911 vs Boxster S

[racer_d]

Again.. from a "numbers" standpoint, the 911 isn't "worth" it... but cars like this should be bought on "emotion" and "desire" and there are still many folks who would answer the question by driving a 911.

While comparing apples to oranges, driving my 2000 Boxster at the track is "easy" .. but driving my 1978 911 was much more "rewarding".

[NickCats]

PL,

Regarding the Cayman S, all specs are the same as the Boxster S except price ( $59,100 ) and weight ( 2954 lbs ).

Adam, the reason I was using the Boxster S and 911 coupe is due to price. 911 cab puts you in the $80k price range, $25k more than the Boxster S.

Thanks for all the feedback, guys ( and also to cfos and flyadesk for the rant on specs ).

Nick

[hdpt73]

i'd buy a cayman over a 911. nicer curves, engine in the right place. but if i had the money i'd buy a 911 turbo over anything porsche makes.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by NickCats

PL,

Regarding the Cayman S, all specs are the same as the Boxster S except price ( $59,100 ) and weight ( 2954 lbs ).

Adam, the reason I was using the Boxster S and 911 coupe is due to price. 911 cab puts you in the $80k price range, $25k more than the Boxster S.

Thanks for all the feedback, guys ( and also to cfos and flyadesk for the rant on specs ).

Nick

I know this is blasphemy to the porsche purists, but porsche needs to kill the 911 and let the boxster/cayman take it's spot. I know change is tough, but lets face it, the engine is in the wrong place and if they are truly a performance car company then they know what to do.

[David N.]

I don't mind them offering both. I just mind them limiting the Boxster's power to protect the supposed "relevance" of the 911. Why not tune all your cars to be the best they can be?

-David

[thomschoon]

Originally Posted by David N.

I don't mind them offering both. I just mind them limiting the Boxster's power to protect the supposed "relevance" of the 911. Why not tune all your cars to be the best they can be?

-David

it is all about price point, the 944 turbo was faster then most of the 911's and the 986 S is very close, but you cant insult the Carrera owners by having the entry level machine be faster, same reason there wasnt a coupe for so long. If you look at the Porsche company vision, they will be moving into more markets to capture more market share, but it will always be up scale not down as the margins are better. In the end the 911 is the model that keeps the company profitable year over year which is what the shareholders want.

[blue2000s]

Originally Posted by thomschoon

it is all about price point, the 944 turbo was faster then most of the 911's and the 986 S is very close, but you cant insult the Carrera owners by having the entry level machine be faster, same reason there wasnt a coupe for so long. If you look at the Porsche company vision, they will be moving into more markets to capture more market share, but it will always be up scale not down as the margins are better. In the end the 911 is the model that keeps the company profitable year over year which is what the shareholders want.

2 things, the 944 turbo was more expensive than the garden variety 911 of the same year, and Porsche almost went out of business in the eightys/ninetys, the Boxster was a key product that pulled them out of the toilet.

[Chills]

I have never driven an 911, but I do dream that one day I will order one brand new. I say this sitting at my desk looking at 911's online. I do this every so often, and then I go get in my BoxS and for some reason I stop wanting a 911.

I absolutely love the BoxS. It is so incredibly fun to drive.

Is the 911 worth the extra $15k? Sitting at my desk I tend to say yes, but once I'm driving around in my BoxS it is a much more difficult question to answer.


And BTW, I totally agree with "iflyadesk" regarding stats. Numbers on a sheet won't tell you the whole story. They are useful for people who want to get into a pissing contest about who's car is better. Recently I had someone on another board try to start crap with me about an EVO vs a BoxS. His quote was "an EVO would own a BoxS." Then the numbers started flying.

I don't care about the numbers. I care about how the car makes me feel when driving.

One day I will take a spirited drive in a 911, but until then I'm quite happy to tear about in my BoxS.

[JCL12]

Originally Posted by thomschoon

In the end the 911 is the model that keeps the company profitable year over year which is what the shareholders want.

Are you sure about this? The largest sales by volume is actually the Cayenne, but I certainly don't know what thier margins are per unit...I'd be interested to see a profit-by-model pareto of thier entire line. I'd assume all lines are in the black!

Also, let the 911 owners complain all they want about 986/7/944 bringing poor donkeys to Pcar, but what about an SUV? Not only filling the line with a "soccer mom" car, but its also the lowest MSRP thing they make.

[pteam]

Originally Posted by David N.

I don't mind them offering both. I just mind them limiting the Boxster's power to protect the supposed "relevance" of the 911. Why not tune all your cars to be the best they can be?

-David

Well if they made a boxster to 911 specs and engine then it would be 15grand more.

Also theyre never going to kill the 911, just forget that idea. lol

[djomlas]

Originally Posted by Adam

I know this is blasphemy to the porsche purists, but porsche needs to kill the 911 and let the boxster/cayman take it's spot. I know change is tough, but lets face it, the engine is in the wrong place and if they are truly a performance car company then they know what to do.

the engine's been in the wrong place forever, and they know it too, but there will never be the end of 911

[racer_d]

C'mon now.. to purists, Porsches are air cooled anyway

[iflyadesk]

Originally Posted by Adam

I know this is blasphemy to the porsche purists, but porsche needs to kill the 911 and let the boxster/cayman take it's spot. I know change is tough, but lets face it, the engine is in the wrong place and if they are truly a performance car company then they know what to do.

