Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-02-2009, 05:31 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 434
Agency Power intake for 986? Anyone?

Has anyone fitted the Agency Power cold-air intake on their Boxster? I see lots of mention of the evoms intake, but a search for the Agency Power intake came up empty.

Just curious if anyone has tried this intake and if so, how it fared for them...

Thanks in advance!
sd_boxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 08:16 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 828
Hello SD, newbies unite....You got me curious, I found this

http://www.vividracing.com/blog/announcing-new-products-specials-and-info/2008-subaru-wrx-agency-power-intake-test/


Perhaps some other members can comment on whether they think you would feel these numeric improvements...what's the $$ for this modest gain??

FYI this test wasn't on a Boxster but a wrx, I think that car is turbocharged which skews the results in terms of applying the same gains to a Pcar..

Last edited by eightsandaces; 03-03-2009 at 08:19 AM.
eightsandaces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 08:31 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 726
turbocharged cars are notorious for getting LARGE power gains from simple intake/ehxaust mods.

I have no idea what real gain you would get from this intake on a boxster - i'll let someone else comment on that - but I do know that you CANNOT make any conclusions about what WE would gain based on what a turbo WRX gained..

apples and oranges
23109VC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 09:00 AM   #4
Registered User
 
ChrisZang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Carlos, CA 94070
Posts: 1,450
I wouldn't see why you would get a different result (or lack thereof) with this intake as you would get from the Evo intake.

They all have the same principle:
* Pull out the old air box (which by the way already IS a cold air intake),
* replace it with a new housing,
* put a cone air filter in and
* replace the tubing between the air box and the throttle body with a bit more streamlined tubing.
I don't think that there is much difference in who makes these intakes

So read up on the Evo intake and form your opinion.
I did that and decided that the few HP that you *might* gain are not worth the pain in the butt removal of the OEM airbox and the danger of fouling up the MAF with the oil from the K&N filter ....
__________________
I still wave at Boxsters, but they no longer wave back :-(
2002 Boxster S "Violet" (sold but not forgotten)
2009 Carrera 4S "Kelsey" (current ride)
2015 FIAT 500e "Nikki" my commuter car
ChrisZang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 10:11 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 434
I appreciate the comments. While I agree that the concept behind the intakes is the same, the materials (Agency Power is powdercoated steel, evoms is plastic/abs) differ, and I was hoping for comments about fitment for one over the other.

Personally, the performance "gain" is moot - if there is a 2HP +/- fluctuation, it won't change performance significantly. However, I love the sound that a cone-filter intake adds to a N/A car - that's why I want to add the CAI.

Thanks for the comments so far!
sd_boxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 10:43 AM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 828
Quote:
Originally Posted by sd_boxster
I appreciate the comments. While I agree that the concept behind the intakes is the same, the materials (Agency Power is powdercoated steel, evoms is plastic/abs) differ, and I was hoping for comments about fitment for one over the other.

Personally, the performance "gain" is moot - if there is a 2HP +/- fluctuation, it won't change performance significantly. However, I love the sound that a cone-filter intake adds to a N/A car - that's why I want to add the CAI.

Thanks for the comments so far!

If the only goal is "playing cards in the spokes" then try de snorkeling first. It's free and reversible if you do it carefully.
eightsandaces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 11:19 AM   #7
Registered User
 
ChrisZang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Carlos, CA 94070
Posts: 1,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by sd_boxster
I appreciate the comments. While I agree that the concept behind the intakes is the same, the materials (Agency Power is powdercoated steel, evoms is plastic/abs) differ, and I was hoping for comments about fitment for one over the other.

Personally, the performance "gain" is moot - if there is a 2HP +/- fluctuation, it won't change performance significantly. However, I love the sound that a cone-filter intake adds to a N/A car - that's why I want to add the CAI.

Thanks for the comments so far!
not sure if it helps but sometime ago I replaced the OEM air filter with a K&N (oiled) air filter, difference in sound: almost zero, but it set me back by $225 for a new MAF
Then I tried de-snorkeling and this has a much bigger effect
I am also a sound junkie, here's a list of my "sound mods" on a scale of 1 (least effect to 5 most effect)

GHL exhaust: 5 (I took it off after 1 year as I couldn't stand the drone anymore) and went with the next line item:
"gutted" exhaust: 4 (open the exhaust, take the baffling out, close it)
de-snorkeled: 3
Secondary cat bypass pipes: 3
K&N air filter: 1

oh, yes I forgot one:
driving with open pipes: 100 (on a scale from 1 to 5)
__________________
I still wave at Boxsters, but they no longer wave back :-(
2002 Boxster S "Violet" (sold but not forgotten)
2009 Carrera 4S "Kelsey" (current ride)
2015 FIAT 500e "Nikki" my commuter car
ChrisZang is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page