04-06-2010, 01:07 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Greensboro
Posts: 120
|
thanks all for the insight. any trips would be just me and a cute thin swiss girl
I didn't say the 911 was claustrophobic, I was referring to the boxster since there's kinda just a wall behind ya the entire time.
I wasn't disappointed in the ride comfort in the boxster, I could probably handle that. it was just that feeling of a small space for long periods. top down the entire time on highways is not an option most likely due to speeds involved, esp on the autobahn (my hairline is already half gone. or is it half full?). otherwise, i'll pretty much have the top 99% of the time in town. ability to put top down is absolutely a must. Life's too short for a hardtop for me. I never have and never will be timed on a track.
I'm also looking at latest models (987 and 997). I drove both back to back last Nov. there is definitely a difference! the boxster steering felt totally numb by comparison--yes the 911 has that much road feel (or at least, the new ones). but def not a deal breaker. The comments about 4S are well-noted. it can get slippery here in winter, esp at higher alititudes. awd would certainly provide some peace of mind.... as long as it didn't make me too complacent.
I was confused about comments regarding room with seats folded down. doesn't it work the same in the cab vs coupe?
good idea to post in 911 forum. I just figured there'd be lots of folks here who'd done several XXXX mile trips in a box and wanted to see if it got annoying because of interior room.
thanks again
crcguy
|
|
|
04-06-2010, 01:57 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Gatineau, Qc
Posts: 285
|
I'v done a 2720 km (almost 1 700 miles) trip (Ottawa - Prince Edward Island - Ottawa) in a 99 boxster and never feelt like missing space behind me :P most of the time the top was down, but It was very confortable and nothing to complain.. Space in the two trunk was just perfect for me and my girlfriend. I would do it again anytime!
|
|
|
04-06-2010, 02:18 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 7,243
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CRCGuy
thanks all for the insight. any trips would be just me and a cute thin swiss girl 
|
I'm sure there's a few fat ugly chicks in Switzerland (quality control workers in chocolate factories?) but I've never encountered one on my trips to your part of the world.
Same thing goes for the girls in Norway and Sweden.
|
|
|
04-06-2010, 02:27 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Omaha
Posts: 2,954
|
Have you thought about a Cayman? Might be the best of both worlds.
__________________
GPRPCA Chief Driving Instructor
2008 Boxster S Limited Edition #005
2008 Cayman S Sport - Signal Green
1989 928 S4 5 spd - black
|
|
|
04-06-2010, 02:32 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 146
|
The interior size difference really isn't that much. The 911's barely a 4 seater. I'd bet the difference between the volume of the back seat in the 911 and the boxster's rear trunk+area on top of the engine is pretty small. My dad and I did 1400 miles from Arizona to Louisiana and never had any claustrophobia issues. We're both decent sized guys, and we had the top up the second half to minimize our skin cancer. I think my dogs get claustrophobic after about 8 hours of traveling.
|
|
|
04-06-2010, 10:53 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Greensboro
Posts: 120
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ARModen
The interior size difference really isn't that much. The 911's barely a 4 seater. I'd bet the difference between the volume of the back seat in the 911 and the boxster's rear trunk+area on top of the engine is pretty small. My dad and I did 1400 miles from Arizona to Louisiana and never had any claustrophobia issues. We're both decent sized guys, and we had the top up the second half to minimize our skin cancer. I think my dogs get claustrophobic after about 8 hours of traveling.
|
good stuff! that's quite a trip. hell, 8hrs would take me all the way down to Tuscany I think! quite reassuring. thanks
As for fat chicks...I must say that one of the reasons I really like it here is that in general women (and men) are much better looking, esp w.r.t weight. My last trip back to the states was a real eye opener. I went to pay for gas and there was a 300lb+ woman with two fat kids (no more than 5 or 6yrs old). she was buying pork rinds and a 32oz coke (not diet). The fat hanging off her arms almost knocked the coke over when she went to pay. My taxes will be paying for her triple by-pass in a few years. it just disgusted me. There is little incentive to be healthy in the states. here in switzerland, one's health insurance (which is mandatory for everyone) is cheaper the better shape you're in. what a concept. yes, you'll find seriously overweight people here, but it's very rare. you won't see someone circle a grocery store parking lot 3 times waiting for that spot 20ft from the door, burning dino oil instead of burning body fat by walking a hundred feet. In fact, you see business men in full suits riding a bike to work rather than driving. of course, it's not so feasible in the states giving the infrastructure, but even if bike paths were present everywhere, you'd still never see such a thing. when gas is cheaper than milk, there's little incentive to do the right thing. gas here is over $6/gal. I will only use this boxster (or 911) for occasional trips, not daily use. But I digress---that's a whole other thread....
|
|
|
04-07-2010, 07:48 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
|
^ I find it interesting that the countries with the highest per capita GDP in Europe (Scandinavia, Belgium, Switz, Lux, etc. are the countries that invest the most on healthcare and education...all possible with far less manufacturing than the rest of the economic powers. I guess a highly educated and very fit worker tends to be more valuable than a 300 pounder with skills that don't go beyond stocking shelves at Wal-Mart and Target. A big reason why we are fat aren't just the bad food choices, its the bad food. The sugar content in everything off the charts here. Diet alternatives are worse for you, as is anything created in a lab by evil scientists.
