View Single Post
Old 06-23-2009, 03:45 PM   #38
edevlin
Registered User
 
edevlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 916
"your talking about a 2.7L 217 hp versus a 2003 3.2L 258 hp which the same exact 3.2L in 2005 puts out 280 hp."


My point is that it is very expensive to get extra hp out of our cars with bolt-ons. I am quite aware of the hp of all of the base as well as the S-series boxsters. I picked up 12-14% increase in hp in my 2.7L, many have found similar increases in their S-series engines with bolt-ons.

On a good day, I can put out almost 250 hp to the crank (210 hp to the wheels 15% drivetrail loss is 247 hp to the crank). I have also lightened my car so that it weighs several hundred lbs less than the S-series Boxsters. My car was 2775 lbs stock and I have lightened it to around 2650 lbs, so my little 2.7L is lots of fun to drive, even though it may be an apple, or is it an orange.....

Ed

__________________
My Car Webpage

2000 2.7L Boxster 102K; TTP intake, headers, high-flow cats; Dansk high-flow muffler; Autothority ECU chip; TechnoTorque 2; Bilstein coilovers; Racing Dynamics strut brace; stress-bar suspension kit; Aasco lightweight flywheel, B&M short shiftkit; 18" wheels; spare tire delete; OEM GT3 seats; JL audio speakers and subwoofer; Alpine PDX-5/PDX-2 amps; Kenwood DNX8120 CD/DVD/Nav; litronics, deambered
edevlin is offline   Reply With Quote