Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-12-2011, 10:09 AM   #1
Registered User
 
laphan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 144
Quote:
Originally Posted by ekam
I think you mean the opposite. Higher elevation = thinner air = less efficient turbo.
Nope,
turbo actually works better than NA in high altitude:

A turbocharger also helps at high altitudes, where the air is less dense. Normal engines will experience reduced power at high altitudes because for each stroke of the piston, the engine will get a smaller mass of air. A turbocharged engine may also have reduced power, but the reduction will be less dramatic because the thinner air is easier for the turbocharger to pump.

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/turbo.htm/printable
laphan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2011, 02:51 PM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 328
Quote:
Originally Posted by laphan
Nope,
turbo actually works better than NA in high altitude:

A turbocharger also helps at high altitudes, where the air is less dense. Normal engines will experience reduced power at high altitudes because for each stroke of the piston, the engine will get a smaller mass of air. A turbocharged engine may also have reduced power, but the reduction will be less dramatic because the thinner air is easier for the turbocharger to pump.

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/turbo.htm/printable

Beat me to it, was about to come in and defend you there. Less atmospheric pressure is no problem with forced induction, you just run more boost. No such option with NA engines......

Also dont forget that density altitude is a figure that constantly changes (even in the one spot) meaning that your NA engine will always be adjusting to the amount of air pressure in the atmosphere and therefore never really be tuned perfectly.

Sam
sparker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2011, 03:52 PM   #3
Registered User
 
jacabean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: mass
Posts: 731
turbos also make massive torque considering their usually small engine displacement. you would need very large displacement on an n/a motor to produce those torque numbers. Turbos tend to be very fast up hill also.
jacabean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2011, 04:16 PM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 402
Driving my sister's Audi A4 with the 2.0 turbocharged four, I personally feel more comfortable driving a naturally aspirated engine better. There is pretty much no turbo lag on the A4, but the problem is that there is a very flat torque curve and its actually quite hard to modulate power, it's either off on on. It might be something specific about Audi, but that's been my experience.
Lordblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page