And eating healthy in this country is now considered a luxury.
p.s.
Have you considred a 996 Turbo? You get your all wheel drive, don't have worry about gas mileage because you don't drive much, you get one of only two Porsches with a real dry sump race engine and lots of comfort for long rides.
Not to mention a car that can be parked next to any Ferrari.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
|
|
|
04-07-2010, 08:34 AM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 146
|
Since this thread has already divurged off topic...
You know people always talk bad about the food and motivation of Americans, but I'd bet money that it's our cars that are killing us. So much of this country is so spread out, and so little is covered by any real mass transportation, that you really have to drive everywhere.
I wonder if anyone has done a study comparing the health of the population with how far they live from their jobs, and how they get to and from work. For example manufacturing jobs tend to happen away from city centers. So those countries you listed may have a large advantage health-wise just because a lot of the population can walk to work.
When I was in college I was in decent shape even though I ate fast food, drank lots of booze, and never worked out. Between walking around campus and walking to and from the bus stops, I probably did 4-5 miles of walking a day. I also rode my bike to school (~5 miles) every so often because it was faster than the bus. This was out in Tucson, and it's the only town I've lived in that has both good mass transit, and bike friendly streets.
|
|
|
04-07-2010, 08:51 AM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 7,243
|
ARModen, you were much younger then too. Don't forget that your metabolism rate reduces as you age.
CRCguy, I have take four very long trips in my boxster now. When I'm by myself there's plenty of interior room because I throw stuff in the passenger side. However, when the wife is along there's no place for her purse, the mini cooler, the small blanket for when she's cold (I'm never cold... typical man I guess) and so forth.
It's only on long trips with my wife that I wish I had a 911 coupe. Driving long distances on the freeway with the top down is really noisy and not what it's cracked up to be in my mind. I usually keep the top up on long trips to regulate temperature in the cabin, lower the noise, and be able to hear my stereo or my passenger speak at normal tones.
Of course, the other time I wish I had a 911 coupe is when I want to put my foot in it and get the same acceleration I have in my BMW 550i—and that's when I am totally underwhelmed by my boxster's puny motor. Even the 3.4 S motors in the newer boxsters don't have the torque of my V8 Bimmer motor. For that reason, having a C4S or a Turbo is what I'd trade up to if I had oodles of cash.
... and I would never look back and wish I still had a convertible. Might be different if I lived in SOCAL where it's 75 degrees most of the year, but that ain't the case here in Sauna City, USA.
|
|
|
04-08-2010, 12:35 PM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Greensboro
Posts: 120
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ARModen
Since this thread has already divurged off topic...
You know people always talk bad about the food and motivation of Americans, but I'd bet money that it's our cars that are killing us. So much of this country is so spread out, and so little is covered by any real mass transportation, that you really have to drive everywhere.
. Between walking around campus and walking to and from the bus stops, I probably did 4-5 miles of walking a day. I also rode my bike to school (~5 miles) every so often because it was faster than the bus. This was out in Tucson, and it's the only town I've lived in that has both good mass transit, and bike friendly streets.
|
Since I started this thread Ill indulge the divergence. I believe you're spot on. you really do have to drive everywhere in the states. having the public transport setup they have here would be a monstrous undertaking. You can literally go anywhere here by tram, train and foot. And you can set your watches by the trains. insanely reliable. as you suggest, the walking really does pay dividends. What the US lacks most are sidewalks, which you only find in neighborhoods and even then not everywhere. Here, pretty much every road has sidewalks on both sides. I walk about 3 to 4 miles a day all told. mostly by choice. I even walk past three tram stops just because it's so easy here and everyone does it. when you come to a yellow crosswalk (sans crossing light), you do NOT wait for cars. The law says peds have the right of way and cars must stop. It's an eerie feeling, but I'm so used to it now I almost never even look both ways any more (sorry mom!). They really encourage as little use of dino oil and as much walking as possible. At some stop lights, you are asked (read required) to turn your motor off while it's red. Of course, some US cities are doing a decent job with subway lines. It's the urban sprawl that screws things up. If you think the USA is bad, try living in England for a spell. It's a total nightmare to get anywhere.
|
|
|
04-08-2010, 12:23 PM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Greensboro
Posts: 120
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Perfectlap
^ I
And eating healthy in this country is now considered a luxury.
p.s.
Have you considred a 996 Turbo? You get your all wheel drive, don't have worry about gas mileage because you don't drive much, you get one of only two Porsches with a real dry sump race engine and lots of comfort for long rides.
Not to mention a car that can be parked next to any Ferrari.
|
you know, I haven't. It's an interesting option. I wonder what the clutch is like to operate. I really like the clutch feel and pedal effort of the newer models. but I guess Ill know in about 10 secs during a test drive. thanks for the suggestion
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:48 PM.
| |