03-09-2005, 05:20 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
It is all good stuff. From my point of view:
Porsche builds cars to make money and they have their own cultural biases. They have the 911 franschise to protect and they need the Boxster. It is a tightrope they walk everyday. Also, being German I can say that arrogance is our birthright. It shows up in cars big time!
Those 911 owners have their own reality. I am fine to let them have it. Hey, they pay enough for it. When I have a 911 to drive, it is a kick. Yet, give me a S Box any old time.
RE: Women and Box S's? I love to see a pretty woman in a boxster, any model, preferrably siting next to me in mine!
BTW- on a track, give me a Box S and I will take on any base 911 out there. Money on me????
|
|
|
03-09-2005, 01:15 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 163
|
i put would money on a boxster stock for stock and equal driving ablities
Last edited by phrankandbeanz; 03-09-2005 at 05:19 PM.
|
|
|
03-09-2005, 03:19 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Huntersville, NC
Posts: 655
|
997 vs. 987
Whatever the perception whatever the marketing ploy whatever the whatevers the fact is that the Boxster holds its own vs. anything placed on the road against it. We should be not only happy to own such a fine car but we are immensely blessed to drive such a fine machine. I don't feel chided by not owning a 911 or depressed about it. I feel that our car is super quick has the same brand as the 997 and the Cayenne etc. As far as racing heritage lots of the Porsche victory have been by prototypes 917's, 962's etc not necessarily the 911. So it's not the racing prowess of the 911 or the handling of the 911 for sure, it is just the marketing of the 911 that pushes the Boxster aside to a lesser role.
Proof for all Boxster malcontents is the fact that automobile magazine after magazine picks the Boxster over the 911 time and time again. More fun to drive, get more for your money, and much better looking. What more can we say about our car that is a KICK ASS CAR. Screw the rest.
__________________
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate
|
|
|
03-13-2005, 10:36 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 30
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by phrankandbeanz
i put would money on a boxster stock for stock and equal driving ablities
|
On an autocross track, totally. On a road track, though, I'd be very surprised if I'd be faster in a Boxster than a 993 or later. The bigger car just has the grunt on any sort of straightaway, and while after driving both I think the Boxster turns better, the margin isn't enough to make up for the grunt in the 911.
(Sorry, not a flame, but that extra $50K has to buy something , right?
A.
|
|
|
03-14-2005, 05:35 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
"(Sorry, not a flame, but that extra $50K has to buy something , right?"
Higher repair bills and insurance rates?????????????
|
|
|
03-14-2005, 08:37 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 401
|
The extra $50K is going to buy a lot of whine when the Cayman S starts ripping it up!
I've been reading up on 911 owners reactions to the Cayman S. I thought it would've been positive. Instead, I see a lot of hate. Those guys crack me up. They are as bad as the Corvette guys. Just full of themselves and sometimes outright clueless. Some even justify the wrong engine location by saying it's heritage and that's why it's the only real Porsche.
-
|
|
|
03-14-2005, 08:45 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 30
|
My favorite quote is still that the 911 is a triumph of design over physics. They are very nice cars, though expensive for the performance. Claiming that the 911 is the best car in the universe is tough to back up, the Ariel Atom, for instance, has better power/weight than an Enzo and costs $30K.
__________________
Andy Boyd
|
|
|
03-14-2005, 11:26 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
|
I still don't understand why the Boxster and the 996 are even compared.
They are two totally different cars.
Its kind of like a M3 owner complaining about/slamming the Z4.
The Cayman is a diffrent story I suppose because both the Cayman
and the 996 are actually engineered to be tin top racers.
But I will believe the overall track superiority of one ore the other when the
first Cayman wins at LeMans.
 just kidding, if the Cayman beat the 996 well that would be a nightmare for Porsche.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
|
|
|
03-14-2005, 02:40 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 163
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lux
The extra $50K is going to buy a lot of whine when the Cayman S starts ripping it up!
I've been reading up on 911 owners reactions to the Cayman S. I thought it would've been positive. Instead, I see a lot of hate. Those guys crack me up. They are as bad as the Corvette guys. Just full of themselves and sometimes outright clueless. Some even justify the wrong engine location by saying it's heritage and that's why it's the only real Porsche.
-
|
i hear ya man!
|
|
|
03-14-2005, 03:40 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,033
|
LOL, what have the 911 owners been saying exactly?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:05 PM.
| |