03-05-2010, 02:56 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Greensboro
Posts: 120
|
What was "lost" from the 986?
I'm aware of the various changes (improvements?) made when the 987 model came out.
But for those that moved from 986 to 987, is there anything that you feel was "lost"? Something in the way the car feels or sounds or drives etc... that you feel was actually better in the 986 (besides just visual/cosmetic things).
crcguy
|
|
|
03-05-2010, 03:59 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 1,561
|
The 986 and the 987 are great cars. The 987 is better. Just like the 987.2 is better than the 987.1. Porsche is very good at doing this.
|
|
|
03-05-2010, 04:53 AM
|
#3
|
Porscheectomy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 3,011
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flavor 987S
The 986 and the 987 are great cars. The 987 is better. Just like the 987.2 is better than the 987.1. Porsche is very good at doing this.
|
That depends on your point of view and definition of "better".
More options, more refinement, more weight, more isolation, all could be considered better or worse depending on what you're looking for.
I personally prefer the 1978-83 911 SC to any 911 that came after, I think it's "better" from a driver's car standpoint, most would probably disagree.
|
|
|
03-05-2010, 05:19 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,576
|
I've owned a base 986 and an S 986
and taken test drives in the 987. I flat out liked the 987 better. Not better enough to spend my money upgrading but then I don't buy new cars and am a relative tightwad.
Money no object, given my choice I'd get the 987 and fit it with a spare tire from a 986 and an LN IMS if it was pre-2009. The 987 not having a spare is the one big complaint I've heard.
For the price, the 986 is the bargain and I still find joy in driving it even after 5 years. It waits in the garage with its top down for tomorrow and its 60 degrees...finally. I can't imagine the 987 would give any more fun ... how could it?
|
|
|
03-05-2010, 07:39 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
|
Everyone has their opinion and mine is that the looks really didn't produce an evolution.
The kidney bean headlights were 100% Porsche. They were replaced with something you'd see on many Japanese and Korean cars. That was a big disappointment for me. The 996 Turbo headlights seemed like that evolution and I was hoping to see something like that but with an update tossed in on the 987.
The doorhandle went to a traditional design from the minimalist 986. Didn't like that either.
The air intake....what in the world is that?  A very fluid 986 intake form was replaced with something really bizzare.
Wheels. I haven't seen anything on the Boxster in factory form that I feel would get the 'classic Porsche' brand like the 5 spoke Carreras.
Overall, the fender lines seem more a throw back to the 993 than original Boxster concept that seem more LeMans prototype.
Interior. This is where they really lost me. The materials were a huge improvement from the plastic bits that were never updated from 1997-2004.
That was a mistake. Porsche should have upgraded the materials but kep the concept interior design. What we got instead was what I would call frumpy.
The steering wheel on the 987 and 997 in particular seem very boring to me.
The dash seems more like something you would see on VW or Audi. Porsches shouldn't look like those cars, neither the headlights nor the interiors. I know they're cousins but we are the hot cousin.
All that said, the engineering is obviously a big improvement, particularly the 3.4 engine. But as is always the case with Porsche 'over-engineering' results in a car that feels a bit more disconnected and numb.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
|
|
|
03-05-2010, 08:11 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 92
|
I drove a 987 and instantly noticed I would miss the mechanical connection between the throttle pedal and the throttle body. So I decided to stay with my pre-00 986.
Plus I have no money.
__________________
When I set my timing, why do I flush, then pee?
|
|
|
03-05-2010, 10:56 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Torrance, California
Posts: 132
|
I own a mint 2003 986 S and have driven the 987 recently for a few days when my dealer gave me a loaner. They want me to upgrade so bad they found me a loaner in the same color.
I have the same issues with the interior as Perfectlap. I don't like all the straight lines and painted plastic horizontal strips. Personally I think the 986 interior will full leather is a better design. I found the instrument cluster to be more confusing, especially when the radio kept putting song titles up in the middle of the tach?!
I also found the engine note to be less of a growl like a tiger, and more of an electronic note. In general it felt less mechanical and more electronic and complicated. To be fair it did have paddle shifters and I am a fan of simple cars. I also do not like the side vents.
