10-24-2007, 10:24 AM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#1
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Registered User 
			
			
			
			
				 
				Join Date: May 2006 
				Location: Annapolis Maryland 
				
				
					Posts: 1,528
				 
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		| 
			
				 
					Originally Posted by blue2000s
					
				 
				Every system in the transmission is built with what's called a factor of safety, which means they are overdesigned for purposes of functionality under extreme conditions, accounting for any manufacturing variations/defects, accounting for any misjudgement in engineering or inaccuracy in calculation, and longevity.  When a more powerful engine is placed in a car that wasn't designed to accept it, this margin for safety is reduced, but it still may be enough for the car to work, at least for a while. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
So  that's why I go through so many AODs.   
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			10-24-2007, 10:40 AM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#2
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Guest 
			
			
			
			
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 
			This is what I think Tholyoak is saying: 
 
Let's say you have a 986 Boxster with 240 HP. If it looses 15% HP (or 36 hp) you have about 204 HP at the wheels. 
 
Now you do a engine swap with a 3.6L engine that has maybe 330 HP. It will be in the same car with the same exact tranny, tires, everything. So, how much HP to the wheels? 330- 36= 294 HP or 330-15% (50 hp) = 280??
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	| 
		
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			10-24-2007, 11:13 AM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#3
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Porscheectomy 
			
			
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2006 
				Location: Seattle Area 
				
				
					Posts: 3,011
				 
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		| 
			
				 
					Originally Posted by bmussatti
					
				 
				This is what I think Tholyoak is saying: 
 
Let's say you have a 986 Boxster with 240 HP. If it looses 15% HP (or 36 hp) you have about 204 HP at the wheels. 
 
Now you do a engine swap with a 3.6L engine that has maybe 330 HP. It will be in the same car with the same exact tranny, tires, everything. So, how much HP to the wheels? 330- 36= 294 HP or 330-15% (50 hp) = 280?? 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
Like Lucky and I said, 15%.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			10-24-2007, 11:14 AM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#4
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Registered User 
			
			
			
			
				 
				Join Date: May 2006 
				Location: Annapolis Maryland 
				
				
					Posts: 1,528
				 
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		| 
			
				 
					Originally Posted by bmussatti
					
				 
				This is what I think Tholyoak is saying: 
 
Let's say you have a 986 Boxster with 240 HP. If it looses 15% HP (or 36 hp) you have about 204 HP at the wheels. 
 
Now you do a engine swap with a 3.6L engine that has maybe 330 HP. It will be in the same car with the same exact tranny, tires, everything. So, how much HP to the wheels? 330- 36= 294 HP or 330-15% (50 hp) = 280?? 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
I think 280, but of course, I didn't finish engineering school.  I  went a different route.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			10-24-2007, 11:35 AM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#5
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Registered User 
			
			
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2005 
				Location: South Carolina 
				
				
					Posts: 530
				 
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		| 
			
				 
					Originally Posted by Grizzly
					
				 
				So  that's why I go through so many AODs.    
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
No, it's your right foot that's to blame.    
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				Jack 
2000 Boxster S - gone - 
2006 Audi A6 Quattro 3.2
			 
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			10-24-2007, 03:54 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#6
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Registered User 
			
			
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2006 
				Location: Glen Allen, ON 
				
				
					Posts: 314
				 
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			OK well I really didn't believe that in transplanting my 2.5L engine for my 3.6L X51 motor that it takes 15 more hp to get the power from the crank to the wheels.   
 I think I found the answer.   It turns out that the 15% loss has to do with the rate of acceleration of the large drums on an inertial dyno.  On a load control dyno, you assume a constant amount of parasitic drive train loss.
 
A good explanation can be found here for those that are interested.
 http://home.earthlink.net/~spchurch/churchautomotivetesting/id12.html
Todd
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				Current Cars: 
1989 911 Targa 
1984 944 Original Owner 
1971 911T
			 
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			10-24-2007, 03:59 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#7
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Porscheectomy 
			
			
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2006 
				Location: Seattle Area 
				
				
					Posts: 3,011
				 
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		| 
			
				 
					Originally Posted by tholyoak
					
				 
				OK well I really didn't believe that in transplanting my 2.5L engine for my 3.6L X51 motor that it takes 15 more hp to get the power from the crank to the wheels.   
 I think I found the answer.   It turns out that the 15% loss has to do with the rate of acceleration of the large drums on an inertial dyno.  On a load control dyno, you assume a constant amount of parasitic drive train loss.
 
A good explanation can be found here for those that are interested.
 http://home.earthlink.net/~spchurch/churchautomotivetesting/id12.html
Todd  
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
That's accounted for and subtracted out when you get the dyno sheet so it's not part of the loss we're talking about.  You're stuck with 15% man.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			10-24-2007, 04:26 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#8
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Registered User 
			
			
			
				
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2006 
				Location: Shawnee, KS 
				
				
					Posts: 159
				 
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 
			I pulled 207 HP and 172TQ on Imagine Auto's dyno. I have a 2000 2.7 with EVO intake, headers and exhaust. Heres the ? should I do the GIAC flash or is it worth it? By the 15% I am already getting 243.6 HP to the crank. Will the Ecu flash really ad more?
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			10-24-2007, 04:30 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#9
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Registered User 
			
			
			
				
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2006 
				Location: Virginia 
				
				
					Posts: 916
				 
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			"I pulled 207 HP and 172TQ on Imagine Auto's dyno. I have a 2000 2.7 with EVO intake, headers and exhaust. Heres the ? should I do the GIAC flash or is it worth it? By the 15% I am already getting 243.6 HP to the crank. Will the Ecu flash really ad more?" 
I picked up about 12 hp when I added a chip to my car. 
 
Ed
   
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				My Car Webpage
 
2000 2.7L Boxster 102K; TTP intake, headers, high-flow cats; Dansk high-flow muffler; Autothority ECU chip; TechnoTorque 2; Bilstein coilovers; Racing Dynamics strut brace; stress-bar suspension kit; Aasco lightweight flywheel, B&M short shiftkit; 18" wheels; spare tire delete; OEM GT3 seats; JL audio speakers and subwoofer; Alpine PDX-5/PDX-2 amps; Kenwood DNX8120 CD/DVD/Nav; litronics, deambered
			 
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			10-24-2007, 04:32 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#10
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Guest 
			
			
			
			
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		| 
			
				 
					Originally Posted by edevlin
					
				 
				"I pulled 207 HP and 172TQ on Imagine Auto's dyno. I have a 2000 2.7 with EVO intake, headers and exhaust. Heres the ? should I do the GIAC flash or is it worth it? By the 15% I am already getting 243.6 HP to the crank. Will the Ecu flash really ad more?" 
I picked up about 12 hp when I added a chip to my car. 
 
Ed
    
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
Ed, and you decreased your tire-life by 95%!!   
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	| 
		
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
 
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
		
	
		 
		Posting Rules
	 | 
 
	
		
		You may not post new threads 
		You may not post replies 
		You may not post attachments 
		You may not edit your posts 
		 
		
		
		
		
		HTML code is On 
		 
		
	  | 
 
 
	 | 
	
		
	 | 
 
 
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:44 PM. 
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
 
 |    |