View Single Post
Old 10-05-2005, 07:00 AM   #3
frankkerfoot
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Red Bank NJ
Posts: 9
Jim
I agree with almost everything you say, except the details about using the leakdown tester. The leakdown testers I have used on previous racing engines measured a continuous leak rate by measuring the pressure drop across a calibrated orifice (much like measuring current by measuring voltage drop across a known resistor, if you are comfortable with electrical analogies). The pressure on the input side of the orifice is set (using the regulator) to a value like 80 PSI or 100 PSI, and with the input pressure still supplied the pressure after the orifice (which is the 2nd gauge, measuring the pressure in the cylinder) determines the leak rate, expressed as either a PSI difference between the two gauge readings, or a percentage. My recollection is that if you shut off the air supply, even on a cylinder with excellent leakdown (a few PSI or less) the pressure in the cylinder goes to zero within a modest number of seconds. The technical details for the leakdown tester you picture describes a continuous flow process like I described.

By the way, leakdown testing has several other advantages over compression testing. Since the process is continuous you can listen to various ports (like the intake port, exhaust port and sump) and determine what is leaking. You can perform leakdown with the piston not at TDC (by anchoring the crank in some way to withstand the air pressure on the piston) and assess ring sealing at points other than TDC.
Frank
frankkerfoot is offline   Reply With Quote