Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JFP in PA
While it may seem counter intuitive, slowing down the water pump can actually produce lower coolant temperatures (within limits). In any cooling system, there is an “ideal” coolant flow rate, at which the heat source is exposed to the coolant for the optimum amount of time for heat transfer to be accomplished. The radiators also have an “ideal” flow rate to get rid of the heat as well. In an Ideal application, the pump would run at a constant speed to provide the best possible cooling (this is one of the several reasons why a lot of race cars use electrically driven water pumps). Unfortunately, because most street automotive cooling systems are mechanically driven (by the belt), once the thermostat is open, the coolant is typically either moving too fast or too slow for optimum transfer due to the range of RPM’s them pump is seeing, resulting in suboptimum heat transfer.
In years gone by, a lot of racers used to pull the thermostats out of engines using belt driven water pumps, assuming “the more flow, the better”, only to find the engine actually ran hotter. But when they replaced the thermostat with a restrictor plate, the engine ran cooler. It had too much flow without the restrictor or the thermostat………..
|
Thanks for the responses.
Suspected that running through the radiators too fast wouldn't create the exposure long enough to cool effectively... but then also suspected that these engines were designed to cool optimally at 4500-6500 rpms, when the cooling is needed more. Or maybe they were designed with more umm "average driving conditions" in mind with the rpms typically in the 2k-4k range and not catering to the enthusiast-type crowd who wants to feel their backs against the seat all the time, but again this is counter intuitive to a lot of other things that are designed to run a hard. Then I suspected I should just ask the experts
Well whatever the ideal range, nobody seems to have any issue with hot engines, even those of us that that live in the heat.