boxster I will always be an 'S' guy, however these are my second cars, not daily if I don't want them to be.
I get the feeling you really like the 2005. I prefer the seat comfort in the 986 2000 to 2003, not as stiff. The interior is much more modern on the 05 but for some reason doesn't excite me, though the 986 is kind of outdated. I have a 2000 's'. What type of mileage are on these, how many more thousand $ is the 05?
Can't go wrong either way! Sure you'll be happy. 
|
Actually, i have always been a 986 guy over a 987 guy. I then started to find my car and started to look at the prices. You can find 2005 base models cheaper than a 2003 S. Mileage is between 35k-60k. I never thought I would look at a base model, but you can't help start to question it when you see the prices.
|
|
|
02-22-2011, 05:40 PM
|
#14
|
Autobahn Glanz
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,282
|
Tru. I do like the exterior on the 05 more...I have to force myself to not look at used 09 'S' ...I cleaned and waxed the 09 benz just so i wouldn't get any crazy ideas.
|
|
|
02-23-2011, 06:11 AM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 691
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by xamfed
Actually, i have always been a 986 guy over a 987 guy. I then started to find my car and started to look at the prices. You can find 2005 base models cheaper than a 2003 S. Mileage is between 35k-60k. I never thought I would look at a base model, but you can't help start to question it when you see the prices.
|
The '05 was the first year of the "new" 987 model Boxster. I would personally, never buy the first year of a new model -- especially an out-of-warranty Porsche.
As a daily driver, I would absolutely buy an '06 base model over an '03 S. I think in a couple of years you'll be so much better off. (I have an '02S).
__________________
SOLD - 2002 Boxster S - PSM, Litronics, De-ambered, Bird Bike Rack, Hardtop, RMS leak...
|
|
|
02-22-2011, 05:21 PM
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 144
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by xamfed
I thought it was the 06 that had the newer engine.
|
Here is the quote from LN website:
MY02-05 will need a single row retrofit kit, although depending on how late the build date was, there may be some MY05 vehicles with the updated M97 IMS, which is not serviceable, at least without teardown of the engine.
|
|
|
02-23-2011, 05:29 AM
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Missouri
Posts: 112
|
If you are tall and value your life, first sit in the 2003 "S" and tilt your head back and see if your head would hit the roll bar in an accident. I am 6'-3" and I fit nicely in my 1999 Boxster, but if I moved my head backwards, I discovered that my head would hit directly on the rollbar in case of an accident. This is fairly common with tall guys and I believe it is a major safety issue. As a result, I ended up trading the Boxster for a Cayman, which doesn't have the issue. Likewise, the 2005-up Boxsters have more headroom and taller seats and thus avoid this problem.
I would also check the HP statistics on the two cars -- for example, my base Cayman has more HP than some earlier Boxster "S" models. The 2005-up models also have an upgraded interior. If the HP and the prices are nearly the same, and since you aren't tracking it, I would definitely lean toward the 2005 model.
|
|
|
02-26-2011, 04:53 PM
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsimion
If you are tall and value your life, first sit in the 2003 "S" and tilt your head back and see if your head would hit the roll bar in an accident. I am 6'-3" and I fit nicely in my 1999 Boxster, but if I moved my head backwards, I discovered that my head would hit directly on the rollbar in case of an accident. This is fairly common with tall guys and I believe it is a major safety issue. As a result, I ended up trading the Boxster for a Cayman, which doesn't have the issue. Likewise, the 2005-up Boxsters have more headroom and taller seats and thus avoid this problem.
I would also check the HP statistics on the two cars -- for example, my base Cayman has more HP than some earlier Boxster "S" models. The 2005-up models also have an upgraded interior. If the HP and the prices are nearly the same, and since you aren't tracking it, I would definitely lean toward the 2005 model.
|
I went and drove both today. My head touched the roll bar on the 03, pretty scary if you think about it
|
|
|
02-26-2011, 04:57 PM
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 42
|
I went and drove a 2003 S. very nice car, didn't have power seats so I didn't fit well. I am 6'1" 180lbs.
I then drove a 2005 base. First time in a 987. What a nice car. Here are my opinions
2003 S is like going out for Filet's at Outback.
2005 base is like going for Filet's at Flemming's, It's more expensive but so much more enjoyable.
I imagine a 2005 S is like Filet's at Flemming's with a Supermodel
|
|
|
02-26-2011, 06:17 PM
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chadds Ford, PA
Posts: 177
|
I knew an S was for me but couldn't decide on 986 or 987. Decided on 987 and found an 05 S with 20K miles and settled on $26,500. Not sure of your budget but at 26,500 I couldnt turn it down. If you are patient and shop everyday you can find a similar deal.
__________________
02 Boxster S (sold), 05 Boxster S (sold), 00 Ferrari 360 (sold), 05 Boxster S (sold), 01 Boxster S (sold), 99 Boxster (sold)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:16 AM.
| |