View Single Post
Old 10-11-2012, 07:37 AM   #19
Johnny Danger
Registered User
Johnny Danger's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
Originally Posted by shadrach74 View Post
He did not say 300RWHP, he said 300BHP, which is certainly attainable with a 3.2 motor, if not economical. Putting a 3.6 in a Boxster has to be at least a $10,000 undertaking unless your labor is free.

If things like emissions, efficiency and streetablity are of no concern, 300BHP should not be a huge undertaking for a 3.2, nor insanely expensive.
Regardless if it's WHP or BHP, that's way too much unsprung rotational mass to effectively improve performance on any level.
Don't worry I've got the microfilm.
Johnny Danger is offline   Reply With Quote