View Single Post
Old 06-08-2012, 08:55 PM   #12
Topless
Track rat
 
Topless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern ID
Posts: 3,701
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by pothole View Post
Interesting, why so?
Lighter unsprung/rotational weight, less expensive consumables, never ever have brake overheat issues (even heavy track days in 106F air temps), front base brakes can easily overpower 255 R-comp rubber up front and go into ABS, don't care for the cross-drilled look. Due to my tire choices, brake bias is already pretty far forward. Adding "S" brakes would move it further forward putting the car on it's nose under heavy braking. This would unsettle the car and lengthen braking distances. The opposite of what I want. I see no benefit to "S" brakes on my car at this point.

If I squeezed a 450hp Raby 4.2L motor in there I would generate a lot more brake heat at the track. Then maybe "S" brakes would be needed to help manage heat. Maybe not.
__________________
2009 Cayman 2.9L PDK (with a few tweaks)
PCA-GPX Chief Driving Instructor-Ret.

Last edited by Topless; 06-08-2012 at 09:03 PM.
Topless is offline   Reply With Quote