Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Show and Tell Gallery

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-02-2005, 05:14 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 104
Best Cayman spy pics yet

Me likes!




















__________________
- Jason

http://www.yellowpimp.org/ferrari.jpg
jwocky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 06:21 PM   #2
Registered User
 
Brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
My guess is that this will ultimately be a very pretty coupe.


I guess my issue is that this is so obviously a Boxster that Porsche should dump the Cayman name and rename it so that the relationship is clear.

Also, if this gets 280+ HP, I want that in a roadster too!
Brucelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 06:26 PM   #3
Lux
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 401
I already know that car is gonna kick ass. More torque is never a bad thing. It's funny reading some of the comments from 997 owners. They're getting really defensive.

-
Lux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2005, 04:17 AM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Salisbury Maryland
Posts: 184
Nice butt! It's obvoius; Porsche had a restraining order on Chris Bangle.

Jim
wetstuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2005, 04:50 AM   #5
Registered User
 
QporscheQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 372
I 100% agree Bruce.


IMO

What they should do (or have done) is assign a number to the Boxster family like the 911. Under 911 they have Carrera, Targa, Cabriolet, Turbo etc but all based on the same family. It would have made logical sense to say, okay the Boxster family is the 550 family (or what ever) and under the 550 family we have Boxster, Cayman etc . . . . That would at least go with the other model line and it would also draw a clear path from the Boxster to the Spyder which I think is lost on a lot of people. If nothing else it will help keep the Porsche website from getting cluttered.
__________________
Q
QporscheQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2005, 05:34 AM   #6
Registered User
 
Pilot2519j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Huntersville, NC
Posts: 655
Lineage

Quote:
Originally Posted by QporscheQ
I 100% agree Bruce.


IMO

What they should do (or have done) is assign a number to the Boxster family like the 911. Under 911 they have Carrera, Targa, Cabriolet, Turbo etc but all based on the same family. It would have made logical sense to say, okay the Boxster family is the 550 family (or what ever) and under the 550 family we have Boxster, Cayman etc . . . . That would at least go with the other model line and it would also draw a clear path from the Boxster to the Spyder which I think is lost on a lot of people. If nothing else it will help keep the Porsche website from getting cluttered.
I fully agree with Bruce and Q, because of my own experience. When I went to buy the car I had totally forgotten about the Boxster I did not remember the car existed. I consider myself pretty savy about cars yet the Boxster eluded my radar. It was only when I visited the Porsche showroom that I feel in love with the Boxster. I fully agree that the number 550 Spyder should there since that car was the genesis of this design and style. It appears to me that Porsche eventhough significantly helped financially with the Boxster relagates it to background in all of their advertisement campaigns. They show the 911 ad naseum and some Cayenne. I consider that screwy in their part.
__________________
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate
Pilot2519j is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2005, 05:38 AM   #7
Registered User
 
Pilot2519j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Huntersville, NC
Posts: 655
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwocky
Me likes!



Nice car but a better signature. Shows character and finesse. I like to see the car in Ferrari red!
__________________
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate
Pilot2519j is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2005, 07:55 AM   #8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 154
Let's be careful about using copyrighted Photos

Guys,
I know we all like instant gratification but we also don't want to run afoul of any copyright laws. Next time let's post a "URL" that forum folks can link to.

Thanks
Richard
rkwei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2005, 10:46 AM   #9
Lux
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 401
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkwei
Guys,
I know we all like instant gratification but we also don't want to run afoul of any copyright laws. Next time let's post a "URL" that forum folks can link to.

Thanks
Richard

Unless you know specifically of issues, I've seen pics from other websites posted on a ton of forums without any issues for years. Plus, it says Autoweek right on it. It's not like jwocky is claiming it's his or something.

Not trying to tell you how to run things, just a suggestion...

-
Lux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2005, 12:37 PM   #10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 154
Copyright

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lux
Unless you know specifically of issues, I've seen pics from other websites posted on a ton of forums without any issues for years. Plus, it says Autoweek right on it. It's not like jwocky is claiming it's his or something.

Not trying to tell you how to run things, just a suggestion...

-
Lux,
It is apparent that the pics are from the Autoweek.com website. You can go to the site and read the copyright notice @ http://www.autoweek.com/page.cms?pageId=13 . The punchline is don't copy & paste the pics/text without prior written consent. This is pretty standard text.

I can't comment on other sites but they probably were violating some copyright too. All I'm suggesting is we stay clear of any copyright infringement laws by posting URLs.

So now let's get back to enjoying the pics!
rkwei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2005, 07:21 PM   #11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Posts: 84
Send a message via AIM to wombat7
Just thought I would say some stuff that I've read about the Cayman...

