View Single Post
Old 02-01-2007, 06:37 AM   #46
porsche986spyder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by MNBoxster
Hi,

I also have to point out that the two cars you named lack the refinement and sensitivity of a Sports Car suspension, especially the Boxster's.

But, a strut tower brace (while a good thing anytime) does not offer any particular advantage which would offset a discrepancy caused by lowering, that's not what they do.

Happy Motoring!... Jim'99
So you think that a SRT-4 Dodge Neon does not have a sports car suspension?!? As fore the PT, well it may not be in the fame class even, but the FRAME & CHASIS, even the engine used for these 2 Chrysler vehicles is almost identical. They used the Neon as a platform to build the PT. As for the strutt brace, I NEVER said it did that. I simply said it was good to add on for structural suport. It just gives your chassis/frame that extra needed suport to keep it from flexing. Yes it has NO advantage for lowering.
porsche986spyder is offline   Reply With Quote