View Single Post
Old 07-12-2016, 06:02 PM   #33
LAP1DOUG
Registered User
 
LAP1DOUG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 414
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racer Boy View Post
It is my understanding that in the past, the major differences between the SA and M standards were that the SA required absorption of more energy, and of multiple impacts, such as a head hitting a rollbar several times in a roll-over accident. That is why the SA liners are stiffer than the M liners.

The SA helmets also had some flame retardant standards for the liner materials used.
If you read the test standards, both M and SA require multiple impacts in the same location. As I recall there is some difference in the allowable g-forces, but it did not seem like a big difference when I read through it some time ago.

The main difference seems to be that fire proof materials are required for for SA rating.

Too bad that the whole US industry for auto racing and motorcycles has been "brain washed" (so to speak) into believing that Snell is the only acceptable standard.
__________________
Kippis

986S
991S
Van Diemen RF97
LAP1DOUG is offline   Reply With Quote