There is a broad misconception that this is going to be a Boxster Coupe. It is more like a Mid-Engine 911. I know some of you are going to disagree, but lets think about it. Its getting a 315 hp 3.4L Flat-6 which is creaping ever closer to the prestegious 911. I have a feeling that this is going to lead to a increase in performance in the 911 which is something that is greatly needed.

I am definately excited for this vehicle to come out. It is going to be jaw dropping...
__________________
- Chad
- Computer Engineering student at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in Terre Haute, IN

1984 944 NA

"Live Fast, Live Young, Leave a good skid mark" - James Dean
wombat7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2005, 07:57 PM   #12
Lux
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 401
How do you come to the conclusion that it's more 911? It's based on the Boxster chassis. Wheelbase will be nowhere near 911 numbers (even if they were to stuff an engine in the back seat of the 911). Fact is, there's nothing 911 about the Cayman...other than 911 ass kicking.


-
Lux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2005, 08:30 PM   #13
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Jose
Posts: 15
Send a message via AIM to sharkster
I am so getting one those... I love 'em...
__________________
http://www.mangogrits.com/akula/sig/newsig.JPG
Alex "Sharky" Ross
Akkurat/EVO GT800 996TT
sharkster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2005, 06:21 AM   #14
Registered User
 
Brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
Talking

There is no such thing as a mid engine 911. To my knowledge, there never has been one and the 997 is of course, rear engine.

Sorry but to have ANY consistency in models, logic etc, this new coupe is a Boxster. Calling it after a Carib island doesn't change the laws of physics or logic.

IHMO!
Brucelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2005, 06:38 AM   #15
Registered User
 
Shortbus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Herndon VA
Posts: 80
Send a message via AIM to Shortbus Send a message via MSN to Shortbus Send a message via Yahoo to Shortbus
Call me crazy, but i'd take a boxster with a hardtop over the coupe any day :dance:

That coupe looks great nonetheless.
Shortbus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2005, 07:34 AM   #16
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,033
The only thing 911 about the Cayman is the engine...3.4L flat 6. Like Lux said...it's a boxster chassis..not 911.
__________________
'03 3.2L GuardsRed/Blk/Blk---6Spd
Options: Litronics, 18" Carrera lights, Bose sound, Painted to match roll bars.
http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m...Mautocross.jpg
Adam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2005, 09:31 AM   #17
Registered User
 
Perfectlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
Does it come with that 'anti-spy photograph' tape around the headlights?
3 months later and those Japanese look headlights still have not grown on me.

If it does come with the silver tape put me down for yellow/red with BBS RS-GT wheels.

The Cayman: Best Performance for the buck Porsche?
Best Peformance for the Buck Porsche/BMW/Audi/Merc (German) sports car?
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW

Last edited by Perfectlap; 03-31-2005 at 10:47 AM.
Perfectlap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2005, 09:35 AM   #18
Registered User
 
QporscheQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 372
Ill play Devil's Advocate here and ask a question, was the GT1 a mid engine 911?


If the Cayman S is everything they say, then I would have no problem saying it is the best bang for your buck Porsche.
__________________
Q
QporscheQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2005, 10:21 AM   #19
Registered User
 
Pilot2519j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Huntersville, NC
Posts: 655
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shortbus
Call me crazy, but i'd take a boxster with a hardtop over the coupe any day :dance:

That coupe looks great nonetheless.
I agree totally. The 986/987 was designed from a fresh sheet of paper as a roadster. You can see that the car looks its best with the top down. The 911 on the other hand was a coupe from the get go. If you look at the Cabriolets you can see that they look odd. The rear is out of kilt. I am in love with the 986/987 styling and doubt a whole bunch that I will ever get any Porsche Coupe! We drive the quintessential roadster ever built, Ok I went over the top, a british racing green XK-E still does it for me.
__________________
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate
Pilot2519j is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2005, 10:55 AM   #20
Registered User
 
Perfectlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
I hope they come out with a Cayman RS6.

1-6 speed manual (only! no tip or paddles)
2-Kevlar seats
3-Harness belt mounting points
4-Light weight Wheels, lightweigh...EVERYTHING!
5-Full Coil over suspension
6-Carrera GT brakes
7-aero kit
8-built in G-tech
9-the most important....a red engine start button.

keep the weight down Porsche it will kick the ass of every other Porsche.

by the way, do you notice the intakes look cheesy on the 987 (like MR2) but look pretty nice on the Cayman. Must be the coloring.

__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW

Last edited by Perfectlap; 03-31-2005 at 11:01 AM.
Perfectlap is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page