911 vs Boxster S

[iflyadesk]

Originally Posted by Adam

I know this is blasphemy to the porsche purists, but porsche needs to kill the 911 and let the boxster/cayman take it's spot. I know change is tough, but lets face it, the engine is in the wrong place and if they are truly a performance car company then they know what to do.

I don't know how many 911 guys you've hung out with, but I've had someone say to my face that the Boxster and the 944 were the biggest mistakes Porsche ever made because they brought cheap losers into the Porsche elite.

There is a lot of ego feeding that takes place in the upper half of Porsche's line. These guys almost prefer the cars to be more expensive because it makes them feel more exclusive. You will never lose that element. I for one am almost surprised that the Boxster is still around. Their profit margins are much lower, and it would elevate the prestige and exclusivity of the brand to keep our "mere middle class blood" out of the pure bread line.

This is also why Ferrari will never bring back the Dino.

Of course, I instructed a corporate group once that had a bunch of 911 guys. After a member smashed up his beauty real bad at the track, we discussed renting race cars. We got them all in spec miatas, and after the initial disgust of the thought of driving a mere miata, they could not shut up about how fun and fast those little cars were. This is how I feel about the Boxster. It is loads of fun, whereas the 911 is just fast.

[MartinJ]

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/autoexpressnews/204171/ferrari_420_dino.html

[iflyadesk]

I recently read in a car magazine (I know that's ridiculously vague, but my memory escapes me at the moment) an interview with the CEO of Ferrari. He said under no uncertain terms that there would not be a Dino. The reason cited was keeping the prestige level of Ferrari high.

Now that doesn't mean he was telling the truth or that things won't change. I just wouldn't hold my breath.

[mylamb]

I have a back issue of EVO magazine that compared a loaded (PCCB) 987 Boxster S against a base 997 coupe with the standard brakes. After several test laps on one of their tracks, they consistently posted slightly better lap times with the Boxster. By slightly better, I mean 0.2 - 0.4 seconds. True, the Boxster had ceramic composite brakes, something that most Boxster owners will never order (and don't need) but it does say a lot, that it was able to best the 911's times. Unfortunately, once you tack on the price of PCCB, the Boxster ceases to be such a value!


And of course, after all that testing, I'm sure you know how the EVO writers voted... "We'd rather have the 911." Oh, well...

[AUDIOGUY]

I wonder if the guys on the 911 forum ever really wonder if the Boxster S is a better car?? Something tells me probably not.

[mtch]

Originally Posted by AUDIOGUY

I wonder if the guys on the 911 forum ever really wonder if the Boxster S is a better car?? Something tells me probably not.

While @ a DE event @ VIR, I had the only Boxster S there. (03) There were also some Caymans, but mostly 911s of various model yr and trim levels. While there I swapped cars with a friend who has a 00 Carrera. After a short session, we compared notes. We both agreed that the Boxster S was easier to drive fast and inspired more confidence when approaching limits. We he was also surprised at the speed that the Boxster S could carry around the track. It's lower tq numbers gave him the idea that is would be much slower out of corners, but the balance and lighter weight helped make up for that. Although a DE event is not a race, there are always competitive undertones, and MANY 911 owners were surprised to see a Boxster (of all things) moving just as quickly or quicker around the track than than their cars. This is especially true or owners of the pre-996 cars.

In Porsche circles and every other owner group , you will find car guys and fan boys. The car guys are usually informed and have knowledge and information on a broad spectrum of sports cars. Fan boys usually believe that their cars are the only true sports cars and nothing can compare. You'll find that cars guys have a true respect for the Boxster and its capabilities, while fan boys believe that it's not even worth mentioning in the same breath or worthy to be on the track with their 1974 911s with 180 hp.

So to answer the question, the ideas and opinions of the uninformed don't hold much weigh.

[blue2000s]

Originally Posted by mtch

While @ a DE event @ VIR, I had the only Boxster S there. (03) There were also some Caymans, but mostly 911s of various model yr and trim levels. While there I swapped cars with a friend who has a 00 Carrera. After a short session, we compared notes. We both agreed that the Boxster S was easier to drive fast and inspired more confidence when approaching limits. We he was also surprised at the speed that the Boxster S could carry around the track. It's lower tq numbers gave him the idea that is would be much slower out of corners, but the balance and lighter weight helped make up for that. Although a DE event is not a race, there are always competitive undertones, and MANY 911 owners were surprised to see a Boxster (of all things) moving just as quickly or quicker around the track than than their cars. This is especially true or owners of the pre-996 cars.

Which is why it's such a shame that Porsche refuses to professionally compete with Caymans or even offer a track version.

[Pilot2519j]

My opinion is no. The 986-987 as well as the Cayman will out-handle the 911. Besides that it is a more drivable car. You don't have to worry of all the weight hanging over the rear tires as you turn. Given equal horsepower the cars would perform pretty even except in the real world of turns and curves, in that arena the Boxsters/Cayman will shine. The new RS-60 with 303 horses pushes the top speed of the 987 to over 170 mph. If the comparisons are cabriolet to Boxster then the performance advantage of the 911 diminishes. Considering the delta of the top speeds and 0-60 of both cars it is negligible and since in the US you cant drive like in the Autobahn then top speed is removed from the equation.
The Boxster has beautiful lines as well as the Cayman much more aesthetic than the 911 cabrio which looks like a rube goldberg sandwich. Those consumers( the perrier crowd) than have no knowledge of cars will opt for the 911 because of its bling. Those who know about cars and handling will opt for the Boxster and Cayman because of their bang.