There were things I did like better. I think the swept back changes to the sheet metal are nice. I like the new headlights too. I guess it's faster?.. but it didn't feel faster. It just felt easier. To me the 986 is the design that caused a sensation, and the best iteration is the 03-04 S.
The dealer was salivating when I brought it back... they thought I was crazy not to want the new one.
|
|
|
03-05-2010, 01:12 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southern New jersey
Posts: 1,054
|
Different strokes for different folks!
I like the 987 (of course, I bought one), and thought the 986 is starting to look a bit dated, including the side vents and interior. My wife says it looks a BIT less like a Miata! (sorry) I love the clean, uncluttered lines of the interior. You do get used to the scrolling station titles, but I do wish you could display only the station number(freq.). The radio presets also tend to blend together, many small buttons in a row.
Personally, if had had wanted a "raw" feeling car, I would have bought an S2000. I do wish they had kept the weight and size down though. Oddly, I like the brake pedal feel of my '94 Integra better than the 987, whih is too soft, with too much initial travel. I like a rock hard brake pedal. I didn't notice any difference in the gas pedal feel compared to "cable" cars.
Steve
I also would like to have a dipstick! ( and a spare )
|
|
|
03-09-2010, 06:07 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Gatineau, Qc
Posts: 285
|
I just upgraded from a Boxster 99 (986) to a boxster S 2006 (987S), I like the 987! It is a very nice upgrade, and I have nothing to complain.. the only thing I am missing yet (after 2-3 rides) is the windows button in the center.
I was use to do everything (Switch Gear, Control Radio, Temperature and Windows) with my right hand while leaving my left hand always on the steering. So I could put the windows up between shifting when entering on the Highway.. Now I feel all lost having to take my left hand to control windows..
But I'm sure I'll get used to it..
|
|
|
03-14-2010, 11:04 AM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 628
|
I can't say what was 'lost' from the 986, but I think alot was lost from driving in general.
Kurt, I never drove a 914/6 but I loved my 914/4! It wasn't fast, but I was living on Maui at the time so it had plenty of power for the roads there. It was a blast to drive, took a beating and never let me down.
My 2000 986S (no T/C) is the newest Porsche I've owned and love it, but compared to the old Porsches it's missing that "feel." I know modern cars with all the computer controlled throttles, transmissions, brakes, and differentials are superior in every way but is technology taking cars ahead into the future in the wrong direction? As an engineer I love all the advancements but we seem to be getting disconnected from the thrill that turned us into gearheads. Is being cushioned by a cloud of technology always a good thing? The Nissan GTR comes to mind, capable of making almost any driver look like a pro. Some cars should still be produced that still holds onto that old go-kart thrill of driving.
Are cars too safe, too easy to drive now? Seems like that's the way society of going now, safe cars, safe sex, safe war, don't spank your kids, don't yell at new recruits in Basic Training 'cuz you'll stress them out. Due to new safety standards and legislations we will never have exciting cars to drive anymore, cars that were just bare bones excitement unless you're lucky enough to save a classic car to drive. Sometimes a 50hp 356 can be more fun than a 2010 Carrera.
A good friend of mine is an ex-Navy pilot, used to be THE test pilot for the F14 Tomcat before delivery to the Navy. He told me in many ways he enjoys flying his ultralight, felt the thrill of being a pilot, over the F14!
|
|
|
03-05-2010, 01:02 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 529
|
Two things come to mind immediately.
No dipstick on the newer 986s and 987s.
I don't really like the digital readout, especially when you also need to wait an eternity to get a reading, after the engine's been running.
Moving the digital speedo to the side gauge, rather than under the tach's center gauge.
Happy Boxstering,
Pedro
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is: Racecar!
|
|
|
03-05-2010, 01:34 PM
|
#12
|
Porscheectomy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 3,011
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ppbon
Two things come to mind immediately.
No dipstick on the newer 986s and 987s.
I don't really like the digital readout, especially when you also need to wait an eternity to get a reading, after the engine's been running.
Moving the digital speedo to the side gauge, rather than under the tach's center gauge.
Happy Boxstering,
Pedro
|
I think the speed moved over to the speedometer in '01.
|
|
|
03-05-2010, 01:48 PM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 530
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ppbon

Happy Boxstering,
Pedro
|
Sorry for the hijack, but what are those two things in the foam? Boat transom plugs?
