Quote:
Originally Posted by linderpat
blah blah blah... You can't truly enjoy these cars unless they are driven the way they were designed to be driven. I could honestly care less what others think of me when I drive in any event... yada yada yada.
|
I've never understood that statement:
"Drive these cars the way they were designed to be driven." [sic]
It's a philosophy that escapes me because it seems to only apply to specific cars (yet BMW people et al.,
all feel the same way, too) and to nothing else.
For example, should the 2nd amendment-ors here
only use guns for what they were designed to do? Of course not. *wink*
Alternatively, if a 2015 Toyota Camry is designed with a top speed of 120mph, was it designed with the intention of people driving 100+mph? Interesting dilemma, wouldn't you say? I mean, if it wasn't meant to be driven at over 100mph, why is it designed with a top speed of 120mph? It doesn't make sense. Why does a Toyota need to go over 90mph? But it does!?!
Sarcasm aside, I really like the combination of the two sentences above - The opinion about the only way one can truly obtain fulfillment, followed by the personal disclaimer. I'll tell you why too - it's truly fantastic - if both statements are true, I don't think that... what's this guy's name... linderpat, yeah, that's it - linderpat - as I was saying, I don't think linderpat has any ground to reply to this post, right? I mean he could care less about what people think about his driving in an event (which is based on the philosophy of driving the car the way it was designed to be driven)- surely, he could care
even less about what someone types about these statements, right? Otherwise, his disclaimer is false. Or... if the disclaimer is false, then is the prior sentence also invalid? An interesting case... let's watch and see what happens.
Oh wait, I forgot to start out this post with a Ricky Bobby-ism, "With all due respect..." There. Now there is no way any offense could be taken.
Carry on.