I don't know how many 911 guys you've hung out with, but I've had someone say to my face that the Boxster and the 944 were the biggest mistakes Porsche ever made because they brought cheap losers into the Porsche elite.

There is a lot of ego feeding that takes place in the upper half of Porsche's line. These guys almost prefer the cars to be more expensive because it makes them feel more exclusive. You will never lose that element. I for one am almost surprised that the Boxster is still around. Their profit margins are much lower, and it would elevate the prestige and exclusivity of the brand to keep our "mere middle class blood" out of the pure bread line.

This is also why Ferrari will never bring back the Dino.

Of course, I instructed a corporate group once that had a bunch of 911 guys. After a member smashed up his beauty real bad at the track, we discussed renting race cars. We got them all in spec miatas, and after the initial disgust of the thought of driving a mere miata, they could not shut up about how fun and fast those little cars were. This is how I feel about the Boxster. It is loads of fun, whereas the 911 is just fast.

[MartinJ]

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/autoexpressnews/204171/ferrari_420_dino.html

[iflyadesk]

I recently read in a car magazine (I know that's ridiculously vague, but my memory escapes me at the moment) an interview with the CEO of Ferrari. He said under no uncertain terms that there would not be a Dino. The reason cited was keeping the prestige level of Ferrari high.

Now that doesn't mean he was telling the truth or that things won't change. I just wouldn't hold my breath.

[mylamb]

I have a back issue of EVO magazine that compared a loaded (PCCB) 987 Boxster S against a base 997 coupe with the standard brakes. After several test laps on one of their tracks, they consistently posted slightly better lap times with the Boxster. By slightly better, I mean 0.2 - 0.4 seconds. True, the Boxster had ceramic composite brakes, something that most Boxster owners will never order (and don't need) but it does say a lot, that it was able to best the 911's times. Unfortunately, once you tack on the price of PCCB, the Boxster ceases to be such a value!


And of course, after all that testing, I'm sure you know how the EVO writers voted... "We'd rather have the 911." Oh, well...

[Pilot2519j]

My opinion is no. The 986-987 as well as the Cayman will out-handle the 911. Besides that it is a more drivable car. You don't have to worry of all the weight hanging over the rear tires as you turn. Given equal horsepower the cars would perform pretty even except in the real world of turns and curves, in that arena the Boxsters/Cayman will shine. The new RS-60 with 303 horses pushes the top speed of the 987 to over 170 mph. If the comparisons are cabriolet to Boxster then the performance advantage of the 911 diminishes. Considering the delta of the top speeds and 0-60 of both cars it is negligible and since in the US you cant drive like in the Autobahn then top speed is removed from the equation.
The Boxster has beautiful lines as well as the Cayman much more aesthetic than the 911 cabrio which looks like a rube goldberg sandwich. Those consumers( the perrier crowd) than have no knowledge of cars will opt for the 911 because of its bling. Those who know about cars and handling will opt for the Boxster and Cayman because of their bang.

[986Rick]

Originally Posted by MartinJ

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/autoexpressnews/204171/ferrari_420_dino.html

Call me silly, but it looks like the Ferrari guys have allot of lines off the Cayman on that thing.

BTW- totally agree about the fanboys vs car guys. It's all about the driver at the level most of us compete at. For example: I have a friend that regularly puts the beatdown on Corvette Z06's in his Turbocharged 96 Miata in the modified street class at local motocross events. Makes most eyes pop out. His car is hella scary fast. Dynos at something like 250HP @ the wheels.

on a cur guy topic--It's weird sometimes going from my old beater (stock miata), to the BoxS. In a way, I wish I had some attributes of my Miata on the BoxS...Most notably the tight, fast steering box. While everything else is faster on my p-car, going from my miata to it , from a steering standpoint, feels like going from a schitzophrenic mouse to a lathargic cow.

Hmmmn...I wonder if there are tuning mods for faster steering on a Box out there...

-R.

[blinkwatt]

I have both a 986 S & 996 c2,both 01's.

996=flashy,historic,respect from every driver on the road & wicked speed
986=more fun just to drive and easier to drive when pushing it

Another thing to note,whenever I've whipped a 986 around a turn too hard it's been very easy to correct. I heard 996s can result in the exact opposite.......

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Porsche-997-GT3-Motor_W0QQitemZ260217758599QQcmdZViewItem?hash=ite m260217758599

I (hopefully) will get behind the wheel of the 996 at least once this auto-x season along with my 986 S. I'll report back when that happens.

[Jacques79]

Originally Posted by 986Rick

Call me silly, but it looks like the Ferrari guys have allot of lines off the Cayman on that thing.

BTW- totally agree about the fanboys vs car guys. It's all about the driver at the level most of us compete at. For example: I have a friend that regularly puts the beatdown on Corvette Z06's in his Turbocharged 96 Miata in the modified street class at local motocross events. Makes most eyes pop out. His car is hella scary fast. Dynos at something like 250HP @ the wheels.

on a cur guy topic--It's weird sometimes going from my old beater (stock miata), to the BoxS. In a way, I wish I had some attributes of my Miata on the BoxS...Most notably the tight, fast steering box. While everything else is faster on my p-car, going from my miata to it , from a steering standpoint, feels like going from a schitzophrenic mouse to a lathargic cow.

Hmmmn...I wonder if there are tuning mods for faster steering on a Box out there...

-R.

If you like quick steering try a 2003 Honda S2000. (Not the 2004+)

It's so intuitive and responsive it's bordeline ridiculous.