986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners - View Single Post

GR8WHITE · 12-29-2003, 03:12 AM

I've used a Densecharger on my Stangs in the past. Granted the gains weren't huge, but it did help a little. I may see if they are intrested in R&D one for the Boxster. I know it'll be alot cheaper than $700.00. It would still be nice to see the gains that people have gotten from different companies if possible. Some of the Stangs were getting that same bug with CAI's that had a 90 right before the MAS. Something about the way the air was following the bend and not really being read by the MAS that well. Pro M has a MAS that reads 360 around the inlet plumbing that usually solves those type bugs. If the CEL is from that, it shouldn't be too hard to fix. Thanks for any and all input, particularly the MAS bug.

12-29-2003, 03:12 AM	#4
GR8WHITE Registered User Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 3	I've used a Densecharger on my Stangs in the past. Granted the gains weren't huge, but it did help a little. I may see if they are intrested in R&D one for the Boxster. I know it'll be alot cheaper than $700.00. It would still be nice to see the gains that people have gotten from different companies if possible. Some of the Stangs were getting that same bug with CAI's that had a 90 right before the MAS. Something about the way the air was following the bend and not really being read by the MAS that well. Pro M has a MAS that reads 360 around the inlet plumbing that usually solves those type bugs. If the CEL is from that, it shouldn't be too hard to fix. Thanks for any and all input, particularly the MAS bug.