View Single Post
Old 04-11-2017, 04:28 AM   #28
pidj
Registered User
 
pidj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Acton, ON
Posts: 257
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFP in PA View Post
More than once, we have been asked to do a PPI on a vehicle that had a very recent IMS transplant, only to find metal in the sump and filter, which is why the owner tried to do a quick retrofit and then dump the car. Considering what a retrofit costs, I am always suspicious of someone that does one and then immediately puts the car up for sale.
So why does it matter if there is metal present POST IMS change? When we detect metal, we swap the IMS (to alleviate the metal presence) - would more frequent oil changes and monitoring not clear the shavings? If not, then any metal presence would mean the engine is toast regardless of what was or is done, non?

It also begs the question about the $$ 'solution' option (oil pumped into bearing-less 'bearing')? Nedlands is right: What are you supposed to do? Doing it could be bad, not doing it is bad, metal shavings after doing it is bad .... bad bad bad.
__________________
-------------------------------
2001 Boxster S, Guards Red

Last edited by pidj; 04-11-2017 at 04:30 AM.
pidj is offline   Reply With Quote