[NickCats]

Blink,

How often to you get to drive the 911 ?

Nick

[blinkwatt]

Originally Posted by NickCats

Blink,

How often to you get to drive the 911 ?

Nick

Lol I drive it out of the garage often so I can work on my 986. I drive it about once a month or whenever my Dad does a mod and wants a photo shoot with my camera friend.

[986Rick]

Originally Posted by MartinJ

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/autoexpressnews/204171/ferrari_420_dino.html

Call me silly, but it looks like the Ferrari guys have allot of lines off the Cayman on that thing.

BTW- totally agree about the fanboys vs car guys. It's all about the driver at the level most of us compete at. For example: I have a friend that regularly puts the beatdown on Corvette Z06's in his Turbocharged 96 Miata in the modified street class at local motocross events. Makes most eyes pop out. His car is hella scary fast. Dynos at something like 250HP @ the wheels.

on a cur guy topic--It's weird sometimes going from my old beater (stock miata), to the BoxS. In a way, I wish I had some attributes of my Miata on the BoxS...Most notably the tight, fast steering box. While everything else is faster on my p-car, going from my miata to it , from a steering standpoint, feels like going from a schitzophrenic mouse to a lathargic cow.

Hmmmn...I wonder if there are tuning mods for faster steering on a Box out there...

-R.

[blinkwatt]

I have both a 986 S & 996 c2,both 01's.

996=flashy,historic,respect from every driver on the road & wicked speed
986=more fun just to drive and easier to drive when pushing it

Another thing to note,whenever I've whipped a 986 around a turn too hard it's been very easy to correct. I heard 996s can result in the exact opposite.......

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Porsche-997-GT3-Motor_W0QQitemZ260217758599QQcmdZViewItem?hash=ite m260217758599

I (hopefully) will get behind the wheel of the 996 at least once this auto-x season along with my 986 S. I'll report back when that happens.

[Jacques79]

Originally Posted by 986Rick

Call me silly, but it looks like the Ferrari guys have allot of lines off the Cayman on that thing.

BTW- totally agree about the fanboys vs car guys. It's all about the driver at the level most of us compete at. For example: I have a friend that regularly puts the beatdown on Corvette Z06's in his Turbocharged 96 Miata in the modified street class at local motocross events. Makes most eyes pop out. His car is hella scary fast. Dynos at something like 250HP @ the wheels.

on a cur guy topic--It's weird sometimes going from my old beater (stock miata), to the BoxS. In a way, I wish I had some attributes of my Miata on the BoxS...Most notably the tight, fast steering box. While everything else is faster on my p-car, going from my miata to it , from a steering standpoint, feels like going from a schitzophrenic mouse to a lathargic cow.

Hmmmn...I wonder if there are tuning mods for faster steering on a Box out there...

-R.

If you like quick steering try a 2003 Honda S2000. (Not the 2004+)

It's so intuitive and responsive it's bordeline ridiculous.

[meerzee]

Excellent post. It is entirely true when dealing with the 996/997 elite crew.
Remember my "Boxsters Suck" thread where my 11 year old nephew reminded me how my Boxster sucks. http://986forum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13662 --- I have always thought was funny and directly related to his dad's comments I am sure (GT3, Viper GTS, Lambo owner), so what do you expect right?

Well, amazingly I moved to a new subdvision in Mandeville with houses in
400-600k range and neighborhood kids actually had an entirely positive reaction. Heck, I even drove it to work across the causeway and got it above 4k (just to clean the carbon) LOL -- a few times....I think I briefly hit 110 while avoiding a "pacer convention" with a few drivers...it was a fun couple seconds anyhoo...

I don't thnk we will ever lose the "entry level image" when it comes to the purists, but I love my car for exactly what it is....a fun distraction and toy that just makes me smile each time I drive it...and that to me is truly priceless.....

Originally Posted by iflyadesk

I don't know how many 911 guys you've hung out with, but I've had someone say to my face that the Boxster and the 944 were the biggest mistakes Porsche ever made because they brought cheap losers into the Porsche elite.

There is a lot of ego feeding that takes place in the upper half of Porsche's line. These guys almost prefer the cars to be more expensive because it makes them feel more exclusive. You will never lose that element. I for one am almost surprised that the Boxster is still around. Their profit margins are much lower, and it would elevate the prestige and exclusivity of the brand to keep our "mere middle class blood" out of the pure bread line.

This is also why Ferrari will never bring back the Dino.

Of course, I instructed a corporate group once that had a bunch of 911 guys. After a member smashed up his beauty real bad at the track, we discussed renting race cars. We got them all in spec miatas, and after the initial disgust of the thought of driving a mere miata, they could not shut up about how fun and fast those little cars were. This is how I feel about the Boxster. It is loads of fun, whereas the 911 is just fast.