Quote:
Originally Posted by Perfectlap
It has to be an interesting story first, which you certainly had here, but the script has to be very gritty and raw.
|
Agreed. But the first 30 mins of Rush were chronically derivative, cliched claptrap, not gritty and raw. The film really could have been about anything. That's the real pity. The real story is so good, the atmosphere and the way they went about things back then so different. To make it into a generic racing b movie, full of idiotic dialogue and voice overs, was just depressing. Which is why I couldn't get through it.
It's all very subjective, of course. I just found it a deeply naff (nearest translation in US english = tacky) film.