986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners

986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners (http://986forum.com/forums/)
-   Performance and Technical Chat (http://986forum.com/forums/performance-technical-chat/)
-   -   Finally: Dyno charts of de-snorked 986S!!! (http://986forum.com/forums/performance-technical-chat/9671-finally-dyno-charts-de-snorked-986s.html)

xclusivecar 02-23-2007 03:37 PM

@ Everyone-- Lets just all de-snorkel and be happy for the great sounds we have just unleashed and the possibility of 1-2% more HP ±2% of that HP. ;)

@ All the engineers-- These debates make the common man (myself) just smile. I have no idea what is being debated, yet love the fact that it is! Keep it up everyone! :cheers:

MNBoxster 02-23-2007 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blue2000s
That's totally incorrect. It's always a restriction and there will always be some pressure drop, no matter how much or little the engine is pulling in as long as some air is moving. A flow bench would show a pressure drop as soon as any air started flowing through the snorkel.

Hi,

Of course you are correct. I just meant to express that I just think this differential in pressure has little to no effect on overall Volumetric Efficiency which of course is a major determinant in how much power the engine can produce.

I'm not convinced that the Snorkel makes a significant difference, but that aside, I don't think the lister has proven otherwise.

Mrs. MNBoxster is away doing the Accenture Match Play Tourney in Tucson, and I'm having some guys over tonight for a little Boozer. But, I have a neat little engine where I can model AVF, TAF rates and VE, for given engine volumes and parameters. I'll plug in the Boxster data to see what we're looking at. With that, and some measurements of the Snorkel (which I have on a shelf in my garage), we should be able to have something more concrete. But, It will be a day or two.

I'll come back to this in a separate thread. Hope to have your input there...

Happy Motoring!... Jim'99

wanna986 02-23-2007 04:10 PM

self-levelling annoyance
 
Jim, while we're on the topic of factoring in variables, do remember to take into account the "self-levelling annoyance" caused by the vodka you mentioned in a previous thread. :cheers:

Bisimoto 02-23-2007 07:08 PM

Wow..this is so sad...so much happened on the board while I spent more time beating my poor S on the dyno today. I have repeated the results on 17...yes 17 passes with and without the "snork". The data remains the same. For what it is worth, this mod produces 4.6~5.5whp at high rpms. Whew!

MNBoxster 02-23-2007 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wanna986
Jim, while we're on the topic of factoring in variables, do remember to take into account the "self-levelling annoyance" caused by the vodka you mentioned in a previous thread. :cheers:

Hi,

What's that all about? You're just being NASTY! No call for that - shame, shame... That's very Clintonesque - attack the detractors - congratulations! Anyway you cut it, thats a cheap shot - Thanks for your valuable contribution to this thread. Feel Good now?...

MNBoxster 02-23-2007 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bisimoto
Wow..this is so sad...so much happened on the board while I spent more time beating my poor S on the dyno today. I have repeated the results on 17...yes 17 passes with and without the "snork". The data remains the same. For what it is worth, this mod produces 4.6~5.5whp at high rpms. Whew!

Hi,

Well you're certainly getting consistent results. I may be starting to come around.

This is for the 3.2L, I doubt the 2.5L w/o egas, Motronic ME 7.2 and variable intake will achieve anywhere near the same result.

I called a friend who owns a shop w/ 2 inertial dynos, and just for ********************s and giggles, I'm gonna run over there this spring and see what it tells me, even with the tire dynamisicm, I should also get consistent positive results based on your findings. A good engineer is also intuitive and still I have this nagging sense that something's amiss.

But, at least for now - You Da Man! Congrats!

Happy Motoring!... Jim'99

Bavarian Motorist 02-24-2007 05:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MNBoxster
Hi,

What's that all about? You're just being NASTY! No call for that - shame, shame... That's very Clintonesque - attack the detractors - congratulations! Anyway you cut it, thats a cheap shot - Thanks for your valuable contribution to this thread. Feel Good now?...


Jim,


I may be wrong, but judging by the "tone" and context of his post, I am sure he was only joking.


:)

wanna986 02-24-2007 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bavarian Motorist
Jim,


I may be wrong, but judging by the "tone" and context of his post, I am sure he was only joking.


