09-25-2008, 10:19 PM
|
#1
|
|
Track rat
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern ID
Posts: 3,701
|
Just remember Porsche didn't put that screen in there just to piss you off. It is there to prevent your motor from injesting large chunks that often fall into the bottom of the air box when changing the filter. Toolpants has some great pictures of nasty STUFF in the air box. Big bugs, ciggy butts, chunks-o-rubber etc.
__________________
2009 Cayman 2.9L PDK (with a few tweaks)
PCA-GPX Chief Driving Instructor-Ret.
|
|
|
09-26-2008, 04:31 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,209
|
As long as you clean around the filter box before you pull the filter tray out, you should be fine. If "Big bugs, ciggy butts, chunks-o-rubber etc." are getting past the air filter, what the hell is the air filter even there for? Sorry, but if ******************** like that is on the filtered side someone must be running with NO filter.
I know of no other company that has a screen to catch the big chunks. I'm cutting out this screen and replacing the one in my car.
__________________
Sadly on the outside looking in.
"Drive it like the Doctor ordered"
|
|
|
09-26-2008, 04:51 AM
|
#3
|
|
07 Carrera S Cab
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,273
|
Wow, there sure are a lot of restrictions in the airbox. Thanks for sharing.
I'll probably keep mine in because with my luck, when I remove my air filter to replace it, some crap will fall into that area before I even get a chance to stick my vacuum down the airbox.
__________________
Current: 07 Carrera S Cab in Midnight Blue
Previous: 01 Boxster in Arctic Silver, 86 944 in Guards Red
|
|
|
09-26-2008, 04:33 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 126
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jaxonalden
I know of no other company that has a screen to catch the big chunks. I'm cutting out this screen and replacing the one in my car.
|
Most of them do. In fact, every car I've worked on that had a MAF (as opposed to a MAP) had a screen like the one here.
Not only does it serve to keep out "large chunks", but it more importantly influences airflow over the sensor.
You can read more here: http://www.gmtips.com/3rd-degree/dox/tips/maf/maf-screen.htm
__________________
2000 Guards Red Boxster
There is no substitute.
|
|
|
09-26-2008, 07:45 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,746
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Padawan
Most of them do. In fact, every car I've worked on that had a MAF (as opposed to a MAP) had a screen like the one here.
Not only does it serve to keep out "large chunks", but it more importantly influences airflow over the sensor.
You can read more here: http://www.gmtips.com/3rd-degree/dox/tips/maf/maf-screen.htm
|
Ditto that. I've put in a couple of CAI (Cold Air Induction) kits in other cars, I haven't encountered one without the screen, domestic or import. Oh and BTW, there was always a seat of the pants difference felt with them, one verified a 13 HP increase on the dyno, these completely replaced the stock airboxes though.
Last edited by coreseller; 09-26-2008 at 07:47 PM.
|
|
|
09-27-2008, 07:53 AM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,209
|
OK, I'll post this to anyone out there that has an EVO intake installed. Does that intake have a screen just before the OEM Mass Airflow Sensor? I went to the site that sells them and could not see or read that it does. It does utilize the stock sensor so, if you guys are right, will have this screen installed. I checked my SUV, my wife's car and my Harley and none of then have a screen in front of the MAS. Everything else I own has a carburetor.
I can see where you think it should. In high RPM engines, the air flowing past the MAS will act like a wing on a high performance aircraft and will create a boundary layer of air giving false readings. The screen will act as vortex generator breaking up that boundary layer. On an aircraft wing it allows the flight controls to be more effective at high air speeds.
So with that said I need someone that knows first hand what the EVO intake has inside that pipe. Pictures would be nice also. Until then I'm swapping out for my screen-less stack (which only took an Exacto knife to cut out). If I get a CEL, I will post it and won't hide the fact that I was wrong in my assumption.
I should just go ahead an get the EVO because the air in a stock air box takes no less than 4-90 degree turns in less than 12 inches!
__________________
Sadly on the outside looking in.
