View Single Post
Old 02-17-2014, 11:09 AM   #43
Jake Raby
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
There's one thing that you guys need to understand:

I literally do not care if an engine is retrofitted or not, other than trying to save someone the heartache of having to deal with the issue. This is because the revenue stream thats generated by the sale of an IMS Retrofit doesn't come my way. This is because my work was done, and paid for, in full, years ago. This is the way I wanted it, because I do not want sales to screw with my development.

In all actuality its better for my business if people do not retrofit and the engine does experience some issue. Why? Because we are primarily in the business of solving problems and building engines.

With a 13 month secured backlog for reconstructed engines, we don't have to advertise. The same goes for the side of our house that carries out preventive procedures where we are already booked through April, again, with zero advertisement of these services.

The people that look our way for these things are rarely associated with forums. Of the 30 engines we have queued now, I only know of two of those buyers being active on forums. Being here, or on any other forum has never proven effective for us business wise, thats probably my fault, as I have never been one to sweet talk people into things, and of course, my direct nature with text turns more people off than on.

Trying to make that better.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote