07-12-2011, 05:58 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Miami florida
Posts: 1,591
|
Tire pressure
Why does Porsche recommend 7 pounds difference in tire pressure front to rear?
I've only had my car a couple of months and just recently statrted to push it in the corners. On 60-70 mph sweepers I noticed pronounced lift throttle oversteer. I said to myself, this is a Boxster, the mid engine should make the car very balanced and all, but it felt like an air cooled 911 when I got off the gas in corners.
So I put 4 more PSI in the fronts and it felt better. Then I went to 36 front and rear and now it feels great.
Is there a reason for 29 front/36 rear?
__________________
Current car
2000 Boxster 2.7l red/black
Previous cars
1973 Opel Manta
1969(?) Fiat 850 Convertible
1979 Lancia Beta Coupe
1981 Alfa Romeo GTV 6
1985 Alfa Romeo Graduate
1985 Porsche 944
1989 Porsche 944
1981 Triumph TR7
1989 (?) Alfa Romeo Milano
1993 Saab 9000
|
|
|
07-12-2011, 06:30 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 43
|
I believe the tendency of the boxster is to oversteer and possibly the manufacturer recommended the psi to offer more control in a high speed cornering situation, as well as during daily driving, where turn-in is more valued at low speeds.
Higher pressure promotes more high speed stability, however the tire takes a while longer to warm up. Slightly less grip. Slightly lower tire footprint.
Lower pressure gives you more flexibility and better cornering as the tire warms up more quickly. Larger tire footprint. More grip. Yet wears out more quickly as well.
I assume making the rear more stable and the fronts more nimble and grippy makes the car a better daily driver and helps the tires wear more evenly. I have 19" wheels and follow the manufacturers specs and love the handling.
I'm not sure what you're feeling, but I know if I need to slow down or brake quickly I want to more turn-in ability from that oversteer and grip in the front. Everyone drives differently tho. And you may prefer a different setup. The best setup is the one that works for you that you can feel. The manufacturer has to cater to the needs of the normal daily driver.
__________________
Black/Black 987 2005 S
|
|
|
07-12-2011, 06:31 PM
|
#3
|
www.klisstle.com
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 926
|
Conventional wisdom is that it's safer for the average Boxster driver to have a car that pushes versus one that's loose. Yes, I live in NASCAR country.
|
|
|
07-13-2011, 05:46 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Miami florida
Posts: 1,591
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddb
Conventional wisdom is that it's safer for the average Boxster driver to have a car that pushes versus one that's loose. Yes, I live in NASCAR country.
|
That make sense, that the car should push, rather than oversteer, but with lower tire pressure in the front, it seems to induce oversteer. Once I increased the pressure in the front, the oversteer went away.
You especially don't want to oversteer when you get off the throttle, since this is the typical panic reaction that people have when they get into a corner too hot.
__________________
Current car
2000 Boxster 2.7l red/black
Previous cars
1973 Opel Manta
1969(?) Fiat 850 Convertible
1979 Lancia Beta Coupe
1981 Alfa Romeo GTV 6
1985 Alfa Romeo Graduate
1985 Porsche 944
1989 Porsche 944
1981 Triumph TR7
1989 (?) Alfa Romeo Milano
1993 Saab 9000
|
|
|
07-13-2011, 05:56 AM
|
#5
|
Track rat
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern ID
Posts: 3,701
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by san rensho
Why does Porsche recommend 7 pounds difference in tire pressure front to rear?
I've only had my car a couple of months and just recently statrted to push it in the corners. On 60-70 mph sweepers I noticed pronounced lift throttle oversteer. I said to myself, this is a Boxster, the mid engine should make the car very balanced and all, but it felt like an air cooled 911 when I got off the gas in corners.
So I put 4 more PSI in the fronts and it felt better. Then I went to 36 front and rear and now it feels great.
Is there a reason for 29 front/36 rear?
|
My best guess is ride comfort. The car feels smoother with 29F. I typically run 32 cold all around on the street.
Yes every car will exhibit throttle lift oversteer without active stability management... even a 63 Ford Falcon. It's a physics thing.
__________________
2009 Cayman 2.9L PDK (with a few tweaks)
PCA-GPX Chief Driving Instructor-Ret.
|
|
|
07-13-2011, 07:35 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 2,668
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Topless
My best guess is ride comfort. The car feels smoother with 29F. I typically run 32 cold all around on the street.
Yes every car will exhibit throttle lift oversteer without active stability management... even a 63 Ford Falcon. It's a physics thing.
|
For sure.....even worse if you are in a sweeper and lift in a slide/drift, in damp conditions and baked tires.....it will over steer on the opposite lock right quick....don't ask me how I know this  It does seem more er em violent with engine amid ships though
__________________
986 00S
|
|
|
07-13-2011, 07:39 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 2,668
|
Oh yes I like 31f and 34r but I am not racing the car
__________________
986 00S
|
|
|
07-13-2011, 08:00 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southern New jersey
Posts: 1,054
|
I find this interesting, because I was just complaining on another thread about how my 987 Doesn't display any trailing-throttle oversteer. I actually find it a to be a helpful trait, and about the only thing that will kill mid-corner understeer. Is this another difference between a 986 and 987?
The "snap" oversteer is partially due to the mid-engine design, more rear weight & grip due to wider rear tires, and a lower MOI, but I think the biggest reason is the short wheelbase.
|
|
|
07-13-2011, 09:53 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 2,668
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephen wilson
I find this interesting, because I was just complaining on another thread about how my 987 Doesn't display any trailing-throttle oversteer. I actually find it a to be a helpful trait, and about the only thing that will kill mid-corner understeer. Is this another difference between a 986 and 987?
The "snap" oversteer is partially due to the mid-engine design, more rear weight & grip due to wider rear tires, and a lower MOI, but I think the biggest reason is the short wheelbase.
|
I was considering a constant throttle position and then moving to more open as in corner exit. Perhaps you are speaking to the corner entry phase. I too in the 986 can and do get understeer and have not yet properly reliably learned to correct as you have described. I am a beginner. While accelerating in a sweeper, I have noticed the car twich nose out...to understeer when lifting for traffic. It is really pronounced as if the body is flexing....and I can't feel that the rears were sliding, or can't believe it. Would it have something to do with my differential. If I get a chance I will try going back on the throttle to get the car pointed accurately
__________________
986 00S
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:36 AM.
| |