"Drive it like the Doctor ordered"
Last edited by Jaxonalden; 09-27-2008 at 07:56 AM.
|
|
|
09-27-2008, 10:10 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Coastal Oak Forest
Posts: 1,069
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jaxonalden
OK, I'll post this to anyone out there that has an EVO intake installed. Does that intake have a screen just before the OEM Mass Airflow Sensor? I went to the site that sells them and could not see or read that it does. It does utilize the stock sensor so, if you guys are right, will have this screen installed. I checked my SUV, my wife's car and my Harley and none of then have a screen in front of the MAS. Everything else I own has a carburetor.
I can see where you think it should. In high RPM engines, the air flowing past the MAS will act like a wing on a high performance aircraft and will create a boundary layer of air giving false readings. The screen will act as vortex generator breaking up that boundary layer. On an aircraft wing it allows the flight controls to be more effective at high air speeds.
So with that said I need someone that knows first hand what the EVO intake has inside that pipe. Pictures would be nice also. Until then I'm swapping out for my screen-less stack (which only took an Exacto knife to cut out). If I get a CEL, I will post it and won't hide the fact that I was wrong in my assumption.
I should just go ahead an get the EVO because the air in a stock air box takes no less than 4-90 degree turns in less than 12 inches!
|
You may not get a Change Engine Light, but it may run like crap or stumble at certain RPM ranges, etc.
I put a K&N ram tube, ot whatever they called it, on an RX8 and it used the original MAS and had no screen in it, but neither did the OEM airbox.
Made the car so loud on intake noise, I couldn't stand it.
Know anyone who wants one?
__________________
Sold - Black on Sand Beige 2006 S - 48K miles
18x8.5 and 10 OZ Alleggerita HLT Anthracite wheels and anthracite Cayman side grilles - lovingly adjusted Schnell Short Shift
|
|
|
09-27-2008, 06:30 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,209
|
Swap out and 50 mile test drive complete. No CEL and I can swear that the intake noise is throatier, maybe the screen suppresses some noise. Driving the car through the twisty's does seem to run similar to a sexual molested primate. IMHO
__________________
Sadly on the outside looking in.
"Drive it like the Doctor ordered"
Last edited by Jaxonalden; 09-27-2008 at 06:46 PM.
|
|
|
09-26-2008, 06:48 AM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,656
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Topless
Just remember Porsche didn't put that screen in there just to piss you off. It is there to prevent your motor from injesting large chunks that often fall into the bottom of the air box when changing the filter. Toolpants has some great pictures of nasty STUFF in the air box. Big bugs, ciggy butts, chunks-o-rubber etc.
|
Hey now. It's just this week's episode on "How I out smart Porsche engineers".
|
|
|
09-26-2008, 08:11 AM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,209
|
Boxtaboy,
I understand your concerns, but don't stop with the P car. As I said in my post, I don't know of any other car that has a screen aft of the air filter. So if you own other cars you should be just as careful not to leave any screws, paperclips or club sandwiches in your air box.
Ekam,
I'm not trying to outsmart the Porsche engineers, I'm just trying to free up the car from the federal mandates that are imposed on imports. You know the ones that limit performance in the name of the environment and keeping the neighbors happy.
__________________
Sadly on the outside looking in.
"Drive it like the Doctor ordered"
Last edited by Jaxonalden; 09-26-2008 at 08:14 AM.
|
|
|
09-26-2008, 08:49 AM
|
#11
|
|
07 Carrera S Cab
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,273
|
True, I doubt it would be a big deal either way. Let us know if you feel or hear any difference.
__________________
Current: 07 Carrera S Cab in Midnight Blue
Previous: 01 Boxster in Arctic Silver, 86 944 in Guards Red
|
|
|
09-26-2008, 09:10 AM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 1,675
|
I certainly don't have those problems since I yanked out my stock air box and replaced it with an EVO Hi-Flow three years ago. Forget the fairytales of CEL and MAF problems; if you know how to properly oil a cone filter, those problems don't arise. You'll never get the sound an EVO produces with a modified stock box.
|
|
|
09-26-2008, 12:14 PM
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,209
|
Jmatta,
I'm with ya on the properly serviced, cottom based, oil filter thing. Some people just soak the media to the point of it dripping. Just follow the directions!
I'd love to put an EVO on my car. But cost and the love of tinkering prohibit it at this time. I'll let the forum know after I swap out for the screenless stack.
__________________
Sadly on the outside looking in.
"Drive it like the Doctor ordered"
|
|
|
09-26-2008, 01:04 PM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 1,675
|
I hear you...good luck on the swap. I truly believe Porsche purposely put all this stuff in our cars (baffles, screens, secondary cats) to keep them quiet for the EU restrictions. Our cars should have a nice sound, just as Dr. Porsche intended them to in the beginning.
|
|
|
10-04-2008, 11:30 AM
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,033
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jaxonalden
Boxtaboy,
I understand your concerns, but don't stop with the P car. As I said in my post, I don't know of any other car that has a screen aft of the air filter.
|
Here's a MAF sensor for a corvette. Actually I think screens are pretty common for MAF sensors.
Last edited by Adam; 10-04-2008 at 11:37 AM.
|
|
|
10-04-2008, 11:49 AM
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,209
|
OK, I stand corrected. By the looks of that screen I can't see any restriction  . As for me, I'm running without it.
__________________
Sadly on the outside looking in.
"Drive it like the Doctor ordered"
|
|
|
10-06-2008, 02:59 PM
|
#17
|
|
Porscheectomy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 3,011
|
Thanks to Jaxonalden for sending the screen. I had a little time to put it on the flow bench today.
Here's an explanation of the test:
1 - A tube is sealed to the front of the flow bench
2 - A very accurately measured amount of air is drawn through the tube
3 - The screen is then placed on the end of the tube and the air is drawn through again
4 - The difference in pressure drop between the test with the screen and without will give you the pressure drop for the screen for any given volume flow rate.
There is some dependancy in this test on the diameter of the tube, and I couldn't use a 3" tube that would be near the intake diameter of the Boxster because I wouldn't have been able to hold onto it, so my tube diameter is smaller, 1.85". What this means is that the pressure drop for a given CFM will be about 1/4 for the 3" tube of what it is for the 1.85" tube that I'm using. I've got a plot for the 1.85" tube and a corrected plot for the 3" tube.
Here are some pictures:
1) Here's the tube ready for the flow bench. It is attached to the bench with the cardboard sheet at the center. The sheet at the end is used to attach the screen.
2) Here's the sheet at the end.
3) This is the tube attached to the flow bench.
4) This is the end sheet with the screen attached.
5) The pressure curve of the tube with and without the screen
6) Pressure drop with the 1.85" tube
7) Pressure drop with the 3" tube
A 3.2L engine at 7200 RPM is moving about 400CFM at 100% volumetric efficiency. It's probably more like 50% at redline. So you can see at 200CFM, the pressure drop is 0.2 inches of water, or about 0.0072 psi. Which for the uninitiated is very small. The % increase in pressure between with and without the screen is about 5-6%.
Last edited by blue2000s; 10-06-2008 at 03:03 PM.
|
|
|
10-06-2008, 07:54 PM
|
#18
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,209
|
Blue2000S,
Thanks so much for doing the leg work for the members of the Forum. I didn't realize there was so much to getting the real numbers. Like I said, I thought you could just put a flow meter on and read the delta. This is obviously the correct way to do it. If I understand your last statement, the difference is 5-6% or about 24 CFM increase over the 400 CFM @ 7200 rpm.
Power increase if any? My guess is the engine would enjoy the better breathing. Again, thanks to Blue2000S for the great work.  Beers on me if we ever meet.
__________________
Sadly on the outside looking in.
"Drive it like the Doctor ordered"
Last edited by Jaxonalden; 10-06-2008 at 08:11 PM.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:06 PM.
| |