Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-17-2007, 01:20 PM   #8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 846
Maybe a little helpful: From EDMUNDS:

1999 Porsche 2.5 Boxster
Weight: 2825
HP: 201 @ 6,000 rpm
TQ: 181 @ 4500 rpm
0-60mph = 6.5 sec

1997 BMW Z3 2.8
Weight: 2690lb
HP: 190 @ 5300rpm
TQ: 207 @ 3950
0-60 = 6.7 sec

So.. from here, the BMW is lighter and creates more peak Torque (TQ) at a lower rpm AND creates its Peak HP (albeit 10 less hp than the boxster) at a lower rpm.

From this alone I would surmise the BMW to "feel" quicker off the line than a 2.5l boxster.

Suprisingly, the numbers listed on Edmunds show the Boxster marginally quicker. Lets also realize that "your" acceleration times may vary due to skill, conditions, tires, engine mileage etc.

I also imagine the Z3 could have felt quicker due to driver placement (it seems you sit pretty far back in the Z3, whereas in the Boxster you are right in the middle) and other "sensory" differences (sounds, vehicle "squat" under acceleration etc.)
__________________
1976 914 2.0
2000 Boxster 2.7 (sold)
1978 911 SC (sold)
1970 914 w/2056 (sold)

Last edited by racer_d; 08-17-2007 at 01:23 PM.
racer_d is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page