__________________
Jack
2000 Boxster S - gone -
2006 Audi A6 Quattro 3.2
|
|
|
03-05-2010, 03:36 PM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Du Monde
Posts: 2,199
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackG
Sorry for the hijack, but what are those two things in the foam? Boat transom plugs?
|
spare bleed valves
Cheers!
|
|
|
03-05-2010, 03:49 PM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Du Monde
Posts: 2,199
|
I'm older so to my experience a Sports Car is a very specific and narrowly defined thing. Thats what Sports Cars were when I became driving age and that's what I always think of when someone says Sports Car.
This usually meant balance, lightness, handling and braking over power. It also usually meant a minimum of creature comforts - the comfort was in the driving, not the cupholders, stereo, traction control and digital doowhackys.
It also meant that it wasn't created for, or marketed to, everybody. It was a daily driver for only the most Hard Core. Taking an Infinity GXX and rebadging it a 350Z 'Sports Car' is exactly the opposite of what a Sports Car used to mean.
In this light, the 986 is much closer to it's original vision than the 987 will ever be.
I could buy any Boxster on the market, but the only ones I'd ever own would be the 1st Gen 986.
Good thing for Porsche that not everyone shares my view.
Cheers!
|
|
|
03-06-2010, 02:56 AM
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,656
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lil bastard
I'm older so to my experience a Sports Car is a very specific and narrowly defined thing. Thats what Sports Cars were when I became driving age and that's what I always think of when someone says Sports Car.
This usually meant balance, lightness, handling and braking over power. It also usually meant a minimum of creature comforts - the comfort was in the driving, not the cupholders, stereo, traction control and digital doowhackys.
It also meant that it wasn't created for, or marketed to, everybody. It was a daily driver for only the most Hard Core. Taking an Infinity GXX and rebadging it a 350Z 'Sports Car' is exactly the opposite of what a Sports Car used to mean.
In this light, the 986 is much closer to it's original vision than the 987 will ever be.
I could buy any Boxster on the market, but the only ones I'd ever own would be the 1st Gen 986.
Good thing for Porsche that not everyone shares my view.
Cheers!
|
Well people are getting dumber these days, they have to look at the TPMS to check tire pressure as supposed to the original method. They also need a computer to tell them when they need oil change.
I work in IT and even I hate all these computer crap overtaking cars!
Sorry my friend has a Superformance Cobra, no computers, no stability control, no airbags. You can put your arms over the door (you cannot do this anymore on modern cars because of increased safety). You need to learn how to drive it because there's no computer to safe your life.
For the same reason I kind of want a 356 Speedster, but my friends told me I already got a great car and should stop dreaming.
|
|
|
03-05-2010, 05:10 PM
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 529
|
Good Eye...
... they are boat transom plugs which I use for completely silencing my PSE (Pedro Sport Exhaust) hack by forcing the exhaust through the OEM muffler.
Happy Boxstering,
Pedro
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is: Racecar!
|
|
|
03-05-2010, 05:17 PM
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Du Monde
Posts: 2,199
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ppbon
... they are boat transom plugs which I use for completely silencing my PSE (Pedro Sport Exhaust) hack by forcing the exhaust through the OEM muffler.
Happy Boxstering,
Pedro
|
OK... that's a new one on me. It's a good day whenever you learn something new. Today was a good day!
Cheers!
|
|
|
03-18-2011, 07:35 PM
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Aspen, CO
Posts: 131
|
Having owned a 2004 Boxster S and a brand new 2011 Boxster S I can say the new one is definitely better bcus:
40 more bhp and more torque. more fun to drive. great road feel.
the 6 speed is smoother, better. a true joy. best stick ever.
the digital speedo is much better located as are all the readout. the dash is much improved.
Lots more toys-
Computer standard
tire pressure monitor
xenon lights that turn
ventillated seats
power seats with memory
Sports Exhaust awesome.
Navigation has altitude feature. great in the mountains.
bluetooth
XM radio built in rather than an add-on
the LED lights look good
self-dimming mirrors
rain sensitive wipers
only downside is no spare
all this for $7k more in 10 years. Not bad.
Life is good.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:12 AM.
| |