:)

http://986forum.com/forums/boxster-general-discussions/9685-self-levelling-annoyance.html

I think Jim knows I'm joking :confused:

Bavarian Motorist 02-24-2007 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wanna986
http://986forum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=9685

I think Jim knows I'm joking :confused:


Could've fooled me :p But maybe that was the point :eek:

koya1893 02-25-2007 07:57 AM

good reading on this post. The "snorkle" is from what I can feel and hear on my 2000 S is definitely a mod one needs to do for what ever reason. Now some data on added hp. There seem to be the question on how to do this. well here's the link.
http://www.ppbb.com/boards/ppbbphp/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Board=ARCHIVES&Number=820409 &page=&view=&sb=&o=

One might have a calibrated body to feel the gain but you sure can hear the change from doing the mod.

Ben

Boxtaboy 02-27-2007 08:22 AM

Is there really that much of a difference in sound? I've driven a few of my friends' Boxsters with the snork removed, and didn't really notice much difference from mine, hence never removing my snork.

Stefan (Boston) 02-27-2007 11:11 AM

Cool
 
Thanks for the great info. For most of us, it's not worth the cost of the dyno run. But it's good to know.

Did you alternate snork, no snork, snork, no snork, etc.? The reason I ask is that the DME does some weird ignition advancement/retardation compensation when it senses a change in air flow. I know that if I unplug my MAF, I get a noticeable increase in power.

Would you be willing to try the same thing with the stock air filter versus K&N?

Bavarian Motorist 02-27-2007 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stefan (Boston)
Thanks for the great info. For most of us, it's not worth the cost of the dyno run. But it's good to know.

Did you alternate snork, no snork, snork, no snork, etc.? The reason I ask is that the DME does some weird ignition advancement/retardation compensation when it senses a change in air flow. I know that if I unplug my MAF, I get a noticeable increase in power.

Would you be willing to try the same thing with the stock air filter versus K&N?

Huh...


That's interesting. I was wondering about that.

Will remove mine tomorrow, btw :D

Sboxin 02-27-2007 02:13 PM

Congratultions on your new Boxster project car!
 
Thank you for posting your dyno info. I will look forward to your continued HARD work on your Boxster.

I have put up a suggestion that Deluboz send you a set of headers to dyno.
We all have been searching for reliable test data on ALL matter of engine modifications --- as you can see by the reponses to your post :cheers:

You have sparked great interest with your Dyno results -- I will continue to watch for all your future hard work results and appreciate your efforts to document the work (especially the photos).

Take care,
Ed

Stefan (Boston) 02-28-2007 06:02 AM

When you unplug the MAF you will get a CEL. You can easily reset it by disconnecting the battery for a short time (first make sure you have your radio code if your car is pre-2003) or by using a OBD-II reader.

When you unplug the MAF the car freaks out briefly. Then it uses an approximation (based on throttle body temperature readings, I believe) to decide how much air is coming in. The car has a tendency to stall when warmed up and idling. But in my base 1999 Boxster, I could keep up with 2000-2002 BoxsterS cars in flat out acceleration up to very high speeds.

Bisimoto 02-28-2007 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stefan (Boston)

Would you be willing to try the same thing with the stock air filter versus K&N?

Yes. My race team is sponsored by K&N. In the next couple of weeks, I will order a K&N filter from the factory for the S and post results as well.

Ed, I am willing and able to test the exhaust systems. I have also ordered a Porsche System Tester 2 to assist with my diagnosis during testing. Thanks for the kind words, and I will keep all informed of my data aquisition.

RandallNeighbour 02-28-2007 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bisimoto
I have also ordered a Porsche System Tester 2 to assist with my diagnosis during testing.

Holy crap! You've got some deep pockets there, friend! Aren't those suckers something like $3-4k or more?

Bisimoto 02-28-2007 07:09 AM

Forgive me for not being clear: I ordered a PST from Durametric for $630. I wish I had DEEP pockets..lol.

Tool Pants 02-28-2007 07:51 AM

For what it is worth, here is info on the 987/Cayman.

http://www.pca.org/tech/tech_qa_question.asp?id={24041683-6376-4DD9-80EC-3A5F748391BF}

If the link does not work I think you have to copy and paste.

Bavarian Motorist 03-03-2007 05:58 AM

OK, now I am REALLY doing this today!


If my friend ever stops sleeping, damn it :\


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website